Faculty/Staff Reference Form for RA Applicant

An RA is a student member of the Residence Life Department who assists students within a specific residence hall floor or community. This position involves hall management, community development, programing, mediation/intervention, student accountability, and other departmental responsibilities. The selection committee would appreciate a honest appraisal of the applicant's suitability for this position. Please have this reference form completed and submitted by Monday, February 5, 2024.

This form is best completed on a non-mobile device.

Question Title

* 1. RA Candidate's Name

First Name:

Last Name:

Question Title

* 2. Faculty/Staff Name

First Name:

Last Name:

Question Title

* 3. Faculty/Staff Contact Information

Email Address

Phone Number

Question Title

* 4. On a scale of 1-10 (1 being not very well and 10 being exceedingly well) how well do you feel you know this RA Applicant?

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 5. Select up to 8 adjectives that describe the candidate

agreeable

alert

ambitious

amusing

brave

bright

calm

capable

charming

cheerful

comfortable

confident

cooperative

credible

cultured

decisive

delightful

detailed

determined

diligent

dynamic

eager

efficient

encouraging

energetic

entertaining

enthusiastic

excited

exclusive

fair

faithful

fearless

frank

friendly

funny

generous

gentle

happy

hard worker

harmonious

helpful

hilarious

honorable

humble

impartial

instinctive

joyous

kind-hearted

knowledgeable

likeable

lively

mature

obedient

organized

peaceful

productive

proud

punctual

quiet

receptive

reflective

responsible

self-assured

sensitive

silly

sincere

skillful

steadfast

successful

succinct

talented

thoughtful

tough

trustworthy

unbiased

willing

wise

witty

Question Title

* 6. How would you rate the candidates social awareness?

	Bottom 50%	Top 50%	Top 25%	Top 10%	Top 5%	Top 1-2%	Unseen
UNDERSTANDING OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS	UNDERSTANDING OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS Bottom 50%	UNDERSTANDING OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS Top 50%	UNDERSTANDING OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS Top 25%	UNDERSTANDING OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS Top 10%	UNDERSTANDING OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS Top 5%	UNDERSTANDING OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS Top 1-2%	UNDERSTANDING OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS Unseen
ADAPTS COMMUNICATION TO EACH INDIVIDUAL	ADAPTS COMMUNICATION TO EACH INDIVIDUAL Bottom 50%	ADAPTS COMMUNICATION TO EACH INDIVIDUAL Top 50%	ADAPTS COMMUNICATION TO EACH INDIVIDUAL Top 25%	ADAPTS COMMUNICATION TO EACH INDIVIDUAL Top 10%	ADAPTS COMMUNICATION TO EACH INDIVIDUAL Top 5%	ADAPTS COMMUNICATION TO EACH INDIVIDUAL Top 1-2%	ADAPTS COMMUNICATION TO EACH INDIVIDUAL Unseen
UNDERSTANDS NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION	UNDERSTANDS NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION Bottom 50%	UNDERSTANDS NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION Top 50%	UNDERSTANDS NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION Top 25%	UNDERSTANDS NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION Top 10%	UNDERSTANDS NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION Top 5%	UNDERSTANDS NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION Top 1-2%	UNDERSTANDS NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION Unseen
TACTFULNESS IN WORKING WITH OTHERS	TACTFULNESS IN WORKING WITH OTHERS Bottom 50%	TACTFULNESS IN WORKING WITH OTHERS Top 50%	TACTFULNESS IN WORKING WITH OTHERS Top 25%	TACTFULNESS IN WORKING WITH OTHERS Top 10%	TACTFULNESS IN WORKING WITH OTHERS Top 5%	TACTFULNESS IN WORKING WITH OTHERS Top 1-2%	TACTFULNESS IN WORKING WITH OTHERS Unseen
ADAPTS LEADERSHIP BASED ON EACH SITUATION	ADAPTS LEADERSHIP BASED ON EACH SITUATION Bottom 50%	ADAPTS LEADERSHIP BASED ON EACH SITUATION Top 50%	ADAPTS LEADERSHIP BASED ON EACH SITUATION Top 25%	ADAPTS LEADERSHIP BASED ON EACH SITUATION Top 10%	ADAPTS LEADERSHIP BASED ON EACH SITUATION Top 5%	ADAPTS LEADERSHIP BASED ON EACH SITUATION Top 1-2%	ADAPTS LEADERSHIP BASED ON EACH SITUATION Unseen

Comments

Question Title

* 7. How would you rate the candidates teachability?

