Exit this survey >>

Default Section

Question Title

* 1. Participant Information. Pharmacists and pharmacy techs: CE will be posted to your NABP CPE account within two weeks following completion of the evaluation.

Question Title

* 2. Professional Designation

Question Title

* 3. For pharmacists and pharmacy technicians. What is your NABP CPE number?

Question Title

* 4. What s your birthdate (month/date only no year)?

  Month Date born
Birthdate

Question Title

* 5. Program:

  Strongly Agree=5 Agree=4 Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Overall, I was satisfied with this course.
My educational needs were met.
The activity will be useful in my practice or service.
Active learning opportunities were incorporated.
Effective delivery techniques were utilized.
I did not perceive any bias or commercialism.

Question Title

* 6. Learning Assessment:

  Strongly Agree=5 Agree=4 Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
The learning assessment questions were reasonable and adequate based on the presentation.

Question Title

* 7. Content-Learning Objectives

  Strongly Agree=5 Agree=4 Neutral=3 Disagree=2 Strongly Disagree=1
State the purpose of USP Chapter <800> Hazardous Drugs – Handling in Healthcare Settings
Cite work practices which must be considered for safe handling
Identify changes that may be needed in order to be compliant

Question Title

* 8. Analyze the outcomes of the meeting.

  Strongly Agree=5 Agree=4 Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
The information presented reinforced my current practice.
The information presented provided new ideas or information I expect to use.
The information presented enhanced my current knowledge base.
The information presented will improve my practice/patient outcomes.
The information presented will cause me to make a change to my practice.
I am committed to making these changes.

Question Title

* 9. Speaker

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
The author demonstrated adequate knowledge of the subject matter.
The author explained the content clearly and accurately.
The author was responsive to questions.
The material was presented in a fair and impartial manner.

Question Title

* 10. What were the strengths of the program?

Question Title

* 11. What would you improve with the program? Please address any disagree or strongly disagree responses from above.

Question Title

* 12. What type of guides or courses would you like to see presented in the future?

Question Title

* 13. Other comments:

T