Skip to content
Microbiology Session Survey
Presenter Information & Speaker Evaluation
33%
1.
Please evaluate each speaker.
(speakers listed alphabetically)
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Torey Arvik
, Cork Supply USA, California (Moderator)
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Marion Favier
, INRA-UBS-IPB Institut des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin, France
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Pascal Herr
, State Education and Research Center for Viticulture & Horticulture (DLR – Rheinpfalz), Germany
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
C.M. Lucy Joseph
, University of California, Davis
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Michael S. Ramsey
, University of California, Davis
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Stephan Sommer
, State Education and Research Center for Viticulture & Horticulture (DLR – Rheinpfalz), Germany
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Christian von Wallbrunn
, State Research Institute Geisenheim, Germany
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
2.
Comments On Specific Speaker(s):
Please include speaker name(s).
3.
Please rate the following information.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters were well prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters’ style was clear and effective.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters stimulated interest and discussion.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Presenters were responsive to participants.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Visual aids were useful and appropriate.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Objectives were clearly stated.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
There was a balance of theory and practice presented.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Information was timely and relevant.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A