IDEA StatiCa Section BETA – user feedback

Thank you for participating in the IDEA StatiCa Section BETA program. Your feedback is crucial for us to improve the application. Please take a few minutes to complete this survey.

Question Title

1. Which of the following best describes your role? (Required.)

Reinforced concrete designer

Concrete bridge engineer

Specialist in concrete assessment or strengthening

Specialist in both steel and concrete

Question Title

2. On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied are you with the IDEA StatiCa Section BETA application? (Required.)

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

3. On a scale of 0-10, how well does the application support your reinforced concrete section check use cases and workflows, especially with respect to EN 1992‑1‑1:2023? (Required.)

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

4. How did you typically perform reinforced concrete cross‑section checks before using IDEA StatiCa Section BETA? (Required.)

Using IDEA StatiCa RCS

Using Excel spreadsheets or in‑house calculation tools

Using other commercial software

Manual checks based directly on Eurocode formulas

Question Title

5. In which scenarios has IDEA StatiCa Section BETA met, exceeded, or failed to meet your expectations? (Required.)

Question Title

6. On a scale of 0–10, how do you evaluate the transparency of calculations in the Section app (clear formulas, substituted values, check and report outputs)? (Required.)

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

7. What improvements or missing features would you suggest for future versions of the Section app? (Required.)

Question Title

8. On a scale of 0–5, how easy has it been to learn and start using IDEA StatiCa Section BETA, considering it introduces new workflows for RC section design? (Required.)

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

9. On a scale of 0-5, how helpful have the provided resources and/or support been? (Required.)

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

10. What do you like most about IDEA StatiCa Section BETA? (Required.)

Question Title

11. On a scale of 0-5, how likely would you be to recommend Section BETA to a colleague or peer? (Required.)

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

IDEA StatiCa Section BETA – user feedback

Question Title

* 1. Which of the following best describes your role? (Required.)

Question Title

* 2. On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied are you with the IDEA StatiCa Section BETA application? (Required.)

Question Title

* 3. On a scale of 0-10, how well does the application support your reinforced concrete section check use cases and workflows, especially with respect to EN 1992‑1‑1:2023? (Required.)

Question Title

* 4. How did you typically perform reinforced concrete cross‑section checks before using IDEA StatiCa Section BETA? (Required.)

Question Title

* 5. In which scenarios has IDEA StatiCa Section BETA met, exceeded, or failed to meet your expectations? (Required.)

Question Title

* 6. On a scale of 0–10, how do you evaluate the transparency of calculations in the Section app (clear formulas, substituted values, check and report outputs)? (Required.)

Question Title

* 7. What improvements or missing features would you suggest for future versions of the Section app? (Required.)

Question Title

* 8. On a scale of 0–5, how easy has it been to learn and start using IDEA StatiCa Section BETA, considering it introduces new workflows for RC section design? (Required.)

Question Title

* 9. On a scale of 0-5, how helpful have the provided resources and/or support been? (Required.)

Question Title

* 10. What do you like most about IDEA StatiCa Section BETA? (Required.)

Question Title

* 11. On a scale of 0-5, how likely would you be to recommend Section BETA to a colleague or peer? (Required.)

Question Title

* 12. Please share any other comments or suggestions.

1. Which of the following best describes your role? (Required.)

2. On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied are you with the IDEA StatiCa Section BETA application? (Required.)

3. On a scale of 0-10, how well does the application support your reinforced concrete section check use cases and workflows, especially with respect to EN 1992‑1‑1:2023? (Required.)

4. How did you typically perform reinforced concrete cross‑section checks before using IDEA StatiCa Section BETA? (Required.)

5. In which scenarios has IDEA StatiCa Section BETA met, exceeded, or failed to meet your expectations? (Required.)

6. On a scale of 0–10, how do you evaluate the transparency of calculations in the Section app (clear formulas, substituted values, check and report outputs)? (Required.)

7. What improvements or missing features would you suggest for future versions of the Section app? (Required.)

8. On a scale of 0–5, how easy has it been to learn and start using IDEA StatiCa Section BETA, considering it introduces new workflows for RC section design? (Required.)

9. On a scale of 0-5, how helpful have the provided resources and/or support been? (Required.)

10. What do you like most about IDEA StatiCa Section BETA? (Required.)

11. On a scale of 0-5, how likely would you be to recommend Section BETA to a colleague or peer? (Required.)

12. Please share any other comments or suggestions.