1.How familiar are you with the financial challenges facing NCPRD?

Very familiar — I've been following this closely

Somewhat familiar — I've heard about it

Not very familiar — this is new to me

2.How important are NCPRD parks, trails, and facilities to you and your household?

Essential — we use them frequently and they matter a lot to us

Important — we use them regularly

Somewhat important — we use them occasionally

Not important to our household

3.Which NCPRD services matter most to your household? (select all that apply)

Parks and open space / trails

North Clackamas Aquatic Park

Recreation programs (sports, camps, fitness, arts)

Concord Community Center

Milwaukie Community Center

Older adult services

Natural areas and environmental stewardship

Community events

4.NCPRD's permanent tax rate of $0.54 per $1,000 of assessed value has not changed since the district was formed in 1990. Without additional revenue, the district projects it will no longer be able to sustain current operations by 2031-32. Knowing this, how supportive would you be of the district seeking additional funding from voters to maintain and sustain parks and services?

Strongly supportive

Somewhat supportive

Neutral / unsure

Somewhat opposed

Strongly opposed

5.What matters most to you in how NCPRD uses any additional funding? (select up to 2)

Maintaining and improving existing parks and trails

Restoring programs and services that have been cut

Keeping facilities like the Aquatic Park fully operational

Expanding services to underserved areas of the district

Preserving natural areas

Supporting older adult and social services

6.Is there anything else you'd like NCPRD to know as it evaluates options for long-term financial sustainability?

7.Do you live in the North Clackamas Parks and Recreation District?

Yes

No