GWO Merit - March 2024

GWO Merit Positioning Paper Survey

GWO stakeholders are invited to contribute their opinions on the Merit Positioning Paper. We would welcome your specific thoughts on the following questions.
1.Name(Required.)
2.Email(Required.)
3.I am a…(Required.)
4.On a scale of one to five how much do you agree with the following statements:

There is unmet demand for meriting.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
5.It is reasonable to have constraints on the range of legacy qualifications acceptable to meriting.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
6.It is reasonable to have constraints on the elapsed time since qualification is acceptable to meriting.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
7.Training providers are well placed to undertake individual merit gap assessments?
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
8.Certified GWO instructors are competent to undertake merit gap analysis without further training.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
9.In your experience what changes to instructor qualification or continuing professional development may be needed to keep instructors updated on changes to incoming legacy qualifications?
10.Would a certification approach to controlling merit assessment offer sufficient flexibility and assurance of quality - and why (not)?
11.What other meriting processes you have you experienced and would recommend - and why?
12.I would welcome the opportunity to discuss my answers in more depth and give GWO permission to send and received further communications on this.(Required.)
100%