SurveyMonkey Powered Online Survey

2022 Virtual MS Summit

We would appreciate your evaluation of this program, as well as your suggestions for improvements in order to assist in the planning of future programs. Thank you.

Question Title

* 1. How likely are you to recommend this program to a colleague?

1 = not likely at all; 10 = extremely likely

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 2. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with this program?

1 = not at all satisfied; 10 = extremely satisfied

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 3. Based on your experience, are you likely to attend another program sponsored by the National MS Society?

Yes

Question Title

* 4. The program's stated learning and educational objectives were met.

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Question Title

* 5. The program's content will enhance my professional practice and competence in treating and caring for individuals living with MS.

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Question Title

* 6. As a result of my participation in the program, I plan to: (select all that apply)

Modify existing or implement new patient screening and/or evaluation practices

Modify existing, implement new or recommend different diagnostic procedures

Modify existing, implement new or recommend different approaches and/or treatment modalities

Provide and/or direct patients or caregivers to new information or resources

Pursue strategies for more effective patient-provider communications

Pursue strategies to infuse more personalization into treatment plans

Maintain the status quo (i.e., this program validated that my current practices are aligned with the most recent guidelines and standards of care)

I do not currently provide clinical care to individuals with MS

Question Title

* 7. Did this program actively present clinical information and models of treatment and care free from commercial bias and/or promotion?

Yes

Question Title

* 8. Location & Date of the program:

Name of venue (enter webinar for online programs)

City

State

Date of program

Question Title

* 9. Select your healthcare discipline:

Advanced Practice Provider

MS Specialist

Neurologist

Neuropsychologist

Nurse (other)

Occupational Therapist

Pharmacist

Physical Therapist

Physician (other)

Psychiatrist

Psychologist / Counselor

Registered Nurse

Rehabilitation Physician

Social Work

Speech & Language Therapist

Urologist

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 10. Please rate Jennifer Graves, MD, PhD for "Aging in MS"

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Content (accurate/up to date?)	Content (accurate/up to date?) Excellent	Content (accurate/up to date?) Very Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Fair	Content (accurate/up to date?) Poor	Content (accurate/up to date?) N/A
Clarity and organization of presentation	Clarity and organization of presentation Excellent	Clarity and organization of presentation Very Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Fair	Clarity and organization of presentation Poor	Clarity and organization of presentation N/A
Usefulness of presentation content	Usefulness of presentation content Excellent	Usefulness of presentation content Very Good	Usefulness of presentation content Good	Usefulness of presentation content Fair	Usefulness of presentation content Poor	Usefulness of presentation content N/A
Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.)	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Excellent	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Very Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Fair	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Poor	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) N/A
Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Excellent	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Very Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Fair	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Poor	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience N/A
Overall teaching effectiveness	Overall teaching effectiveness Excellent	Overall teaching effectiveness Very Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Fair	Overall teaching effectiveness Poor	Overall teaching effectiveness N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 11. Please rate Joe Stuckey, MD, CRC for "Employment and MS"

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Content (accurate/up to date?)	Content (accurate/up to date?) Excellent	Content (accurate/up to date?) Very Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Fair	Content (accurate/up to date?) Poor	Content (accurate/up to date?) N/A
Clarity and organization of presentation	Clarity and organization of presentation Excellent	Clarity and organization of presentation Very Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Fair	Clarity and organization of presentation Poor	Clarity and organization of presentation N/A
Usefulness of presentation content	Usefulness of presentation content Excellent	Usefulness of presentation content Very Good	Usefulness of presentation content Good	Usefulness of presentation content Fair	Usefulness of presentation content Poor	Usefulness of presentation content N/A
Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.)	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Excellent	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Very Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Fair	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Poor	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) N/A
Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Excellent	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Very Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Fair	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Poor	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience N/A
Overall teaching effectiveness	Overall teaching effectiveness Excellent	Overall teaching effectiveness Very Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Fair	Overall teaching effectiveness Poor	Overall teaching effectiveness N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 12. Please rate Nina Bozinov, MD for "Disease Modifying Therapies in MS"

