Proteomics Resource Center User Survey

PRC

Question Title

1. Please mark the services offered by the PRC that your group uses:


Peptide Synthesis	Peptide Synthesis
Mass Spectrometry based Proteomics	Mass Spectrometry based Proteomics
Mass Spectrometry based small molecule analysis,	Mass Spectrometry based small molecule analysis,
Image scanning (Typhoon)	Image scanning (Typhoon)

Question Title

2. What is your level of satisfaction with the following in relation to the Proteomics Resource Center:

	Very Low	Low	Moderate	High	Very high	Not applicable
Access to services and instruments	Access to services and instruments Very Low	Access to services and instruments Low	Access to services and instruments Moderate	Access to services and instruments High	Access to services and instruments Very high	Access to services and instruments Not applicable
Timeliness of delivery of service/product/data	Timeliness of delivery of service/product/data Very Low	Timeliness of delivery of service/product/data Low	Timeliness of delivery of service/product/data Moderate	Timeliness of delivery of service/product/data High	Timeliness of delivery of service/product/data Very high	Timeliness of delivery of service/product/data Not applicable
Type of instruments	Type of instruments Very Low	Type of instruments Low	Type of instruments Moderate	Type of instruments High	Type of instruments Very high	Type of instruments Not applicable
Condition/maintenance of the instruments	Condition/maintenance of the instruments Very Low	Condition/maintenance of the instruments Low	Condition/maintenance of the instruments Moderate	Condition/maintenance of the instruments High	Condition/maintenance of the instruments Very high	Condition/maintenance of the instruments Not applicable
Staff knowledge and expertise	Staff knowledge and expertise Very Low	Staff knowledge and expertise Low	Staff knowledge and expertise Moderate	Staff knowledge and expertise High	Staff knowledge and expertise Very high	Staff knowledge and expertise Not applicable
Professionalism of Center staff	Professionalism of Center staff Very Low	Professionalism of Center staff Low	Professionalism of Center staff Moderate	Professionalism of Center staff High	Professionalism of Center staff Very high	Professionalism of Center staff Not applicable
Reliability	Reliability Very Low	Reliability Low	Reliability Moderate	Reliability High	Reliability Very high	Reliability Not applicable
Consultation services/assay development	Consultation services/assay development Very Low	Consultation services/assay development Low	Consultation services/assay development Moderate	Consultation services/assay development High	Consultation services/assay development Very high	Consultation services/assay development Not applicable
Data analysis	Data analysis Very Low	Data analysis Low	Data analysis Moderate	Data analysis High	Data analysis Very high	Data analysis Not applicable
Training (content and quality)	Training (content and quality) Very Low	Training (content and quality) Low	Training (content and quality) Moderate	Training (content and quality) High	Training (content and quality) Very high	Training (content and quality) Not applicable
Communication by the Center Staff	Communication by the Center Staff Very Low	Communication by the Center Staff Low	Communication by the Center Staff Moderate	Communication by the Center Staff High	Communication by the Center Staff Very high	Communication by the Center Staff Not applicable
Usage fee rates	Usage fee rates Very Low	Usage fee rates Low	Usage fee rates Moderate	Usage fee rates High	Usage fee rates Very high	Usage fee rates Not applicable
Outreach/information about Center services and instruments (i.e., does the Center adequately advertise its services and expertise?)	Outreach/information about Center services and instruments (i.e., does the Center adequately advertise its services and expertise?) Very Low	Outreach/information about Center services and instruments (i.e., does the Center adequately advertise its services and expertise?) Low	Outreach/information about Center services and instruments (i.e., does the Center adequately advertise its services and expertise?) Moderate	Outreach/information about Center services and instruments (i.e., does the Center adequately advertise its services and expertise?) High	Outreach/information about Center services and instruments (i.e., does the Center adequately advertise its services and expertise?) Very high	Outreach/information about Center services and instruments (i.e., does the Center adequately advertise its services and expertise?) Not applicable
Relevant and timely improvements and/or additions to services/instrumentation	Relevant and timely improvements and/or additions to services/instrumentation Very Low	Relevant and timely improvements and/or additions to services/instrumentation Low	Relevant and timely improvements and/or additions to services/instrumentation Moderate	Relevant and timely improvements and/or additions to services/instrumentation High	Relevant and timely improvements and/or additions to services/instrumentation Very high	Relevant and timely improvements and/or additions to services/instrumentation Not applicable

Question Title

3. Please comment on services/products that the Proteomics Resource Center needs to improve. For the service/product referenced above as needing improvement, how critical to your research is it to have this service/product available from a Resource Center?

Question Title

4. Are there services/products/instruments not currently available in University Resource Centers that you recommend the University pursue making available in the Proteomics Resource Center?

YES

NO

If yes, please describe:

Question Title

5. Does your Laboratory obtain services similar to those offered by the Proteomics Resource Center from a different source?

YES

NO