Skip to content
3rd Year Graduate Student Seminar - Faculty Review Eval
*
1.
Speaker Name:
(Required.)
*
2.
Faculty Name:
(Required.)
Scientific Content Review:
*
3.
To what extent did the speaker clearly define the problem, explain what was novel/important about the research, and place it in context with related work?
(Required.)
Excellent
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
4.
Comments:
*
5.
To what extent did the speaker explain the data as opposed to presenting the authors’ conclusions from the data?
(Required.)
Excellent
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
6.
Comments:
*
7.
To what extent did the speaker offer independent critiques of the presented work?
(Required.)
Excellent
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
8.
Comments
*
9.
To what extent did the speaker effectively summarize the research and describe/suggest future directions?
(Required.)
Excellent
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
10.
Commets:
*
11.
To what extent did the speaker demonstrate command of the subject during the presentation and subsequent question and answer period?
(Required.)
Excellent
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
12.
Comments:
Presentation Content Review:
*
13.
Organization (unifying themes of talk elaborated, clear connection between publications and central theme, smooth flow/segues between examples).
(Required.)
Excellent
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
14.
Comments:
*
15.
Style (clarity, pace, organization, audibility, mannerisms, use of laser pointer).
(Required.)
Excellent
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
16.
Comments:
*
17.
Slides (legibility, style consistency, information density, proper literature citations, originality, (over)reliance on published figures contributions, appropriate use of animations).
(Required.)
Excellent
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
18.
Comments:
*
19.
Choose one:
(Required.)
Pass
Fail
20.
Comments:
Current Progress,
0 of 20 answered