TICP Year 1 Fall 2010

1. Default Section

Please make sure you complete each survey in FULL. It is very important to complete Question 1 to identify yourself, in order to track completed evaluations.

Please be sure to click "DONE" when you are finished the survey. It will be sent automatically.

***NOTE***
Each instructor necessitates a separate evaluation for each module they teach; these evaluations are not broken down only by course. There will be times when you are evaluating the same instructor several times for different courses they have taught.

If you have any questions or encounter difficulties, please advise me by email to suzanne_pearen@rogers.com or call 416-288-8060.

Question Title

* 1. Please identify yourself:

Adina Balint-Bados

Kelly Dickeson

Mitra Gholamain

Christiane Martin

Marilyn McCallum

Lori Ralko

Question Title

* 2. Please indicate which TICP Instructor you are evaluating:

Brent Willock

Sam Izenberg

Karl Loszak

Gail White

Marsha Hewitt

Art Caspary

Marsha Hewitt/Brent Willock (as co-teachers)

Donald Carveth

Dan Merkur

Kadri-Ann Laar

Keith Haartman

Judi Kobrick

Kadri-Ann Laar / Keith Haartman (as co-teachers)

Question Title

* 3. Please indicate which TICP Fall 2010 Course you are evaluating:

Introduction to Comparative Integrative Psychoanalysis

Introduction to Ethics

Freud

Transitional Figures

Object Relations

Question Title

* 4. Please evaluate the seminar/instructor you have indicated above by using the following rating system:

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent	N/A
Usefulness of clinical material	Usefulness of clinical material Poor	Usefulness of clinical material Fair	Usefulness of clinical material Good	Usefulness of clinical material Excellent	Usefulness of clinical material N/A
Clinical applications of material	Clinical applications of material Poor	Clinical applications of material Fair	Clinical applications of material Good	Clinical applications of material Excellent	Clinical applications of material N/A
Usefulness of discussion	Usefulness of discussion Poor	Usefulness of discussion Fair	Usefulness of discussion Good	Usefulness of discussion Excellent	Usefulness of discussion N/A
Encouragement / Facilitation of candidate participation	Encouragement / Facilitation of candidate participation Poor	Encouragement / Facilitation of candidate participation Fair	Encouragement / Facilitation of candidate participation Good	Encouragement / Facilitation of candidate participation Excellent	Encouragement / Facilitation of candidate participation N/A
Comparative / Integrative Focus	Comparative / Integrative Focus Poor	Comparative / Integrative Focus Fair	Comparative / Integrative Focus Good	Comparative / Integrative Focus Excellent	Comparative / Integrative Focus N/A
Readings	Readings Poor	Readings Fair	Readings Good	Readings Excellent	Readings N/A
Organization	Organization Poor	Organization Fair	Organization Good	Organization Excellent	Organization N/A
Clarity	Clarity Poor	Clarity Fair	Clarity Good	Clarity Excellent	Clarity N/A

Question Title

* 1. Please identify yourself:

Question Title

* 2. Please indicate which TICP Instructor you are evaluating:

Question Title

* 3. Please indicate which TICP Fall 2010 Course you are evaluating:

Question Title

* 4. Please evaluate the seminar/instructor you have indicated above by using the following rating system:

Question Title

* 5. If you have any additional comments, please feel free to indicate them below: