Skip to content
2013 SAEM AM Didactic - DS055
1.
Inauguration of the NIH Office of Emergency Care Research
1.
Goals/Objectives of session were clear and accomplished.
Yes
No
2.
Speakers were knowledgeable with teaching skills that were appropriate for the subject.
Yes
No
3.
Probability of changing practice due to these presentations?
High
Low
No Change Necessary
------------>
High
Low
No Change Necessary
What would you change or consider changing?
4.
Charles Cairns, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
5.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
6.
Comments for Charles Cairns, MD
7.
Roger Lewis, MD, PhD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
8.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
9.
Comments for Roger Lewis, MD, PhD
10.
Walter Korshetz, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
11.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
12.
Comments for Walter Korshetz, MD
13.
Scott Somers, PhD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
14.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
15.
Comments for Scott Somers, PhD
16.
Scott Somers, PhD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
17.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
18.
Comments for Scott Somers, PhD
19.
Alice Mascette, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
20.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
21.
Comments for Alice Mascette, MD