	Bottom 50%	Top 50%	Top 25%	Top 10%	Top 5%	Top 1-2%	Unseen
OPENNESS TO FACE NEW CHALLENGES	OPENNESS TO FACE NEW CHALLENGES Bottom 50%	OPENNESS TO FACE NEW CHALLENGES Top 50%	OPENNESS TO FACE NEW CHALLENGES Top 25%	OPENNESS TO FACE NEW CHALLENGES Top 10%	OPENNESS TO FACE NEW CHALLENGES Top 5%	OPENNESS TO FACE NEW CHALLENGES Top 1-2%	OPENNESS TO FACE NEW CHALLENGES Unseen
RESPECTFUL ATTITUDE TOWARDS AUTHORITY	RESPECTFUL ATTITUDE TOWARDS AUTHORITY Bottom 50%	RESPECTFUL ATTITUDE TOWARDS AUTHORITY Top 50%	RESPECTFUL ATTITUDE TOWARDS AUTHORITY Top 25%	RESPECTFUL ATTITUDE TOWARDS AUTHORITY Top 10%	RESPECTFUL ATTITUDE TOWARDS AUTHORITY Top 5%	RESPECTFUL ATTITUDE TOWARDS AUTHORITY Top 1-2%	RESPECTFUL ATTITUDE TOWARDS AUTHORITY Unseen
PATIENCE IN DEALING WITH THE UNKNOWN	PATIENCE IN DEALING WITH THE UNKNOWN Bottom 50%	PATIENCE IN DEALING WITH THE UNKNOWN Top 50%	PATIENCE IN DEALING WITH THE UNKNOWN Top 25%	PATIENCE IN DEALING WITH THE UNKNOWN Top 10%	PATIENCE IN DEALING WITH THE UNKNOWN Top 5%	PATIENCE IN DEALING WITH THE UNKNOWN Top 1-2%	PATIENCE IN DEALING WITH THE UNKNOWN Unseen
ASKS FOR HELP WHEN IT’S NEEDED	ASKS FOR HELP WHEN IT’S NEEDED Bottom 50%	ASKS FOR HELP WHEN IT’S NEEDED Top 50%	ASKS FOR HELP WHEN IT’S NEEDED Top 25%	ASKS FOR HELP WHEN IT’S NEEDED Top 10%	ASKS FOR HELP WHEN IT’S NEEDED Top 5%	ASKS FOR HELP WHEN IT’S NEEDED Top 1-2%	ASKS FOR HELP WHEN IT’S NEEDED Unseen
ASSIMILATES NEW INFORMATION QUICKLY	ASSIMILATES NEW INFORMATION QUICKLY Bottom 50%	ASSIMILATES NEW INFORMATION QUICKLY Top 50%	ASSIMILATES NEW INFORMATION QUICKLY Top 25%	ASSIMILATES NEW INFORMATION QUICKLY Top 10%	ASSIMILATES NEW INFORMATION QUICKLY Top 5%	ASSIMILATES NEW INFORMATION QUICKLY Top 1-2%	ASSIMILATES NEW INFORMATION QUICKLY Unseen
WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT INSTRUCTION	WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT INSTRUCTION Bottom 50%	WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT INSTRUCTION Top 50%	WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT INSTRUCTION Top 25%	WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT INSTRUCTION Top 10%	WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT INSTRUCTION Top 5%	WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT INSTRUCTION Top 1-2%	WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT INSTRUCTION Unseen

Comments

Question Title

* 8. How would you rate the candidates interdependence?

