ICANN82 | ccNSO Members Meeting satisfaction survey

Question Title

* 1. On a scale from 1 to 5, how satisfied are you with the recent ccNSO Members Meeting? (5 being very satisfied)

0 (not satisfied)

5 (very satisfied)

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 2. Overall, the ccNSO Members Meeting agenda covered topics that were relevant to the interests and needs of my ccTLD.

Agree

Undecided

Disagree

Please explain, and be as specific as possible.

Question Title

* 3. Overall, the sessions were well organised, informative and engaging.

Agree

Undecided

Disagree

Please explain, and be as specific as possible.

Question Title

* 4. How would you rate the quality of the ccNSO Members Meeting sessions?

	very good	good	acceptable	poor	very poor	I did not attend
- Welcome Session	- Welcome Session very good	- Welcome Session good	- Welcome Session acceptable	- Welcome Session poor	- Welcome Session very poor	- Welcome Session I did not attend
- ccTLD News Session	- ccTLD News Session very good	- ccTLD News Session good	- ccTLD News Session acceptable	- ccTLD News Session poor	- ccTLD News Session very poor	- ccTLD News Session I did not attend
- Registrant verification and data accuracy	- Registrant verification and data accuracy very good	- Registrant verification and data accuracy good	- Registrant verification and data accuracy acceptable	- Registrant verification and data accuracy poor	- Registrant verification and data accuracy very poor	- Registrant verification and data accuracy I did not attend
- ccTLD financial contributions	- ccTLD financial contributions very good	- ccTLD financial contributions good	- ccTLD financial contributions acceptable	- ccTLD financial contributions poor	- ccTLD financial contributions very poor	- ccTLD financial contributions I did not attend
- Policy gap analysis session	- Policy gap analysis session very good	- Policy gap analysis session good	- Policy gap analysis session acceptable	- Policy gap analysis session poor	- Policy gap analysis session very poor	- Policy gap analysis session I did not attend
- ccTLD News Part 2	- ccTLD News Part 2 very good	- ccTLD News Part 2 good	- ccTLD News Part 2 acceptable	- ccTLD News Part 2 poor	- ccTLD News Part 2 very poor	- ccTLD News Part 2 I did not attend
- Joint meeting: ccNSO and GAC	- Joint meeting: ccNSO and GAC very good	- Joint meeting: ccNSO and GAC good	- Joint meeting: ccNSO and GAC acceptable	- Joint meeting: ccNSO and GAC poor	- Joint meeting: ccNSO and GAC very poor	- Joint meeting: ccNSO and GAC I did not attend
- Meeting with ccTLD-related icann board members	- Meeting with ccTLD-related icann board members very good	- Meeting with ccTLD-related icann board members good	- Meeting with ccTLD-related icann board members acceptable	- Meeting with ccTLD-related icann board members poor	- Meeting with ccTLD-related icann board members very poor	- Meeting with ccTLD-related icann board members I did not attend
- Working group and committee updates	- Working group and committee updates very good	- Working group and committee updates good	- Working group and committee updates acceptable	- Working group and committee updates poor	- Working group and committee updates very poor	- Working group and committee updates I did not attend
- Session on drivers for UA readiness	- Session on drivers for UA readiness very good	- Session on drivers for UA readiness good	- Session on drivers for UA readiness acceptable	- Session on drivers for UA readiness poor	- Session on drivers for UA readiness very poor	- Session on drivers for UA readiness I did not attend
- OMC welcoming newcomers	- OMC welcoming newcomers very good	- OMC welcoming newcomers good	- OMC welcoming newcomers acceptable	- OMC welcoming newcomers poor	- OMC welcoming newcomers very poor	- OMC welcoming newcomers I did not attend

Please explain, and be as specific as possible.

Question Title

* 5. I was able to connect with peers, colleagues, or other stakeholders during the meeting.

Much

Somewhat

Little

Please explain, and be as specific as possible

Question Title

* 6. Did you feel encouraged to actively participate in discussions and sessions during the ccNSO Members Meeting?

Yes

Somewhat

Please explain why?

ICANN82 | ccNSO Members Meeting satisfaction survey

Question Title

* 1. On a scale from 1 to 5, how satisfied are you with the recent ccNSO Members Meeting? (5 being very satisfied)

Question Title

* 2. Overall, the ccNSO Members Meeting agenda covered topics that were relevant to the interests and needs of my ccTLD.

Question Title

* 3. Overall, the sessions were well organised, informative and engaging.

Question Title

* 4. How would you rate the quality of the ccNSO Members Meeting sessions?

Question Title

* 5. I was able to connect with peers, colleagues, or other stakeholders during the meeting.

Question Title

* 6. Did you feel encouraged to actively participate in discussions and sessions during the ccNSO Members Meeting?

Question Title

* 7. What improvements, if any, would you suggest for the overall ccNSO Members Meeting experience? Please be as specific as possible.

Question Title

* 8. Which topic or session should be on the agenda at the next ccNSO Members meeting?

Question Title

* 9. Is there anything else you would like to share about your experience at the ccNSO Members Meeting?