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Content (accurate/up to date?)	Content (accurate/up to date?) Excellent	Content (accurate/up to date?) Very Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Fair	Content (accurate/up to date?) Poor	Content (accurate/up to date?) N/A
Clarity and organization of presentation	Clarity and organization of presentation Excellent	Clarity and organization of presentation Very Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Fair	Clarity and organization of presentation Poor	Clarity and organization of presentation N/A
Usefulness of presentation content	Usefulness of presentation content Excellent	Usefulness of presentation content Very Good	Usefulness of presentation content Good	Usefulness of presentation content Fair	Usefulness of presentation content Poor	Usefulness of presentation content N/A
Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.)	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Excellent	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Very Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Fair	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Poor	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) N/A
Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Excellent	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Very Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Fair	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Poor	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience N/A
Overall teaching effectiveness	Overall teaching effectiveness Excellent	Overall teaching effectiveness Very Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Fair	Overall teaching effectiveness Poor	Overall teaching effectiveness N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 13. Please rate Ariana Tart-Zelvin, PhD for "Cognition and MS"

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Content (accurate/up to date?)	Content (accurate/up to date?) Excellent	Content (accurate/up to date?) Very Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Fair	Content (accurate/up to date?) Poor	Content (accurate/up to date?) N/A
Clarity and organization of presentation	Clarity and organization of presentation Excellent	Clarity and organization of presentation Very Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Fair	Clarity and organization of presentation Poor	Clarity and organization of presentation N/A
Usefulness of presentation content	Usefulness of presentation content Excellent	Usefulness of presentation content Very Good	Usefulness of presentation content Good	Usefulness of presentation content Fair	Usefulness of presentation content Poor	Usefulness of presentation content N/A
Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.)	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Excellent	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Very Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Fair	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Poor	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) N/A
Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Excellent	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Very Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Fair	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Poor	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience N/A
Overall teaching effectiveness	Overall teaching effectiveness Excellent	Overall teaching effectiveness Very Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Fair	Overall teaching effectiveness Poor	Overall teaching effectiveness N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 14. Please rate Darin Okuda, MD for "Radiology in MS"

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Content (accurate/up to date?)	Content (accurate/up to date?) Excellent	Content (accurate/up to date?) Very Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Fair	Content (accurate/up to date?) Poor	Content (accurate/up to date?) N/A
Clarity and organization of presentation	Clarity and organization of presentation Excellent	Clarity and organization of presentation Very Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Fair	Clarity and organization of presentation Poor	Clarity and organization of presentation N/A
Usefulness of presentation content	Usefulness of presentation content Excellent	Usefulness of presentation content Very Good	Usefulness of presentation content Good	Usefulness of presentation content Fair	Usefulness of presentation content Poor	Usefulness of presentation content N/A
Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.)	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Excellent	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Very Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Fair	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Poor	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) N/A
Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Excellent	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Very Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Fair	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Poor	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience N/A
Overall teaching effectiveness	Overall teaching effectiveness Excellent	Overall teaching effectiveness Very Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Fair	Overall teaching effectiveness Poor	Overall teaching effectiveness N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 15. Please rate Angeli Mayadev, MD for "Neurogenic Bowel"

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Content (accurate/up to date?)	Content (accurate/up to date?) Excellent	Content (accurate/up to date?) Very Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Fair	Content (accurate/up to date?) Poor	Content (accurate/up to date?) N/A
Clarity and organization of presentation	Clarity and organization of presentation Excellent	Clarity and organization of presentation Very Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Fair	Clarity and organization of presentation Poor	Clarity and organization of presentation N/A
Usefulness of presentation content	Usefulness of presentation content Excellent	Usefulness of presentation content Very Good	Usefulness of presentation content Good	Usefulness of presentation content Fair	Usefulness of presentation content Poor	Usefulness of presentation content N/A
Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.)	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Excellent	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Very Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Fair	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Poor	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) N/A
Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Excellent	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Very Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Fair	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Poor	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience N/A
Overall teaching effectiveness	Overall teaching effectiveness Excellent	Overall teaching effectiveness Very Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Fair	Overall teaching effectiveness Poor	Overall teaching effectiveness N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 16. Please rate Gloria von Geldern, MD for "MS and Covid Update"

