Skip to content
Grapevine Leafroll and Vitivirus Diseases Seminar Survey
Presenter Information & Speaker Evaluation
33%
1.
Please evaluate each speaker.
(speakers listed alphabetically)
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Rodrigo Almeida
, University of California, Berkeley
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Shadi Atallah
, Cornell University, New York
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Kent Daane
, University of California, Berkeley
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Marc Fuchs
, Cornell University, New York
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Deborah Golino
, University of California, Davis
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Jim Harbertson
, Washington State University, Prosser
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Vicki Klaassen
, University of California, Davis
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Giovanni Martelli
, Università di Bari “Aldo Moro”, Italy (Keynote Speaker)
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Neil McRoberts
, University of California, Davis (Morning Moderator)
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Sara Spayd
, North Carolina State University, Raleigh (Afternoon Moderator)
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
2.
Comments On Specific Speaker(s):
Please include speaker name(s).
3.
Please rate the following information.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters were well prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters’ style was clear and effective.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters stimulated interest and discussion.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters were responsive to participants.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Visual aids were useful and appropriate.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
The content was consistent with the description.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Objectives were clearly stated.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
There was a balance of theory and practice presented.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Information was timely and relevant.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A