This is the first of two questionnaires. Please try to answer all the questions. Where appropriate, space has been provided for comments. Once we have received responses from all the experts, we will collate and summarise the results and formulate the second questionnaire.

Question Title

* 1. Experience using the Montreal Protocol for the Evaluation of Communication (MEC)
Please select as many options as apply.

Question Title

* 2. Expertise
Please describe your expertise as a speech pathologist briefly (e.g. years of clinical experience, research experience, current or prior work roles/position).

Question Title

* 3. Geographic location
Please indicate where you live and work.

Question Title

* 4. MEC Components that should be retained.
Which of the following components of the MEC should be retained in a screening version?

Question Title

* 5. Additions.
Are there aspects of cognitive-communication disorders that are not evaluated by the MEC which should be included in a screening version?

Question Title

* 6. What is your opinion on the strengths and weaknesses of the MEC?
You may wish to comment on the usability (e.g. ease of administration and/or  scoring; administration time) and clinical utility (ability to identify cognitive-communication disorders; to inform goal setting; and to detect change over time)?

Question Title

* 7. Other thoughts and suggestions?
Please feel free to share other thoughts about the creation of a screening version of the MEC.

Question Title

* 8. Please provide your email via the below link or text box. 
A second survey will be emailed to you in a few week's time with a summary of all participants' responses on the first survey, and will again ask your opinion on essential test items for inclusion in the Pocket MEC.

Please access this link to participate in the second survey.


0 of 8 answered
 

T