KYACC/WKHLRFT Virtual Symposium and Scientific Meeting Continuing Education and Evaluation

We hope that you have been enjoying the KYACC/WKHLRFT Virtual Symposium and Scientific Meeting. We would love to hear your feedback!

Please complete the online survey with your comments on the sessions, presenters, and virtual conference platform.

Completing this evaluation form is also required for those attendees attaining CE.

Note: You may return to this survey link again to answer more questions, after submitting, if using the same browser. Be sure to click the DONE button at the bottom when entering new data.

Question Title

* 1. First Name

Question Title

* 2. Last Name

Question Title

* 3. Email Address

Question Title

* 4. Advances in the Treatment of Stable Angina: James Slater, MD

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 5. Nutrition and Cardiovascular Mortality: Kim A. Williams, Sr. MD, FMACC, FAHA, MASNC, FESC

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 6. Cardiac Imaging: The Silent Partner: Vincent Sorrell, MD, FACC, FACP

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 7. Navigating the Rising Tide of Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD): Walt Sobczyk, MD, FAAP, FACC

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 8. Presidential Speaker: Vivek Y. Reddy, MD

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 9. Honorable Maestro Speaker: Meryl S. Cohen, MD

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 10. ACC Speaker: Wellness/Burnout: Laxmi Mehta, MD

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 11. Cardiovascular Effects of COVID19: Ajay Kirtane, MD

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 12. On-Demand Session: Congenital Imaging Part 1

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 13. On-Demand Session: Congenital Imaging Part 2

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 14. On-Demand Session: HFpEF/Infiltrative Cardiomyopathy

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 15. On-Demand Session: EP and Other Heart Failure Topics

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 16. On-Demand Session: Interventional

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 17. On-Demand Session: EP

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 18. On-Demand Session: Oral Abstracts

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 19. On-Demand Session: Ischemia Trial: Invasive vs Medical Treatment in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 20. On-Demand Session: Antiplatelet Therapy After PCI: Updating the Updates

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 21. On-Demand Session: Pulmonary Hypertension

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Knowledge of subject	Knowledge of subject Excellent	Knowledge of subject Good	Knowledge of subject Fair	Knowledge of subject Poor	Knowledge of subject N/A
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Excellent	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation N/A
Usefulness to practice	Usefulness to practice Excellent	Usefulness to practice Good	Usefulness to practice Fair	Usefulness to practice Poor	Usefulness to practice N/A
Met stated objectives	Met stated objectives Excellent	Met stated objectives Good	Met stated objectives Fair	Met stated objectives Poor	Met stated objectives N/A
Overall ranking	Overall ranking Excellent	Overall ranking Good	Overall ranking Fair	Overall ranking Poor	Overall ranking N/A

Question Title

* 22. Was the material presented in a fair, balanced manner and free from commercial bias?

Yes

Question Title

* 23. Did any sessions have a conflict of interest? If so, please describe below.

Question Title

* 24. MEETING & SCIENTIFIC SESSION EVALUATION
Please indicate the primary reason you attended this event.

Interest in topic

Speaker reputation

Concern about impact on practice

Continuing education credits

Online/Virtual option

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 25. The overall level of the meeting was:

Too basic

Appropriate

Too complex

Question Title

* 26. This meeting met the stated learning objectives.

Agree

Somewhat agree

Somewhat disagree

Disagree

Question Title

* 27. This meeting met my educational expectations.

Agree

Somewhat agree

Somewhat disagree

Disagree

Question Title

* 28. How would you rate the following aspects of the meeting?

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Overall organization and quality	Overall organization and quality Excellent	Overall organization and quality Good	Overall organization and quality Fair	Overall organization and quality Poor	Overall organization and quality N/A
Program content	Program content Excellent	Program content Good	Program content Fair	Program content Poor	Program content N/A
Length of program	Length of program Excellent	Length of program Good	Length of program Fair	Length of program Poor	Length of program N/A
Number of presenters	Number of presenters Excellent	Number of presenters Good	Number of presenters Fair	Number of presenters Poor	Number of presenters N/A
Virtual conference platform	Virtual conference platform Excellent	Virtual conference platform Good	Virtual conference platform Fair	Virtual conference platform Poor	Virtual conference platform N/A
Date and time of activity	Date and time of activity Excellent	Date and time of activity Good	Date and time of activity Fair	Date and time of activity Poor	Date and time of activity N/A
Time allotted for Q&A	Time allotted for Q&A Excellent	Time allotted for Q&A Good	Time allotted for Q&A Fair	Time allotted for Q&A Poor	Time allotted for Q&A N/A
Promotion of the activity	Promotion of the activity Excellent	Promotion of the activity Good	Promotion of the activity Fair	Promotion of the activity Poor	Promotion of the activity N/A
Ease of registration process	Ease of registration process Excellent	Ease of registration process Good	Ease of registration process Fair	Ease of registration process Poor	Ease of registration process N/A
Helpfulness of staff	Helpfulness of staff Excellent	Helpfulness of staff Good	Helpfulness of staff Fair	Helpfulness of staff Poor	Helpfulness of staff N/A

