2021 ARNOVA Conference Evaluation

Conference Evaluation Form

We would greatly appreciate your help as we plan for next year’s conference. In order to build upon this year’s successes and improve where needed, please take a few minutes to complete this evaluation form. We thank you in advance for your comments and suggestions!

Question Title

1. I attended this year's conference:

In-person only

Virtual only

Both in-person and virtual

Question Title

2. The quality of in-person sessions was:

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

N/A

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

N/A

Comments

Question Title

3. The quality of virtual sessions was:

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

N/A

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

N/A

Comments

Question Title

4. The quality of hybrid sessions was:

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

N/A

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

N/A

Comments

Question Title

5. The diversity of topics presented in sessions was

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

Question Title

6. The Opening Session, “Reconnecting and Reflecting on 50 Years of ARNOVA” was:

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

N/A

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

N/A

Comments

Question Title

7. The Awards Luncheon was:

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

N/A

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

N/A

Comments

Question Title

8. The Virtual Reception (Friday evening) was:

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

N/A

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

N/A

Comments

Question Title

9. For presenters only, what did you think about:

	Outstanding	Good	Neutral	Poor	N/A
Quality of feedback	Quality of feedback Outstanding	Quality of feedback Good	Quality of feedback Neutral	Quality of feedback Poor	Quality of feedback N/A
Proposal submission process	Proposal submission process Outstanding	Proposal submission process Good	Proposal submission process Neutral	Proposal submission process Poor	Proposal submission process N/A
Presenting virtually	Presenting virtually Outstanding	Presenting virtually Good	Presenting virtually Neutral	Presenting virtually Poor	Presenting virtually N/A
Presenting in person	Presenting in person Outstanding	Presenting in person Good	Presenting in person Neutral	Presenting in person Poor	Presenting in person N/A
Presenting in hybrid room	Presenting in hybrid room Outstanding	Presenting in hybrid room Good	Presenting in hybrid room Neutral	Presenting in hybrid room Poor	Presenting in hybrid room N/A

Comments

Question Title

10. Overall, the content presented at this conference was:

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

Outstanding

Good

Neutral

Poor

Question Title

* 1. I attended this year's conference:

Question Title

* 2. The quality of in-person sessions was:

Question Title

* 3. The quality of virtual sessions was:

Question Title

* 4. The quality of hybrid sessions was:

Question Title

* 5. The diversity of topics presented in sessions was

Question Title

* 6. The Opening Session, “Reconnecting and Reflecting on 50 Years of ARNOVA” was:

Question Title

* 7. The Awards Luncheon was:

Question Title

* 8. The Virtual Reception (Friday evening) was:

Question Title

* 9. For presenters only, what did you think about:

Question Title

* 10. Overall, the content presented at this conference was:

1. I attended this year's conference:

2. The quality of in-person sessions was:

3. The quality of virtual sessions was:

4. The quality of hybrid sessions was:

5. The diversity of topics presented in sessions was

6. The Opening Session, “Reconnecting and Reflecting on 50 Years of ARNOVA” was:

7. The Awards Luncheon was:

8. The Virtual Reception (Friday evening) was:

9. For presenters only, what did you think about:

10. Overall, the content presented at this conference was: