Patent Prosecution 2023 - Panel #5 - Secondary Considerations and the Art of Responding to Obviousness Rejections

Question Title

* 1. Contact Information

First and Last Name

Company Name

State Bar Number

Address

City/Town

State/Province

ZIP/Postal Code

Country

Email Address

Mobile Phone Number

Question Title

* 2. Are you seeking CLE credit (within the US Only) for this program? If yes, please include all states and bar numbers, above.

Yes

Question Title

* 3. Did this panel meet your educational objectives

Excellent

Very good

Good

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 4. Please evaluate each of the speakers on their overall teaching effectiveness (1 low; 5 high).

	1	2	3	4	5
Keith Fredlake	Keith Fredlake 1	Keith Fredlake 2	Keith Fredlake 3	Keith Fredlake 4	Keith Fredlake 5
John Hocker	John Hocker 1	John Hocker 2	John Hocker 3	John Hocker 4	John Hocker 5
Keri Sicard	Keri Sicard 1	Keri Sicard 2	Keri Sicard 3	Keri Sicard 4	Keri Sicard 5

Question Title

* 5. Please evaluate each of the speakers on their knowledge of the subject matter (1 low; 5 high).

	1	2	3	4	5
Keith Fredlake	Keith Fredlake 1	Keith Fredlake 2	Keith Fredlake 3	Keith Fredlake 4	Keith Fredlake 5
John Hocker	John Hocker 1	John Hocker 2	John Hocker 3	John Hocker 4	John Hocker 5
Keri Sicard	Keri Sicard 1	Keri Sicard 2	Keri Sicard 3	Keri Sicard 4	Keri Sicard 5

Question Title

* 6. Is there an issue related to this topic that deserved further attention by the panel? If yes, what issue?

Question Title

* 7. Please ask any questions you were unable to ask/have answered during this panel.

Question Title

* 8. Did the substantive discussions contain significant professional content?

Yes

Question Title

* 9. Is this a topic that a future IPWatchdog program should include?

Yes

Question Title

* 10. Please recommend any other master-level speakers (12 or more years of experience) we should consider inviting to speak on this or similar topics.

Patent Prosecution 2023 - Panel #5 - Secondary Considerations and the Art of Responding to Obviousness Rejections

Question Title

* 1. Contact Information

Question Title

* 2. Are you seeking CLE credit (within the US Only) for this program? If yes, please include all states and bar numbers, above.

Question Title

* 3. Did this panel meet your educational objectives

Question Title

* 4. Please evaluate each of the speakers on their overall teaching effectiveness (1 low; 5 high).

Question Title

* 5. Please evaluate each of the speakers on their knowledge of the subject matter (1 low; 5 high).

Question Title

* 6. Is there an issue related to this topic that deserved further attention by the panel? If yes, what issue?

Question Title

* 7. Please ask any questions you were unable to ask/have answered during this panel.

Question Title

* 8. Did the substantive discussions contain significant professional content?

Question Title

* 9. Is this a topic that a future IPWatchdog program should include?

Question Title

* 10. Please recommend any other master-level speakers (12 or more years of experience) we should consider inviting to speak on this or similar topics.

Question Title

* 11. Please provide additional comments, suggestions, or feedback.