	Bottom 50%	Top 50%	Top 25%	Top 10%	Top 5%	Top 1-2%	Unseen
ACTIVELY LISTENS TO OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS	ACTIVELY LISTENS TO OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS Bottom 50%	ACTIVELY LISTENS TO OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS Top 50%	ACTIVELY LISTENS TO OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS Top 25%	ACTIVELY LISTENS TO OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS Top 10%	ACTIVELY LISTENS TO OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS Top 5%	ACTIVELY LISTENS TO OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS Top 1-2%	ACTIVELY LISTENS TO OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS Unseen
ABILITY TO COLLABORATE WITH OTHERS	ABILITY TO COLLABORATE WITH OTHERS Bottom 50%	ABILITY TO COLLABORATE WITH OTHERS Top 50%	ABILITY TO COLLABORATE WITH OTHERS Top 25%	ABILITY TO COLLABORATE WITH OTHERS Top 10%	ABILITY TO COLLABORATE WITH OTHERS Top 5%	ABILITY TO COLLABORATE WITH OTHERS Top 1-2%	ABILITY TO COLLABORATE WITH OTHERS Unseen
WILLINGNESS TO DEPEND ON OTHER PEOPLE	WILLINGNESS TO DEPEND ON OTHER PEOPLE Bottom 50%	WILLINGNESS TO DEPEND ON OTHER PEOPLE Top 50%	WILLINGNESS TO DEPEND ON OTHER PEOPLE Top 25%	WILLINGNESS TO DEPEND ON OTHER PEOPLE Top 10%	WILLINGNESS TO DEPEND ON OTHER PEOPLE Top 5%	WILLINGNESS TO DEPEND ON OTHER PEOPLE Top 1-2%	WILLINGNESS TO DEPEND ON OTHER PEOPLE Unseen
AMBITION ISN’T CONFINED TO PERSONAL GOALS	AMBITION ISN’T CONFINED TO PERSONAL GOALS Bottom 50%	AMBITION ISN’T CONFINED TO PERSONAL GOALS Top 50%	AMBITION ISN’T CONFINED TO PERSONAL GOALS Top 25%	AMBITION ISN’T CONFINED TO PERSONAL GOALS Top 10%	AMBITION ISN’T CONFINED TO PERSONAL GOALS Top 5%	AMBITION ISN’T CONFINED TO PERSONAL GOALS Top 1-2%	AMBITION ISN’T CONFINED TO PERSONAL GOALS Unseen
CONSCIENTIOUS OF OTHER PEOPLE’S OPINIONS	CONSCIENTIOUS OF OTHER PEOPLE’S OPINIONS Bottom 50%	CONSCIENTIOUS OF OTHER PEOPLE’S OPINIONS Top 50%	CONSCIENTIOUS OF OTHER PEOPLE’S OPINIONS Top 25%	CONSCIENTIOUS OF OTHER PEOPLE’S OPINIONS Top 10%	CONSCIENTIOUS OF OTHER PEOPLE’S OPINIONS Top 5%	CONSCIENTIOUS OF OTHER PEOPLE’S OPINIONS Top 1-2%	CONSCIENTIOUS OF OTHER PEOPLE’S OPINIONS Unseen

Comments

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate the candidates dependability?