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Content (accurate/up to date?)	Content (accurate/up to date?) Excellent	Content (accurate/up to date?) Very Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Fair	Content (accurate/up to date?) Poor	Content (accurate/up to date?) N/A
Clarity and organization of presentation	Clarity and organization of presentation Excellent	Clarity and organization of presentation Very Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Fair	Clarity and organization of presentation Poor	Clarity and organization of presentation N/A
Usefulness of presentation content	Usefulness of presentation content Excellent	Usefulness of presentation content Very Good	Usefulness of presentation content Good	Usefulness of presentation content Fair	Usefulness of presentation content Poor	Usefulness of presentation content N/A
Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.)	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Excellent	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Very Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Fair	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Poor	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) N/A
Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Excellent	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Very Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Fair	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Poor	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience N/A
Overall teaching effectiveness	Overall teaching effectiveness Excellent	Overall teaching effectiveness Very Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Fair	Overall teaching effectiveness Poor	Overall teaching effectiveness N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 17. Please rate Aaron Turner, PhD, ABPP for "Motivational Interviewing and MS"

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Content (accurate/up to date?)	Content (accurate/up to date?) Excellent	Content (accurate/up to date?) Very Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Good	Content (accurate/up to date?) Fair	Content (accurate/up to date?) Poor	Content (accurate/up to date?) N/A
Clarity and organization of presentation	Clarity and organization of presentation Excellent	Clarity and organization of presentation Very Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Good	Clarity and organization of presentation Fair	Clarity and organization of presentation Poor	Clarity and organization of presentation N/A
Usefulness of presentation content	Usefulness of presentation content Excellent	Usefulness of presentation content Very Good	Usefulness of presentation content Good	Usefulness of presentation content Fair	Usefulness of presentation content Poor	Usefulness of presentation content N/A
Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.)	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Excellent	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Very Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Good	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Fair	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) Poor	Use of instructional resource (powerpoint, video, etc.) N/A
Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Excellent	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Very Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Good	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Fair	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience Poor	Enthusiasm and stimulation of audience N/A
Overall teaching effectiveness	Overall teaching effectiveness Excellent	Overall teaching effectiveness Very Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Good	Overall teaching effectiveness Fair	Overall teaching effectiveness Poor	Overall teaching effectiveness N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 1. How likely are you to recommend this program to a colleague?

Question Title

* 2. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with this program?

Question Title

* 3. Based on your experience, are you likely to attend another program sponsored by the National MS Society?

Question Title

* 4. The program's stated learning and educational objectives were met.

Question Title

* 5. The program's content will enhance my professional practice and competence in treating and caring for individuals living with MS.

Question Title

* 6. As a result of my participation in the program, I plan to: (select all that apply)

Question Title

* 7. Did this program actively present clinical information and models of treatment and care free from commercial bias and/or promotion?

Question Title

* 8. Location & Date of the program:

Question Title

* 9. Select your healthcare discipline:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate Jennifer Graves, MD, PhD for "Aging in MS"

Question Title

* 11. Please rate Joe Stuckey, MD, CRC for "Employment and MS"

Question Title

* 12. Please rate Nina Bozinov, MD for "Disease Modifying Therapies in MS"

Question Title

* 13. Please rate Ariana Tart-Zelvin, PhD for "Cognition and MS"

Question Title

* 14. Please rate Darin Okuda, MD for "Radiology in MS"

Question Title

* 15. Please rate Angeli Mayadev, MD for "Neurogenic Bowel"

Question Title

* 16. Please rate Gloria von Geldern, MD for "MS and Covid Update"

Question Title

* 17. Please rate Aaron Turner, PhD, ABPP for "Motivational Interviewing and MS"

Question Title

* 18. Suggestions for any specific lectures/topics that you would like covered in future activities: