A. Webb Roberts Center for Continuing Medical Education Internal Medicine Review Day 3 Evaluation Wednesday 7/17/2019 Question Title * 1. Title MD DO Resident DPM PA Nurse Practitioner Other Other (please specify) Question Title * 2. To help us evaluate the successfulness of our educational activity, please list changes you intend to make in your current role as a result of attending this activity:(i.e., Change/improve strategies for treatment of pulmonary patients based on evidence presented) 1 2 Question Title * 3. Was the content free of bias? Yes No If you selected No, please indicate bias perceived during this presentation. Question Title * 4. Faculty Evaluation:Update in Hepatology- Dawn Sears, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5)Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5)Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5)Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5)Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5)Excellent Comment: Question Title * 5. Faculty Evaluation:Trends in Cost Conscience Care - Tresa McNeal, MD, FACP (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5)Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5)Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5)Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5)Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5)Excellent Comment: Question Title * 6. Faculty Evaluation:E-Cigarettes and Vaping: What do we know? - Carl Boethel, MD, FCCP, FASM, D'ABSM (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5)Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5)Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5)Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5)Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5)Excellent Comment: Question Title * 7. Faculty Evaluation:Marijuana: What an Internist Needs to Know? - Sully Drotar, DO (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5)Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5)Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5)Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5)Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5)Excellent Comment: Question Title * 8. Faculty Evaluation:Trends in Hospital Medicine- Tresa McNeal, MD, FACP (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5)Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5)Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5)Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5)Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5)Excellent (*Ethics)Comment: Question Title * 9. Faculty Evaluation:Managing Pulmonary Nodules - Carl Boethel, MD, FCCP, FASM, D'ABSM (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5)Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5)Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5)Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5)Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5)Excellent Comment: Question Title * 10. Faculty Evaluation:Trending Topics in Women's Health - Sully Drotar, DO (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5)Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5)Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5)Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5)Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5)Excellent Comment: Question Title * 11. Faculty Evaluation:Fake News and Medical Myths - Mike McNeal, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5)Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5)Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5)Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5)Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5)Excellent Comment: Question Title * 12. Faculty Evaluation:Pelvic Floor Rehab -- Melinda Gregory, PT, DPT (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5)Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5)Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5)Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5)Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5)Excellent Comment: Done
