Exit this survey

Early Career Member Lunch

Presenter Information & Speaker Evaluation

33% of survey complete.

Question Title

* 1. Please evaluate the speaker:

	Excellent	Good	Average	Fair	Poor
Michael Silacci, Opus One, California	Michael Silacci, Opus One, California Excellent	Michael Silacci, Opus One, California Good	Michael Silacci, Opus One, California Average	Michael Silacci, Opus One, California Fair	Michael Silacci, Opus One, California Poor

Question Title

* 2. Comments on the speaker:

Question Title

* 3. Please rate the following information:

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree	N/A
Presenter was well prepared and organized.	Presenter was well prepared and organized. Strongly Agree	Presenter was well prepared and organized. Agree	Presenter was well prepared and organized. Neutral	Presenter was well prepared and organized. Disagree	Presenter was well prepared and organized. Strongly Disagree	Presenter was well prepared and organized. N/A
Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter.	Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Strongly Agree	Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Agree	Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Neutral	Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Disagree	Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Strongly Disagree	Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. N/A
Presenter's style was clear and effective.	Presenter's style was clear and effective. Strongly Agree	Presenter's style was clear and effective. Agree	Presenter's style was clear and effective. Neutral	Presenter's style was clear and effective. Disagree	Presenter's style was clear and effective. Strongly Disagree	Presenter's style was clear and effective. N/A
Presenter stimulated interest and discussion.	Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Strongly Agree	Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Agree	Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Neutral	Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Disagree	Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Strongly Disagree	Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. N/A
Presenter was responsive to participants.	Presenter was responsive to participants. Strongly Agree	Presenter was responsive to participants. Agree	Presenter was responsive to participants. Neutral	Presenter was responsive to participants. Disagree	Presenter was responsive to participants. Strongly Disagree	Presenter was responsive to participants. N/A
The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided.	The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Strongly Agree	The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Agree	The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Neutral	The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Disagree	The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Strongly Disagree	The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. N/A
Objectives were clearly stated.	Objectives were clearly stated. Strongly Agree	Objectives were clearly stated. Agree	Objectives were clearly stated. Neutral	Objectives were clearly stated. Disagree	Objectives were clearly stated. Strongly Disagree	Objectives were clearly stated. N/A