Skip to content
2025 SPE TPO Global Automotive Conference
*
1.
Which of the following categories best fits your company?
(Required.)
Automotive OEM
Tier 1/2/3 Part or Component Manufacturer and Supplier
Resin Producer/Supplier
Material Compound Supplier
Raw Materials Supplier (Other than Resins and Compounds)
Equipment/Tooling Supplier
CAE or Other Supplier
Testing Provider
Academia
Research Institute
Media
Other (please specify)
*
2.
Please indicate your participation status at the 2025 Conference.(Select all that apply)
(Required.)
Attendee
Speaker
Sponsor
Exhibitor
Conference Planning Committee Member
SPE Detroit Section Member
SPE Automotive Division Board Member
Student
Other (please specify)
3.
How did you find out about the 2025 Conference?
Already knew about it from previous attendance
"Word of Mouth" from Industry Contact
Emailed E-Blasts
Social Media Postings (i.e. LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
Trade Journal Advertisement
Other SPE Event where it was posted
Google Search
Other (please specify)
*
4.
Is this the first year you participated in any capacity at the Conference?
(Required.)
Yes
No
5.
Please rate the effectiveness of the promotional communication used to advertise the 2025 Conference - answer any or all that apply
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
- Conference Website (www.auto-tpo.com)
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
- Social Media (i.e. LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
- Emailed E-Blasts
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
- Traditional Advertising in other Publications or other SPE Events
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
6.
Please rate the ease and effectiveness of the 2025 Conference registration process.
o Unacceptable
o Poor
o Adequate
o Good
o Excellent
7.
If you are an Exhibitor (or Exhibiting Sponsor), please rate the overall value of the Conference vs. sponsorship or exhibitor costs
Poor or Below Average Value
Good Value
High Value
Any additional comments or suggestions
8.
Please enter the date for which you are providing feedback (All that apply)
Monday – September 29
Tuesday – September 30
Wednesday – October 1
9.
How do you rate the overall experience of the Keynote Speakers?
Unacceptable
Poor
Fair/Adequate
Good
Excellent
Tuesday - Ramesh Iyer - Independent Commodity Intelligence Services
Unacceptable
Poor
Fair/Adequate
Good
Excellent
Wednesday - Jan Kalfus PhD. - S&P Global Commodity Insights
Unacceptable
Poor
Fair/Adequate
Good
Excellent
Wednesday - Dr. Hendrik Mainka - VW Group of America, Inc.
Unacceptable
Poor
Fair/Adequate
Good
Excellent
Other (please specify)
10.
Forum/Panel Discussion Feedback
Poor Value
Adequate
Good
Excellent Value
Tuesday
Poor Value
Adequate
Good
Excellent Value
Wednesday
Poor Value
Adequate
Good
Excellent Value
Comments regarding Forum/Panel rating feedback:
11.
Please Rate Overall the Technical Sessions that you attended
Unacceptable
Poor
Fair/Adequate
Good
Excellent
Exterior Trim & Structural Applications
Unacceptable
Poor
Fair/Adequate
Good
Excellent
Sustainability
Unacceptable
Poor
Fair/Adequate
Good
Excellent
Polyolefin Elastomers & Vulcanizates
Unacceptable
Poor
Fair/Adequate
Good
Excellent
Process Enabling & Additive Technologies
Unacceptable
Poor
Fair/Adequate
Good
Excellent
Innovations in Interiors
Unacceptable
Poor
Fair/Adequate
Good
Excellent
Material Development
Unacceptable
Poor
Fair/Adequate
Good
Excellent
Performance Additives & Colorants
Unacceptable
Poor
Fair/Adequate
Good
Excellent
12.
If you have any suggestions regarding how we could improve the existing Technical Sessions in the future, or if there are new sessions or topic areas you’d like to see, or different ways to present, please enter them in the box below.
13.
Please rate the following aspects of the Conference Exhibition:
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
- Hotel Facility for the Exhibit Area
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
- Placement of the Exhibitors
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
- Ease of Movement in Exhibitor Areas
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
- Number of Exhibitors
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
- Relevance of the Exhibitors
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
- Ability to Have a Discussion in Exhibit Areas
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Other (please specify)
14.
Did the Networking Opportunities at the conference meet with your expectations?
Did not Meet Expectation
Met Expectations
Exceeded Expectations
Suggestions for Other Networking opportunities
15.
Are you planning on participating in this Conference in 2026?
Yes
No
16.
If you have any suggestions regarding how we could improve the Conference in the future, please enter them in the box below.
17.
Provide a nickname if you would like to be entered for a Raffle Prize! (anything appropriate that you will be able to Identify during Raffle callout)
