NEW iNAPS 2016 Score Form

Focus Areas and Scoring Criteria (Instructions)

THIS IS AN UPDATED SCORING FORM.

Thank you for agreeing to participate on the selection committee for the iNAPS 2016 National Conference. 90 proposals were submitted. We are requesting you categorize and score each proposal using this form.

Note: If you need to end the session before you are finished, make a note of the last proposal you review before you click the DONE button on the Submit page. That way, you can pick up where you left off with the next proposal when you start a new session.
XX

The first time you score and each time you start a new session (new scoring sheet), you will need to enter your name. This allows us to consolidate all of your scoring sheets (behind the scenes) to ensure all of the proposals you are eligible to score have been scored.

Question Title

* Reviewer Contact Information (please enter this each time you return to submit scores)

Name *

Email Address

Phone Number *

Five Main Focus Areas

On each score sheet, you will choose the focus area that is the “best fit" for each proposal.

1)   Peer support in practice: examples from the field

2)   Peer support advanced tools, tips, and techniques: adding to the toolkit

3)   Peer support career and practice field development

4)   Peer support and the arts (engaging people through the arts)

5)   Peer support across the lifespan: youth, transition age, family

Scoring

On each score sheet, you will rate each proposal on a scale of 1-5.

1)   = not acceptable

2)   = somewhat acceptable / not strongly recommended

3)   = no opinion one way or the other

4)   = acceptable / can be recommended

5)   = strong endorsement / highly recommended (one or more exceptional factors)

If you are returning from a previous session, click the NEXT button to skip through the proposals until you reach the point where you left off.

Please skip (do not score) your own proposal or one in which you are named as a co-presenter.