What is this questionnaire about?
The Fort Pickett Maneuver Training Center (MTC) Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) is a collaborative planning effort conducted with Brunswick, Dinwiddie, and Nottaway counties, the Town of Blackstone, Fort Pickett MTC, and other affected stakeholders.

The purpose of the JLUS is to promote compatible land use near Fort Pickett MTC, support regional growth and economic development compatible with the military mission, protect public safety and quality of life, and protect mission capability at Fort Pickett MTC now and into the future.

The Ft Pickett MTC JLUS project utilized 25 compatibility factors to assess compatibility within the Study Area. Of the 25 compatibility factors assessed, 18 compatibility factors were found to have issues and a total of 45 compatibility issues were identified. This questionnaire asks the community for input on the timeframe each issue should be addressed. For each compatibility issue, provide your input on the timeframe the issue should be addressed by selecting one of the following:

Near-term (1-3 years): The issue is an immediate concern and should be addressed as soon as possible

Long-term (3 years +): This issue is a long-term concern and may require additional resources to address

On-going: This issue will require on-going measures to address

No Opinion: You do not have enough information to determine the timeframe

Question Title

* 1. COM-1: Concern that State Department FASTC Complex does not engage with Fort Pickett MTC or community for Mutual Aid.

Question Title

* 2. COM-2: Need for communication between Fort Pickett MTC and Brunswick County.

Question Title

* 3. COM-3: Need for multi-jurisdiction communication and coordination for regional planning involving Fort Pickett MTC.

Question Title

* 4. COM-4: Concern with the ability of jurisdictions and Fort Pickett MTC to communicate during Emergency Operations.

Question Title

* 5. COM-5: Need for enhanced community education of Fort Pickett MTC Missions and Operations.

Question Title

* 6. COM-6: Need for enhanced wireless capability on portions of Fort Pickett MTC and surrounding communities.

Question Title

* 7. COM-7: Need for a formal process to coordinate planning documents.

Question Title

* 8. COM-8: Need to formalize coordination through Memorandums of Agreement.

Question Title

* 9. COM-9: Concerns with Corridor Airspace Route Structure.

Question Title

* 10. HA-1: Limited housing opportunities near Fort Pickett MTC.

Question Title

* 11. HA-2: Limited temporary lodging opportunities near Fort Pickett MTC.

Question Title

* 12. LEG-1: Need for Real Estate Disclosure to include noise and smoke from Military Range Activities.

Question Title

* 13. PS-1: Need for Regional Emergency Trauma Services facility.

Question Title

* 14. PS-2: Concerns with public services support due to FASTC requirements.

Question Title

* 15. PT-1: Concern with public trespassing on Fort Pickett.

Question Title

* 16. LAS-1: Opportunities at Dinwiddie County Airport.

Question Title

* 17. LAS-2: Need to protect operational capability at Allen C. Perkinson Blackstone AAF.

Question Title

* 18. LAS-3: Perception of Army Compatible Use Buffers.

Question Title

* 19. RE-1: Stormwater on the airfield runways and taxiways.

Question Title

* 20. WQQ-1: Concern regarding potable water and wastewater capacity limitations.

Question Title

* 21. WQQ-2: Concern for aging water and wastewater infrastructure on Fort Pickett MTC.

Question Title

* 22. AT/FP-1: Fort Pickett MTC Operational Ranges visible from Highway 40.

Question Title

* 23. AT/FP-2: Need for improved signage along Fort Pickett MTC perimeter boundary.

Question Title

* 24. AT/FP-3: Concern with access to Fort Pickett MTC.

Question Title

* 25. DSS-1: Concerns with smoke from Range operations along Highway 40.

Question Title

* 26. DSS-2: Concern and complaints of smoke from fires on Fort Pickett MTC in Dinwiddie County.

Question Title

* 27. ED-1: Need to coordinate future siting of Solar Energy Facilities.

Question Title

* 28. IE-1: Limited infrastructure impacts development potential near Fort Pickett MTC.

Question Title

* 29. LU-1: Potential development close to Fort Pickett MTC boundary.

Question Title

* 30. LU-2: Stormwater and sedimentation impacts to Fort Pickett MTC from off-installation locations.

Question Title

* 31. LU-3: Airport Safety Zone Overlay Districts do not address Imaginary Surfaces.

Question Title

* 32. LU-4: Airport Safety Zone Overlay District does not address Safety Zones.

Question Title

* 33. LU-5: Zoning Maps do not reference the Airport Safety Zone Overlay District.

Question Title

* 34. NOI-1: Noise impacts from helicopters operating at Fort Pickett MTC.

Question Title

* 35. NOI-2: Noise from military aircraft overflights of the Town of Blackstone.

Question Title

* 36. NOI-3: Noise impacts from blasting at Fort Pickett MTC gravel sites.

Question Title

* 37. NOI-4: Incompatible land uses in Fort Pickett MTC Noise Zones.

Question Title

* 38. RC-1: Concerns with traffic attempting to access the installation via incorrect gate.

Question Title

* 39. RC-2: Concern with impacts to roadways in the Town of Blackstone.

Question Title

* 40. SA-1: Concerns with traffic safety at Fort Pickett MTC Main Gate.

Question Title

* 41. SA-2: Concerns with traffic and pedestrians Along Highway 40.

Question Title

* 42. SA-3: Concern with Fire Department response time to Support Allen C. Perkinson Airport Blackstone AAF.

Question Title

* 43. SA-4: Concern with zoning and future land use in airfield Safety Zones.

Question Title

* 44. VO-1: Need for development height restrictions near Allen C. Perkinson Airport Blackstone AAF.

Question Title

* 45. V-1: Concern with vibrations from Fort Pickett MTC Operations.

T