WORKSHOP: "Death by a Thousand Cuts”: Managing Moral Injury in Twenty-First Century Psychiatry | Dr. Jennifer Gale Hibbard & Dr. Monique Jericho

2025 APA Scientific Conference

50% of survey complete.

Please click "Next" if you did not attend this session

Question Title

* The session met the stated learning objectives:

	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Somewhat disagree	Neither agree or disagree	Somewhat agree	Agree	Strongly agree
Explore defining criteria of Moral injury and its’ impact on emotional well being of Health professionals;	Explore defining criteria of Moral injury and its’ impact on emotional well being of Health professionals; Strongly disagree	Explore defining criteria of Moral injury and its’ impact on emotional well being of Health professionals; Disagree	Explore defining criteria of Moral injury and its’ impact on emotional well being of Health professionals; Somewhat disagree	Explore defining criteria of Moral injury and its’ impact on emotional well being of Health professionals; Neither agree or disagree	Explore defining criteria of Moral injury and its’ impact on emotional well being of Health professionals; Somewhat agree	Explore defining criteria of Moral injury and its’ impact on emotional well being of Health professionals; Agree	Explore defining criteria of Moral injury and its’ impact on emotional well being of Health professionals; Strongly agree
Describe the range of potentially morally injurious events specifically associated with being a psychiatrist; and	Describe the range of potentially morally injurious events specifically associated with being a psychiatrist; and Strongly disagree	Describe the range of potentially morally injurious events specifically associated with being a psychiatrist; and Disagree	Describe the range of potentially morally injurious events specifically associated with being a psychiatrist; and Somewhat disagree	Describe the range of potentially morally injurious events specifically associated with being a psychiatrist; and Neither agree or disagree	Describe the range of potentially morally injurious events specifically associated with being a psychiatrist; and Somewhat agree	Describe the range of potentially morally injurious events specifically associated with being a psychiatrist; and Agree	Describe the range of potentially morally injurious events specifically associated with being a psychiatrist; and Strongly agree
Reference best evidence for identifying, healing and preventing moral injury.	Reference best evidence for identifying, healing and preventing moral injury. Strongly disagree	Reference best evidence for identifying, healing and preventing moral injury. Disagree	Reference best evidence for identifying, healing and preventing moral injury. Somewhat disagree	Reference best evidence for identifying, healing and preventing moral injury. Neither agree or disagree	Reference best evidence for identifying, healing and preventing moral injury. Somewhat agree	Reference best evidence for identifying, healing and preventing moral injury. Agree	Reference best evidence for identifying, healing and preventing moral injury. Strongly agree

Question Title

* Please rate the following on a scale of 1 to 5
(1 - strongly disagree and 5 - strongly agree):

	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Somewhat disagree	Neither agree or disagree	Somewhat agree	Agree	Strongly agree
The session was educationally relevant.	The session was educationally relevant. Strongly disagree	The session was educationally relevant. Disagree	The session was educationally relevant. Somewhat disagree	The session was educationally relevant. Neither agree or disagree	The session was educationally relevant. Somewhat agree	The session was educationally relevant. Agree	The session was educationally relevant. Strongly agree
The presenter was educationally effective.	The presenter was educationally effective. Strongly disagree	The presenter was educationally effective. Disagree	The presenter was educationally effective. Somewhat disagree	The presenter was educationally effective. Neither agree or disagree	The presenter was educationally effective. Somewhat agree	The presenter was educationally effective. Agree	The presenter was educationally effective. Strongly agree
The session provided interactive opportunities.	The session provided interactive opportunities. Strongly disagree	The session provided interactive opportunities. Disagree	The session provided interactive opportunities. Somewhat disagree	The session provided interactive opportunities. Neither agree or disagree	The session provided interactive opportunities. Somewhat agree	The session provided interactive opportunities. Agree	The session provided interactive opportunities. Strongly agree
The session provided opportunities to identify and/or reflect on what was learned and its potential impact on my practice	The session provided opportunities to identify and/or reflect on what was learned and its potential impact on my practice Strongly disagree	The session provided opportunities to identify and/or reflect on what was learned and its potential impact on my practice Disagree	The session provided opportunities to identify and/or reflect on what was learned and its potential impact on my practice Somewhat disagree	The session provided opportunities to identify and/or reflect on what was learned and its potential impact on my practice Neither agree or disagree	The session provided opportunities to identify and/or reflect on what was learned and its potential impact on my practice Somewhat agree	The session provided opportunities to identify and/or reflect on what was learned and its potential impact on my practice Agree	The session provided opportunities to identify and/or reflect on what was learned and its potential impact on my practice Strongly agree

Comments:

Question Title

* Please rate the following on a scale of 1 to 5
(1 - strongly disagree and 5 - strongly agree):

	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Somewhat disagree	Neither agree or disagree	Somewhat agree	Agree	Strongly agree
The session and presenter did NOT have commercial or other inappropriate bias.	The session and presenter did NOT have commercial or other inappropriate bias. Strongly disagree	The session and presenter did NOT have commercial or other inappropriate bias. Disagree	The session and presenter did NOT have commercial or other inappropriate bias. Somewhat disagree	The session and presenter did NOT have commercial or other inappropriate bias. Neither agree or disagree	The session and presenter did NOT have commercial or other inappropriate bias. Somewhat agree	The session and presenter did NOT have commercial or other inappropriate bias. Agree	The session and presenter did NOT have commercial or other inappropriate bias. Strongly agree

Comments:

Question Title

* Please provide any other comments you would like to share: