Session Evaluation - E-Poster/Meet the presenters | CanSAGE 2023

E-Poster session/Meet the presenters

Speakers: Andrew Zakhari, Samuel Cheng, Brigitte Corran, Teresa Flaxman, Katherine Gray, Fleur Serge Kanti, Anna Kobylianskii, Meghan McGrattan, Hannah Melchiorre, Vanessa Rojas-Luengas, Neha Sarna, Jayesh Tigdi, Aleksandra Uzelac, Kate Wahl, Grace Zhou.

Question Title

* 1. Your name and email (this information will not be shared with anyone)

Last Name

First Name

Question Title

* 2. Please rate the quality of the session on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

	1 - Strongly disagree	2 - Disagree	3 - Neutral	4 - Agree	5 - Strongly agree
Met the stated learning objectives	Met the stated learning objectives 1 - Strongly disagree	Met the stated learning objectives 2 - Disagree	Met the stated learning objectives 3 - Neutral	Met the stated learning objectives 4 - Agree	Met the stated learning objectives 5 - Strongly agree
Enhanced my knowledge	Enhanced my knowledge 1 - Strongly disagree	Enhanced my knowledge 2 - Disagree	Enhanced my knowledge 3 - Neutral	Enhanced my knowledge 4 - Agree	Enhanced my knowledge 5 - Strongly agree
Satisfied my expectations	Satisfied my expectations 1 - Strongly disagree	Satisfied my expectations 2 - Disagree	Satisfied my expectations 3 - Neutral	Satisfied my expectations 4 - Agree	Satisfied my expectations 5 - Strongly agree
Conveyed information that applied to my pratice	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 1 - Strongly disagree	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 2 - Disagree	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 3 - Neutral	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 4 - Agree	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 5 - Strongly agree
Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 1 - Strongly disagree	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 2 - Disagree	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 3 - Neutral	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 4 - Agree	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 5 - Strongly agree
Was free from commercial bias	Was free from commercial bias 1 - Strongly disagree	Was free from commercial bias 2 - Disagree	Was free from commercial bias 3 - Neutral	Was free from commercial bias 4 - Agree	Was free from commercial bias 5 - Strongly agree

Question Title

* 3. If you perceived any sources of commercial bias, please describe:

Question Title

* 4. What did you learn or how will this educational session impact your practice?

Question Title

* 5. Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity?

Medical expert

Communicator

Professional

Scholar

Health advocate

Collaborator

Leader

Question Title

* 6. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Andrew Zakhari:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 7. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Samuel Cheng:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 8. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Brigitte Corran:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Teresa Flaxman:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Katherine Gray:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Fleur Serge Kanti:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Anna Kobylianskii:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Meghan McGrattan:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Hannah Melchiorre:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Vanessa Rojas-Luengas:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Neha Sarna:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Jayesh Tigdi:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Aleksandra Uzelac:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 19. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Kate Wahl:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 20. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Grace Zhou:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

Question Title

* 21. Please rate the overall session:

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Overall	Overall 1 - Bad	Overall 2 - Not bad	Overall 3 - Good	Overall 4 - Very good	Overall 5 - Extremely good

Session Evaluation - E-Poster/Meet the presenters | CanSAGE 2023

Question Title

* 1. Your name and email (this information will not be shared with anyone)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate the quality of the session on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

Question Title

* 3. If you perceived any sources of commercial bias, please describe:

Question Title

* 4. What did you learn or how will this educational session impact your practice?

Question Title

* 5. Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity?

Question Title

* 6. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Andrew Zakhari:

Question Title

* 7. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Samuel Cheng:

Question Title

* 8. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Brigitte Corran:

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Teresa Flaxman:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Katherine Gray:

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Fleur Serge Kanti:

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Anna Kobylianskii:

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Meghan McGrattan:

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Hannah Melchiorre:

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Vanessa Rojas-Luengas:

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Neha Sarna:

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Jayesh Tigdi:

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Aleksandra Uzelac:

Question Title

* 19. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Kate Wahl:

Question Title

* 20. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Grace Zhou:

Question Title

* 21. Please rate the overall session:

Question Title

* 22. Any additional comments?