Evaluation and CPD Certificate for Hypoparathyroidism 2025 Summit: Translating Science from the Laboratory to the Clinic Hypoparathyroidism 2025 Summit: Translating Science from the Laboratory to the Clinic Question Title * 1. Please rate the overall learning objectives of this summit.I am able to: 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree Identify unmet needs in the diagnosis and medical management of hypoparathyroidism Identify unmet needs in the diagnosis and medical management of hypoparathyroidism 1-Strongly Disagree Identify unmet needs in the diagnosis and medical management of hypoparathyroidism 2-Disagree Identify unmet needs in the diagnosis and medical management of hypoparathyroidism 3-Neutral Identify unmet needs in the diagnosis and medical management of hypoparathyroidism 4-Agree Identify unmet needs in the diagnosis and medical management of hypoparathyroidism 5-Strongly Agree Outline recent insights in Calcium-Sensor Receptor (CaSR) activation and the potential of calcilytics Outline recent insights in Calcium-Sensor Receptor (CaSR) activation and the potential of calcilytics 1-Strongly Disagree Outline recent insights in Calcium-Sensor Receptor (CaSR) activation and the potential of calcilytics 2-Disagree Outline recent insights in Calcium-Sensor Receptor (CaSR) activation and the potential of calcilytics 3-Neutral Outline recent insights in Calcium-Sensor Receptor (CaSR) activation and the potential of calcilytics 4-Agree Outline recent insights in Calcium-Sensor Receptor (CaSR) activation and the potential of calcilytics 5-Strongly Agree Discuss advances in PTH basic research and corresponding clinical implications Discuss advances in PTH basic research and corresponding clinical implications 1-Strongly Disagree Discuss advances in PTH basic research and corresponding clinical implications 2-Disagree Discuss advances in PTH basic research and corresponding clinical implications 3-Neutral Discuss advances in PTH basic research and corresponding clinical implications 4-Agree Discuss advances in PTH basic research and corresponding clinical implications 5-Strongly Agree Describe advances in cell therapies research and corresponding clinical implications Describe advances in cell therapies research and corresponding clinical implications 1-Strongly Disagree Describe advances in cell therapies research and corresponding clinical implications 2-Disagree Describe advances in cell therapies research and corresponding clinical implications 3-Neutral Describe advances in cell therapies research and corresponding clinical implications 4-Agree Describe advances in cell therapies research and corresponding clinical implications 5-Strongly Agree Comments (optional) Question Title * 2. Please provide feedback on the speakers for II. BACKGROUND Michael Mannstadt Aliya Khan Heide Siggelkow The speaker presented information clearly. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Michael Mannstadt menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Aliya Khan menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Heide Siggelkow menu The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Michael Mannstadt menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Aliya Khan menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Heide Siggelkow menu The speaker managed time effectively. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Michael Mannstadt menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Aliya Khan menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Heide Siggelkow menu The speaker was credible and non-biased. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Michael Mannstadt menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Aliya Khan menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Heide Siggelkow menu The speaker's slides were clear and concise. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Michael Mannstadt menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Aliya Khan menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Heide Siggelkow menu Comments (optional) Question Title * 3. Please provide feedback on the speakers for III. CaSR AS A TARGET Hao Zuo Caroline Gorvin Ed Nemeth Kelly Roszko Wenhan Chang The speaker presented information clearly. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Hao Zuo menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Caroline Gorvin menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Ed Nemeth menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Kelly Roszko menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Wenhan Chang menu The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Hao Zuo menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Caroline Gorvin menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Ed Nemeth menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Kelly Roszko menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Wenhan Chang menu The speaker managed time effectively. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Hao Zuo menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Caroline Gorvin menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Ed Nemeth menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Kelly Roszko menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Wenhan Chang menu The speaker was credible and non-biased. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Hao Zuo menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Caroline Gorvin menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Ed Nemeth menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Kelly Roszko menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Wenhan Chang menu The speaker's slides were clear and concise. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Hao Zuo menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Caroline Gorvin menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Ed Nemeth menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Kelly Roszko menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Wenhan Chang menu Comments (optional) Question Title * 4. Please provide feedback on the speakers for IV. PTH PEPTIDES Karen Winer Bart Clarke Kennett Sprogøe Aliya Khan Richard DiMarchi The speaker presented information clearly. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Karen Winer menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Bart Clarke menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Kennett Sprogøe menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Aliya Khan menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Richard DiMarchi menu The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Karen Winer menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Bart Clarke menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Kennett Sprogøe menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Aliya Khan menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Richard DiMarchi menu The speaker managed time effectively. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Karen Winer menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Bart Clarke menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Kennett Sprogøe menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Aliya Khan menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Richard DiMarchi menu The speaker was credible and non-biased. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Karen Winer menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Bart Clarke menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Kennett Sprogøe menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Aliya Khan menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Richard DiMarchi menu The speaker's slides were clear and concise. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Karen Winer menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Bart Clarke menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Kennett Sprogøe menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Aliya Khan menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Richard DiMarchi menu Comments (optional) Question Title * 5. Please provide feedback on the speakers for V. PTH1R AS A TARGET Thomas Gardella Maria Luisa Brandi The speaker presented information clearly. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Thomas Gardella menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Maria Luisa Brandi menu The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Thomas Gardella menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Maria Luisa Brandi menu The speaker managed time effectively. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Thomas Gardella menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Maria Luisa Brandi menu The speaker was credible and non-biased. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Thomas Gardella menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Maria Luisa Brandi menu The speaker's slides were clear and concise. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Thomas Gardella menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Maria Luisa Brandi menu Comments (optional) Question Title * 6. Please provide feedback on the speakers for VI. CELL THERAPIES & PARATHYROID TRANSPLANT Michael Levine Diane Krause The speaker presented information clearly. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Michael Levine menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker presented information clearly. Diane Krause menu The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Michael Levine menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was engaging and knowledgeable. Diane Krause menu The speaker managed time effectively. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Michael Levine menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker managed time effectively. Diane Krause menu The speaker was credible and non-biased. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Michael Levine menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker was credible and non-biased. Diane Krause menu The speaker's slides were clear and concise. 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Michael Levine menu 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree The speaker's slides were clear and concise. Diane Krause menu Comments (optional) Question Title * 7. Were you able to identify any CanMEDS roles other than Medical Expert in the session? Check all that apply.CanMEDS roles describe the abilities physicians require to effectively meet the health care needs of the people they serve. Read more about CanMEDS. Communicator: Using a patient-centred approach Collaborator: Collaborating with other physicians and health care colleagues Leader: Demonstrating leadership in professional practice Health Advocate: Responding to a patient’s health needs by advocating with the patient within and beyond the clinical environment Scholar: Integrating best available evidence into practice Professional: Demonstrating adherence to professional and ethical codes, standards of practice, and laws governing practice None of the above Question Title * 8. Please list 3 things you will do differently as a result of attending this session. #1: #2: #3: Question Title * 9. Please rate your overall experience of Hypoparathyroidism 2025 Summit: Translating Science from the Laboratory to the Clinic: 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly agree The content was pertinent to my practice. The content was pertinent to my practice. 1-Strongly Disagree The content was pertinent to my practice. 2-Disagree The content was pertinent to my practice. 3-Neutral The content was pertinent to my practice. 4-Agree The content was pertinent to my practice. 5-Strongly agree There was adequate time for questions & interaction. There was adequate time for questions & interaction. 1-Strongly Disagree There was adequate time for questions & interaction. 2-Disagree There was adequate time for questions & interaction. 3-Neutral There was adequate time for questions & interaction. 4-Agree There was adequate time for questions & interaction. 5-Strongly agree Potential conflicts of interest were divulged. Potential conflicts of interest were divulged. 1-Strongly Disagree Potential conflicts of interest were divulged. 2-Disagree Potential conflicts of interest were divulged. 3-Neutral Potential conflicts of interest were divulged. 4-Agree Potential conflicts of interest were divulged. 5-Strongly agree Generic names were used consistently. Generic names were used consistently. 1-Strongly Disagree Generic names were used consistently. 2-Disagree Generic names were used consistently. 3-Neutral Generic names were used consistently. 4-Agree Generic names were used consistently. 5-Strongly agree I did not perceive any commercial bias. I did not perceive any commercial bias. 1-Strongly Disagree I did not perceive any commercial bias. 2-Disagree I did not perceive any commercial bias. 3-Neutral I did not perceive any commercial bias. 4-Agree I did not perceive any commercial bias. 5-Strongly agree Comments (optional) Question Title * 10. What elements did you like about the session? Question Title * 11. What elements did you dislike about the session? Question Title * 12. Please share other topic suggestions or learning needs for future sessions. Please click the "Submit" button to access the Certificate of Attendance LINK on the next page. Submit