	Bottom 50%	Top 50%	Top 25%	Top 10%	Top 5%	Top 1-2%	N/A
HONEST IN SMALL THINGS AND LARGE THINGS	HONEST IN SMALL THINGS AND LARGE THINGS Bottom 50%	HONEST IN SMALL THINGS AND LARGE THINGS Top 50%	HONEST IN SMALL THINGS AND LARGE THINGS Top 25%	HONEST IN SMALL THINGS AND LARGE THINGS Top 10%	HONEST IN SMALL THINGS AND LARGE THINGS Top 5%	HONEST IN SMALL THINGS AND LARGE THINGS Top 1-2%	HONEST IN SMALL THINGS AND LARGE THINGS N/A
PERSEVERANCE THROUGH OBSTACLES	PERSEVERANCE THROUGH OBSTACLES Bottom 50%	PERSEVERANCE THROUGH OBSTACLES Top 50%	PERSEVERANCE THROUGH OBSTACLES Top 25%	PERSEVERANCE THROUGH OBSTACLES Top 10%	PERSEVERANCE THROUGH OBSTACLES Top 5%	PERSEVERANCE THROUGH OBSTACLES Top 1-2%	PERSEVERANCE THROUGH OBSTACLES N/A
HAS INTEGRITY IN DIFFICULT SITUATIONS	HAS INTEGRITY IN DIFFICULT SITUATIONS Bottom 50%	HAS INTEGRITY IN DIFFICULT SITUATIONS Top 50%	HAS INTEGRITY IN DIFFICULT SITUATIONS Top 25%	HAS INTEGRITY IN DIFFICULT SITUATIONS Top 10%	HAS INTEGRITY IN DIFFICULT SITUATIONS Top 5%	HAS INTEGRITY IN DIFFICULT SITUATIONS Top 1-2%	HAS INTEGRITY IN DIFFICULT SITUATIONS N/A
DILIGENTLY COMPLETES WORK THEY ARE GIVEN	DILIGENTLY COMPLETES WORK THEY ARE GIVEN Bottom 50%	DILIGENTLY COMPLETES WORK THEY ARE GIVEN Top 50%	DILIGENTLY COMPLETES WORK THEY ARE GIVEN Top 25%	DILIGENTLY COMPLETES WORK THEY ARE GIVEN Top 10%	DILIGENTLY COMPLETES WORK THEY ARE GIVEN Top 5%	DILIGENTLY COMPLETES WORK THEY ARE GIVEN Top 1-2%	DILIGENTLY COMPLETES WORK THEY ARE GIVEN N/A
SOMEONE THAT PEOPLE TURN TO FOR HELP	SOMEONE THAT PEOPLE TURN TO FOR HELP Bottom 50%	SOMEONE THAT PEOPLE TURN TO FOR HELP Top 50%	SOMEONE THAT PEOPLE TURN TO FOR HELP Top 25%	SOMEONE THAT PEOPLE TURN TO FOR HELP Top 10%	SOMEONE THAT PEOPLE TURN TO FOR HELP Top 5%	SOMEONE THAT PEOPLE TURN TO FOR HELP Top 1-2%	SOMEONE THAT PEOPLE TURN TO FOR HELP N/A
NEEDS MINIMAL DIRECTION WHEN GIVEN TASKS	NEEDS MINIMAL DIRECTION WHEN GIVEN TASKS Bottom 50%	NEEDS MINIMAL DIRECTION WHEN GIVEN TASKS Top 50%	NEEDS MINIMAL DIRECTION WHEN GIVEN TASKS Top 25%	NEEDS MINIMAL DIRECTION WHEN GIVEN TASKS Top 10%	NEEDS MINIMAL DIRECTION WHEN GIVEN TASKS Top 5%	NEEDS MINIMAL DIRECTION WHEN GIVEN TASKS Top 1-2%	NEEDS MINIMAL DIRECTION WHEN GIVEN TASKS N/A
GOES BEYOND THE MINIMAL EXPECTATIONS	GOES BEYOND THE MINIMAL EXPECTATIONS Bottom 50%	GOES BEYOND THE MINIMAL EXPECTATIONS Top 50%	GOES BEYOND THE MINIMAL EXPECTATIONS Top 25%	GOES BEYOND THE MINIMAL EXPECTATIONS Top 10%	GOES BEYOND THE MINIMAL EXPECTATIONS Top 5%	GOES BEYOND THE MINIMAL EXPECTATIONS Top 1-2%	GOES BEYOND THE MINIMAL EXPECTATIONS N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 10. How would you rate the candidates ability to stay well balanced?

