CCWG-AP Charter Question #7 Input

Charter question #7: Should ICANN oversee the solicitation and evaluation of proposals, or delegate to or coordinate with another entity, including, for example, a foundation created for this purpose?

Question Title

* 1. Name

Question Title

* 2. Are you a member or participant? (note, this survey is not for observer. If you want to change your status to participant, please contact gnso-secs@icann.org)

Member

Participant

Question Title

* 3. Should ICANN Org oversee the solicitation of proposals, or delegate to or coordinate with another entity, including, for example, a foundation created for this purpose?

Yes, ICANN Org should directly oversee the solicitation of proposals.

No, ICANN Org should not directly oversee the solicitation of proposals but should delegate this responsibility to another entity that is to be created (noting that indirect oversight by ICANN will likely be required to meet legal and fiduciary requirements).

No, ICANN Org should not directly oversee the solicitation of proposals but should delegate/co-ordinate this responsibility to an existing entity (noting that indirect oversight by ICANN will likely be required to meet legal and fiduciary requirements).

I have no strong preference for any of the options outlined above, as long as the legal and fiduciary requirements are met.

None of the above. I use the comment box to outline my response to this question.

Comment box (in addition to providing an alternative response, you may also use this comment box to expand on one of the other responses)

Question Title

* 4. Should ICANN Org oversee the evaluation of proposals, or delegate to or coordinate with another entity, including, for example, a foundation created for this purpose?

Yes, ICANN Org should directly oversee the evaluation of proposals.

No, ICANN Org should not directly oversee the evaluation of proposals but should delegate this responsibility to another entity that is to be created (noting that indirect oversight by ICANN will likely be required to meet legal and fiduciary requirements).

No, ICANN Org should not directly oversee the evaluation of proposals but should delegate/co-ordinate this responsibility to an existing entity (noting that indirect oversight by ICANN will likely be required to meet legal and fiduciary requirements).

I have no strong preference for any of the options outlined above, as long as the legal and fiduciary requirements are met.

None of the above. I use the comment box to outline my response to this question.

Comment box (in addition to providing an alternative response, you may also use this comment box to expand on one of the other responses)

Question Title

* 5. Sub-question: Should ICANN the community be involved in the solicitation and evaluation of proposals?

Yes, ICANN community volunteers should be involved in the solicitation and evaluation of proposals

No, ICANN community volunteers should not be involved in the solicitation and evaluation of proposals

I have no strong preference for any of the options outlined above, as long as the legal and fiduciary requirements are met.

None of the above. I use the comment box to outline my response to this question.

Comment box (in addition to providing an alternative response, you may also use this comment box to expand on one of the other responses)