Question Title

* 1. Please Evaluate: Change Request (CR) Process

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
CR solicitation process was easy to understand
CR submission form/format acceptable
CR submission deadline/timeframe adequate
Posting of CRs on website helpful
Member comment form/format acceptable
Member comment period on CRs adequate
Technical Review Committee (TRC) conference calls were helpful
Posting of TRC reviews of CRs helpful
Member comment period on TRC reviews adequate
Online CR/comment submission system worked well
Pre-conference online CR/TRC/comment review systems were helpful
Communication about the MAHC change process (such as submission deadlines, the CR process, and CMAHC business) was timely and relevant

Question Title

* 2. Please Evaluate: Conference

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
Communication about conference information was timely and relevant
Registration process easy to understand and use
Registration packet/files had what I needed
Opening presentation and state of the CMAHC presentation was useful
Live Stream effective
Chat room effective
Projecting chat room on screen useful
Business meeting and presentation useful
Presentation of only selected CRs at conference was acceptable
CR listing handouts was useful (those presented and those NOT presented)
Adequate time for review/discussion of CRs
Felt my views were heard
Conference met my expectations
Conference was interactive and engaging
Conference was a good use of my time
I will recommend CMAHC membership and attendance to my colleagues

Question Title

* 3. Please Evaluate: Caucus Time

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree no Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
Sessions helped my decision making
Sessions were well-organized and efficient
Adequate time provided for each session

Question Title

* 4. Please Evaluate: CMAHC Voting Process

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
Opening voting with conference should continue
On-line vote module-structure, layout, content adequate
Board of Director's vote was understandable

Question Title

* 5. Additional Comments & Questions: Please take the time to write in your comments on how to improve the process. Many of the improvements suggested at the 2015 conference came from these evaluation forms.

The CMAHC is Driven by Your Expertise and also by your feedback

Question Title

* 6. OPTIONAL: Provide your name and email if you give us permission to contact you with further questions that would help us improve CMAHC services.

T