	Bottom 50%	Top 50%	Top 25%	Top 10%	Top 5%	Top 1-2%	N/A
ABILITY TO SAY “NO” TO EXTRA RESPONSIBILITY	ABILITY TO SAY “NO” TO EXTRA RESPONSIBILITY Bottom 50%	ABILITY TO SAY “NO” TO EXTRA RESPONSIBILITY Top 50%	ABILITY TO SAY “NO” TO EXTRA RESPONSIBILITY Top 25%	ABILITY TO SAY “NO” TO EXTRA RESPONSIBILITY Top 10%	ABILITY TO SAY “NO” TO EXTRA RESPONSIBILITY Top 5%	ABILITY TO SAY “NO” TO EXTRA RESPONSIBILITY Top 1-2%	ABILITY TO SAY “NO” TO EXTRA RESPONSIBILITY N/A
AWARE OF PERSONAL LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES	AWARE OF PERSONAL LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES Bottom 50%	AWARE OF PERSONAL LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES Top 50%	AWARE OF PERSONAL LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES Top 25%	AWARE OF PERSONAL LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES Top 10%	AWARE OF PERSONAL LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES Top 5%	AWARE OF PERSONAL LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES Top 1-2%	AWARE OF PERSONAL LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES N/A
ABLE TO PRIORITIZE LIST OF PROJECTS / TASKS	ABLE TO PRIORITIZE LIST OF PROJECTS / TASKS Bottom 50%	ABLE TO PRIORITIZE LIST OF PROJECTS / TASKS Top 50%	ABLE TO PRIORITIZE LIST OF PROJECTS / TASKS Top 25%	ABLE TO PRIORITIZE LIST OF PROJECTS / TASKS Top 10%	ABLE TO PRIORITIZE LIST OF PROJECTS / TASKS Top 5%	ABLE TO PRIORITIZE LIST OF PROJECTS / TASKS Top 1-2%	ABLE TO PRIORITIZE LIST OF PROJECTS / TASKS N/A
TIME MANAGEMENT SKILLS	TIME MANAGEMENT SKILLS Bottom 50%	TIME MANAGEMENT SKILLS Top 50%	TIME MANAGEMENT SKILLS Top 25%	TIME MANAGEMENT SKILLS Top 10%	TIME MANAGEMENT SKILLS Top 5%	TIME MANAGEMENT SKILLS Top 1-2%	TIME MANAGEMENT SKILLS N/A
DOES NOT LOSE INDIVIDUALITY IN A CROWD	DOES NOT LOSE INDIVIDUALITY IN A CROWD Bottom 50%	DOES NOT LOSE INDIVIDUALITY IN A CROWD Top 50%	DOES NOT LOSE INDIVIDUALITY IN A CROWD Top 25%	DOES NOT LOSE INDIVIDUALITY IN A CROWD Top 10%	DOES NOT LOSE INDIVIDUALITY IN A CROWD Top 5%	DOES NOT LOSE INDIVIDUALITY IN A CROWD Top 1-2%	DOES NOT LOSE INDIVIDUALITY IN A CROWD N/A
COMMITMENT TO RESTING AND RELAXING	COMMITMENT TO RESTING AND RELAXING Bottom 50%	COMMITMENT TO RESTING AND RELAXING Top 50%	COMMITMENT TO RESTING AND RELAXING Top 25%	COMMITMENT TO RESTING AND RELAXING Top 10%	COMMITMENT TO RESTING AND RELAXING Top 5%	COMMITMENT TO RESTING AND RELAXING Top 1-2%	COMMITMENT TO RESTING AND RELAXING N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 11. Overall Evaluation of the RA Candidate

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Comments

Question Title

* 12. Please sign below showing that the information you have inputted above is an accurate reflection of the individual you are evaluating.

Electronic Signature:

Geneva ID #:

Title:

Date:

Thank you so much for filling out this evaluation! Your insights are a valuable aspect of our decision process.