Skip to content
Flash Détente Seminar Survey
Presenter Information & Speaker Evaluation
33%
1.
Please evaluate each speaker.
(speakers listed alphabetically)
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Linda Bisson
, University of California, Davis (Moderator)
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Véronique Cheynier
, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, France
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Corneliu Dane
, Monterey Wine Company, California
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Doug Fletcher
, Terlato Wine Group, California
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Barry Gnekow
, Barry Gnekow & Associates, California
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Richard Jones
, Consulting Winemaker, California
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Eric Laumann
, Monterey Wine Company, California
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Seung Kook Park
, Kyung Hee University, South Korea
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Jean-Michel Salmon
, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, France
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
2.
Comments On Specific Speaker(s):
Please include speaker name(s).
3.
Please rate the following information.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters were well prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters’ style was clear and effective.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters stimulated interest and discussion.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters were responsive to participants.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Visual aids were useful and appropriate.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
The content was consistent with the description.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Objectives were clearly stated.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
There was a balance of theory and practice presented.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Information was timely and relevant.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A