GECCO 2019 satisfaction survey
5.
Scientific aspects
1.
Please indicate your degree of satisfaction with the scientific program
Very unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Very satisfied
Structure of the conference program
Very unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Very satisfied
Scientific quality of talks
Very unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Very satisfied
Quality of best paper nominations
Very unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Very satisfied
Hot-off-the-press track
Very unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Very satisfied
Late breaking abstracts
Very unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Very satisfied
Humies
Very unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Very satisfied
Overall satisfaction with the program
Very unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Very satisfied
Comments
2.
Please indicate your degree of satisfaction with the keynote talks
Very poor
Poor
Adequate
Good
Very good
Not attended
Raia Hadsell, "Challenges for Learning in Complex Environments"
Very poor
Poor
Adequate
Good
Very good
Not attended
Robert Babuska, "Genetic Programming Methods for Reinforcement Learning"
Very poor
Poor
Adequate
Good
Very good
Not attended
Ingo Rechenberg, "Evolution, Robotics and the Somersaulting Spider"
Very poor
Poor
Adequate
Good
Very good
Not attended
Comments
3.
Would you like to give your opinion on the tutorials?
Yes
No, skip tutorials