Question Title

* 29. What effect on your professional practice will this meeting have on your ability to:

	Considerable	Moderate	None
Modify manner of scope and practice	Modify manner of scope and practice Considerable	Modify manner of scope and practice Moderate	Modify manner of scope and practice None
Improve diagnostic skills	Improve diagnostic skills Considerable	Improve diagnostic skills Moderate	Improve diagnostic skills None
Improve or change patient management approaches	Improve or change patient management approaches Considerable	Improve or change patient management approaches Moderate	Improve or change patient management approaches None
Improve your professional performance	Improve your professional performance Considerable	Improve your professional performance Moderate	Improve your professional performance None
Improve the health of your patients	Improve the health of your patients Considerable	Improve the health of your patients Moderate	Improve the health of your patients None

KYACC/WKHLRFT Virtual Symposium and Scientific Meeting Continuing Education and Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. First Name

Question Title

* 2. Last Name

Question Title

* 3. Email Address

Question Title

* 4. Advances in the Treatment of Stable Angina: James Slater, MD

Question Title

* 5. Nutrition and Cardiovascular Mortality: Kim A. Williams, Sr. MD, FMACC, FAHA, MASNC, FESC

Question Title

* 6. Cardiac Imaging: The Silent Partner: Vincent Sorrell, MD, FACC, FACP

Question Title

* 7. Navigating the Rising Tide of Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD): Walt Sobczyk, MD, FAAP, FACC

Question Title

* 8. Presidential Speaker: Vivek Y. Reddy, MD

Question Title

* 9. Honorable Maestro Speaker: Meryl S. Cohen, MD

Question Title

* 10. ACC Speaker: Wellness/Burnout: Laxmi Mehta, MD

Question Title

* 11. Cardiovascular Effects of COVID19: Ajay Kirtane, MD

Question Title

* 12. On-Demand Session: Congenital Imaging Part 1

Question Title

* 13. On-Demand Session: Congenital Imaging Part 2

Question Title

* 14. On-Demand Session: HFpEF/Infiltrative Cardiomyopathy

Question Title

* 15. On-Demand Session: EP and Other Heart Failure Topics

Question Title

* 16. On-Demand Session: Interventional

Question Title

* 17. On-Demand Session: EP

Question Title

* 18. On-Demand Session: Oral Abstracts

Question Title

* 19. On-Demand Session: Ischemia Trial: Invasive vs Medical Treatment in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

Question Title

* 20. On-Demand Session: Antiplatelet Therapy After PCI: Updating the Updates

Question Title

* 21. On-Demand Session: Pulmonary Hypertension

Question Title

* 22. Was the material presented in a fair, balanced manner and free from commercial bias?

Question Title

* 23. Did any sessions have a conflict of interest? If so, please describe below.

Question Title

* 24. MEETING & SCIENTIFIC SESSION EVALUATIONPlease indicate the primary reason you attended this event.

Question Title

* 25. The overall level of the meeting was:

Question Title

* 26. This meeting met the stated learning objectives.

Question Title

* 27. This meeting met my educational expectations.

Question Title

* 28. How would you rate the following aspects of the meeting?

Question Title

* 29. What effect on your professional practice will this meeting have on your ability to:

Question Title

* 30. Please list two or more changes in your professional competence or performance that have resulted or will result from this meeting.

Question Title

* 31. Are there any topics or speakers you would like to see at a future meeting?

Question Title

* 32. If there are barriers to implementing the information from this meeting in your professional practice, please list them.

Question Title

* 33. Please give suggestions for changes that can be made to this meeting in the future.

Question Title

* 34. Please feel free to give your comments about your overall conference experience.

* 24. MEETING & SCIENTIFIC SESSION EVALUATION
Please indicate the primary reason you attended this event.