Skip to content
Barriers Faced by Athletics Members in Regional NSW
Hypotheses for Testing
1.
Distance to meaningful competition—not just access to a track—is a primary driver of athlete drop-out in regional areas.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
2.
The scarcity of permit meets and specialist event coaching and event opportunities (e.g. Pole Vault) limits regional athletes’ ability to gain rankings and qualify for higher-level events.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
3.
Weekly athletics opportunities within 30 minutes of home help protect participation; beyond this, families are more likely to treat athletics as an occasional rather than core sport.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
4.
The current competition and pathway structure imposes disproportionately high travel and accommodation costs on regional athletes, families, coaches, and officials—making higher-level participation more burdensome than for metropolitan counterparts.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
5.
Pathway timing often clashes with farming calendars, local school rhythms, and regional climate realities—creating unique friction not experienced in metropolitan areas.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
6.
In regional settings, the lack of accessible, sustained coaching within 45–60 minutes of home limits long-term athlete development more than the absence of a synthetic track—and this is compounded by difficulty retaining qualified coaches.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
7.
The shortage and burnout of officials in regional NSW directly limits the ability to deliver sanctioned or higher-level meets locally.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
8.
Volunteer and committee overload in regional centres—combined with high turnover and limited succession planning—undermines the quality, consistency, and continuity of pathway messaging to families.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
9.
Perceived competence and confidence are more fragile for regional athletes due to fewer high-quality competition touchpoints.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
10.
Girls in regional areas are particularly likely to drop out by mid-teens due to limited access to female role models and fewer local peers remaining in the sport.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
11.
Regional para athletes face barriers to competition due to limited access to classification, specialist coaches, events, and appropriate facilities.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
12.
Regional clubs and volunteer organisations often lack the internal governance experience and external council support needed to successfully access and apply for new funding and influence facility developments.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
13.
Regional athletics clubs compete for limited local facilities with other sports at a higher rate than metropolitan clubs.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree