Wednesday September 16, 1200-1300 (UTC)

Introduction and Dosing the Obese Elderly Patient
Dario Cattaneo, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco University Hospital, Italy

Learning Objectives: At the end of this session participants will be able to:
- Discuss how obesity represents an important source of drugs PK variability.
- Consider the patient’s body composition when calculating doses.
- Explain the advantages and disadvantages of body size metrics of obese patients.
- Consider aging as an additional contributor of drug variability in obese patients.

Anti-Infective Dosing in the Obese Child
Catherijne A.J. Knibbe, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Leiden University, Netherlands

Learning Objectives: At the end of this session participants will be able to:
- Define pediatric overweight and obesity.
- Explain the differences in influence of obesity on pharmacokinetics between drugs.
- Discuss the differences in obesity-related influence on pharmacokinetics between obese adults and obese children.
- Reflect on the use of total bodyweight or other weight measures for dosing in obese children.

Dosing the Patient with Obesity; Changes with Weight Reduction
Anders Åsberg, Oslo University Hospital–Rikshospitalet, Norway

Learning Objectives: At the end of this session participants will be able to:
- Explain differences in CYP activities over a wide range of bodyweights.
- Discuss the effect of weight reduction on CYP activities.

The Obese Patient in the Intensive Care Unit
Debbie Marriott, St Vincent’s Hospital, Australia

Learning Objectives: At the end of this session participants will be able to:
- Describe the pathophysiological changes associated with critical illness.
- Determine the impact of obesity on these changes.
- Discuss the literature concerning antimicrobial dosing in the obese critically ill patient.
- Explain the role of antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring in this clinical setting.

Question Title

* 1. This session overall

  Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning
The session was free from commercial bias

Question Title

* 2. Overall, I would rate this symposium as:

Question Title

* 3. Speaker: Dario Cattaneo

  Fair Good Very Good Outstanding
Knowledgeable, organized and effective
Educational content/Relevance to practice
Balanced and unbiased

Question Title

* 4. Speaker: Catherijne A.J. Knibbe

  Fair Good Very Good Outstanding
Knowledgeable, organized and effective
Educational content/Relevance to practice
Balanced and unbiased

Question Title

* 5. Speaker: Anders Åsberg

  Fair Good Very Good Outstanding
Knowledgeable, organized and effective
Educational content/Relevance to practice
Balanced and unbiased

Question Title

* 6. Speaker: Deborah Marriott

  Fair Good Very Good Outstanding
Knowledgeable, organized and effective
Educational content/Relevance to practice
Balanced and unbiased

Question Title

* 7. As a result of attending this session, I am planning to:

Question Title

* 8. Please explain any changes you plan to make or personal learning projects you will pursue as a result of this session:

Question Title

* 9. What topics would you like to be addressed at future conferences to keep you up to date in your profession?

T