Question Title

* 1. ABC Twine Company sends a shipment of U.S. made spools of polyethylene monofilament twisted rope to India to be cut into shorter lengths. The Indian company charges a fee for this service. The classification of the rope is predicated upon its diameter; therefore the classification remains the same upon its return back to ABC in the United States. Would the rope qualify for duty free entry as U.S. goods returned under subheading 9801.00.10 upon importation into the U.S. provided the documentary requirements of 19 CFR 10.1 are satisfied, and no drawback claims had been made?

Question Title

* 2. An importer is claiming duty free entry under 9801.00.10 for a shipment valued at $3,000. The articles are not clearly marked with the name and address of the U.S. manufacturer. The importer provides a NAFTA certificate of origin which indicates that the United States is the country of origin of the imported merchandise, but does not provide a foreign shipper declaration. True or False: The CBP may waive the documentation requirements provided the port director is reasonably satisfied that the certificate substantiates the importer’s claim for preferential treatment under subheading 9801.00.10.

Question Title

* 3. The person making entry shall show on Declaration for Free Entry of Returned American Products (the CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent) all of the following except:

Question Title

* 4. Audio amplifiers are imported into the United States by ABC Electronics from a manufacturer in Thailand, and U.S. Customs duties are paid. They are stored in the company’s warehouse. Four years later the same amplifiers are re-exported to a buyer in Mexico. The buyer returns the goods to ABC because they do not conform to the buyer’s specifications. True or False: With the proper required documentation, ABC Electronics should be able to claim duty free entry under 9801.00.25.

Question Title

* 5. Which of the following would be NOT be considered an acceptable “assembly operation" to qualify for 9802.00.80?

Question Title

* 6. Which of the following would be considered “incidental” to the assembly process to qualify for 9802.00.80?

Question Title

* 7. Articles exported from and returned to the U.S., after having been advanced in value or improved in condition by repairs or alterations, may qualify for a duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, provided:

Question Title

* 8. A United States company intends to import replica flight suits and jackets from Mexico into the U.S. The garments will be assembled in Mexico from U.S.-designed and cut fabric components. The apparel will be marked "Made in Mexico" on the neck label.True or False: The imported garments will be eligible for a partial duty exemption under 9802.00.80.

Question Title

* 9. Which of the following is correct regarding the determination of the value for duty on imported goods assembled from U.S. components?

Question Title

* 10. A plastic injection mold valued at $10,000 USD, is being returned temporarily to the U.S. manufacturer to be repaired under warranty and then re-exported. Which Chapter 98 subheading could be used?

Question Title

* 11. Which of the following documents are required for the entry of articles which are returned after having been exported for repairs or alterations under warranty and which are claimed to be subject to duty only on the value of the repairs or alterations performed abroad?

Question Title

* 12. A shipment of U.S. origin goods, valued at over $2,500, has not had benefit of drawback, has not been advanced in value or improved in condition while outside the U.S., and is being returned to the original exporter. A proper Foreign Shipper’s Declaration and an Owner, IOR, agent or consignee declaration has been provided. Would this shipment be eligible for duty-free treatment under subheading 9801.00.10?

Question Title

* 13. A craft brewery produces and bottles their own line of stouts and porters in the United States in a Customs bonded warehouse. A $50,000 shipment previously exported to Ireland is returned to the U.S. brewer because the beer did not meet labeling specifications. Provided no drawback was claimed, can the brewer/importer claim duty free entry under 9801.00.10?

Question Title

* 14. Foxy Lady Company sends a $200,000 shipment of raw Native American Silver Fox skins outside the U.S. to be dressed. The U.S. fur company provides $50,000 worth of tools to assist in the dressing process. Upon return, the U.S. fur company claims duty free entry under 9802.00.50 on the value of the foreign alterations valued at $100,000, and provides all the necessary documentation. What is the assessment of duty on the value of alterations if raw skins are classified under subheading 4301 .60.3000 / 5.1% and dressed fox skins under subheading 4302.19.1500 / 5.6%?

Question Title

* 15. New pneumatic radial and bias tires are imported into the U.S. and any duties owed are paid by Good Stone Tires in the U.S. Within the year, certain tires from this shipment are exported to Canada where they do not undergo processing or any manufacture. Good Stone reimports some tires for repair due to lack of demand. Would this shipment be eligible for duty-free treatment under subheading 9801.00.25, if documentary requirements are met?

T