Call for peers - Peer review - Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Hungary

Integrated non-urban development in Hungary

Interreg Europe Policy Learning Platform

Peer Review for Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Hungary

Location: onsite Budapest, Hungary
Date: November 24-25, 2026

Disclaimer on Personal Data Collection:
In order to comply with article 125 of regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 (Common Provisions Regulation), the Interreg Europe Policy Learning Platform is using the present survey to collect information for the purpose of preparing and implementing the expert support service of interregional onsite peer reviews. The data will be stored securely. The results of this survey will be accessed by the Policy Learning Platform team. For any further information or if you wish to exercise your right to access and / or correct your personal data, please contact us at policylearning@ext-interregeurope.eu

Question Title

1. Email adress (Required.)

Question Title

2. Your name (Required.)

Question Title

3. Your organisation (Name, Region, Country) (Required.)

Question Title

4. Your position (Required.)

Question Title

5. Your Interreg Europe Project Acronym (if any)

Question Title

6. Your LinkedIn profile

Question Title

7. Your phone number (Required.)

Question Title

8. Please describe your experience in contributing to the design, coordination or implementation of integrated rural or non-urban development strategies, including cooperation across ministries and policy areas and between national, regional and local authorities. (Required.)

Question Title

9. Please describe your experience in aligning CAP funding with national or regional cohesion policy programmes as well as territorial or other sectoral funding instruments within integrated rural/territorial development policies. (Required.)

Question Title

10. Please describe your experience in linking LEADER, Community-Led Local Development (CLLD) or comparable place-based approaches with wider national or regional policy and funding frameworks, including connecting bottom-up local initiatives with centrally defined priorities. (Required.)

Question Title

11. Please describe your broader experience with rural proofing, territorial impact assessments, rural funding targets or similar mechanisms used to ensure that rural needs are systematically reflected in policy design, programme implementation, budgeting, monitoring and investment decisions. (Required.)

Question Title

12. Please describe your experience in improving the effectiveness and operational capacity of Local Action Groups, including e.g., reducing administrative burdens, strengthening cooperation with managing authorities and supporting flexible responses to urgent local needs. (Required.)

Question Title

13. Do you have any additional relevant expertise you would like to highlight? (Required.)

Question Title

14. Please rate your knowledge on the following dimensions (Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, None): (Required.)

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	None
Integrated rural development strategies, cross-sector policy coordination and multi-level governance in rural development	Integrated rural development strategies, cross-sector policy coordination and multi-level governance in rural development Excellent	Integrated rural development strategies, cross-sector policy coordination and multi-level governance in rural development Good	Integrated rural development strategies, cross-sector policy coordination and multi-level governance in rural development Fair	Integrated rural development strategies, cross-sector policy coordination and multi-level governance in rural development Poor	Integrated rural development strategies, cross-sector policy coordination and multi-level governance in rural development None
Alignment of CAP, cohesion policy programmes and other funding instruments	Alignment of CAP, cohesion policy programmes and other funding instruments Excellent	Alignment of CAP, cohesion policy programmes and other funding instruments Good	Alignment of CAP, cohesion policy programmes and other funding instruments Fair	Alignment of CAP, cohesion policy programmes and other funding instruments Poor	Alignment of CAP, cohesion policy programmes and other funding instruments None
Integration of LEADER and CLLD with wider national/regional policy frameworks	Integration of LEADER and CLLD with wider national/regional policy frameworks Excellent	Integration of LEADER and CLLD with wider national/regional policy frameworks Good	Integration of LEADER and CLLD with wider national/regional policy frameworks Fair	Integration of LEADER and CLLD with wider national/regional policy frameworks Poor	Integration of LEADER and CLLD with wider national/regional policy frameworks None
Improving LAG effectiveness and capacity	Improving LAG effectiveness and capacity Excellent	Improving LAG effectiveness and capacity Good	Improving LAG effectiveness and capacity Fair	Improving LAG effectiveness and capacity Poor	Improving LAG effectiveness and capacity None
Rural proofing, territorial impact assessments and rural funding targets	Rural proofing, territorial impact assessments and rural funding targets Excellent	Rural proofing, territorial impact assessments and rural funding targets Good	Rural proofing, territorial impact assessments and rural funding targets Fair	Rural proofing, territorial impact assessments and rural funding targets Poor	Rural proofing, territorial impact assessments and rural funding targets None

Call for peers - Peer review - Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Hungary

Integrated non-urban development in Hungary

Question Title

* 1. Email adress (Required.)

Question Title

* 2. Your name (Required.)

Question Title

* 3. Your organisation (Name, Region, Country) (Required.)

Question Title

* 4. Your position (Required.)

Question Title

* 5. Your Interreg Europe Project Acronym (if any)

Question Title

* 6. Your LinkedIn profile

Question Title

* 7. Your phone number (Required.)

Question Title

* 8. Please describe your experience in contributing to the design, coordination or implementation of integrated rural or non-urban development strategies, including cooperation across ministries and policy areas and between national, regional and local authorities. (Required.)

Question Title

* 9. Please describe your experience in aligning CAP funding with national or regional cohesion policy programmes as well as territorial or other sectoral funding instruments within integrated rural/territorial development policies. (Required.)

Question Title

* 10. Please describe your experience in linking LEADER, Community-Led Local Development (CLLD) or comparable place-based approaches with wider national or regional policy and funding frameworks, including connecting bottom-up local initiatives with centrally defined priorities. (Required.)

Question Title

Question Title

* 12. Please describe your experience in improving the effectiveness and operational capacity of Local Action Groups, including e.g., reducing administrative burdens, strengthening cooperation with managing authorities and supporting flexible responses to urgent local needs. (Required.)

Question Title

* 13. Do you have any additional relevant expertise you would like to highlight? (Required.)

Question Title

* 14. Please rate your knowledge on the following dimensions (Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, None): (Required.)

1. Email adress (Required.)

2. Your name (Required.)

3. Your organisation (Name, Region, Country) (Required.)

4. Your position (Required.)

5. Your Interreg Europe Project Acronym (if any)

6. Your LinkedIn profile

7. Your phone number (Required.)

8. Please describe your experience in contributing to the design, coordination or implementation of integrated rural or non-urban development strategies, including cooperation across ministries and policy areas and between national, regional and local authorities. (Required.)

9. Please describe your experience in aligning CAP funding with national or regional cohesion policy programmes as well as territorial or other sectoral funding instruments within integrated rural/territorial development policies. (Required.)

10. Please describe your experience in linking LEADER, Community-Led Local Development (CLLD) or comparable place-based approaches with wider national or regional policy and funding frameworks, including connecting bottom-up local initiatives with centrally defined priorities. (Required.)

12. Please describe your experience in improving the effectiveness and operational capacity of Local Action Groups, including e.g., reducing administrative burdens, strengthening cooperation with managing authorities and supporting flexible responses to urgent local needs. (Required.)

13. Do you have any additional relevant expertise you would like to highlight? (Required.)

14. Please rate your knowledge on the following dimensions (Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, None): (Required.)