VIS 2016 - Tutorials and Workshops Feedback

Your opinion is important to us! Your feedback helps tutorials and workshops organizers improve their sessions.

* 1. Select the workshop/tutorial for evaluation
(Please re-take this survey to give feedback for multiple workshops / tutorials):

Tutorial: Applying Color Theory to VIS

Tutorial: Considering Qualitative Evaluation

Tutorial: Human Vision, Cognition and Visualization

Tutorial: Information Theory in Visualization

Tutorial: Recent Advancements of Feature-based Flow Visualization and Analysis

Tutorial: Sketching Designs for Data-Visualization using the Five Design-Sheet Methodology

Tutorial: Tensor Decomposition Methods in Visual Computing

Tutorial: User-Centred Evaluation in Visualization

Tutorial: Visual Analytics for High-Dimensional Data

Tutorial: Visualization Analysis and Design

Workshop: 2nd Workshop on Eye Tracking and Visualization (ETVIS)

Workshop: Creation, Curation, Critique and Conditioning of Principles and Guidelines in Visualization (C4PGV)

Workshop: Discovery Jam: An IEEE VIS 2016 Workshop Proposal

Workshop: Innovations in the Pedagogy of Data Visualization

Workshop: LIVVIL: Logging Interactive Visualizations & Visualizing Interaction Logs

Workshop: Open Source Tools for Visualization

Workshop: The Event Event: Workshop on Temporal & Sequential Event Analysis

Workshop: Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities

* 2. Please select the number that closest reflects your opinion about the following:

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neither agree nor disagree	Disagree	Strongly disagree
1) Was the topic presented well?	1) Was the topic presented well? Strongly Agree	1) Was the topic presented well? Agree	1) Was the topic presented well? Neither agree nor disagree	1) Was the topic presented well? Disagree	1) Was the topic presented well? Strongly disagree
2) Was the material presented well?	2) Was the material presented well? Strongly Agree	2) Was the material presented well? Agree	2) Was the material presented well? Neither agree nor disagree	2) Was the material presented well? Disagree	2) Was the material presented well? Strongly disagree
3) Were the sessions within the tutorial/workshop well coordinated with each other?	3) Were the sessions within the tutorial/workshop well coordinated with each other? Strongly Agree	3) Were the sessions within the tutorial/workshop well coordinated with each other? Agree	3) Were the sessions within the tutorial/workshop well coordinated with each other? Neither agree nor disagree	3) Were the sessions within the tutorial/workshop well coordinated with each other? Disagree	3) Were the sessions within the tutorial/workshop well coordinated with each other? Strongly disagree
4) Was it coherent in its content, with no significant holes?	4) Was it coherent in its content, with no significant holes? Strongly Agree	4) Was it coherent in its content, with no significant holes? Agree	4) Was it coherent in its content, with no significant holes? Neither agree nor disagree	4) Was it coherent in its content, with no significant holes? Disagree	4) Was it coherent in its content, with no significant holes? Strongly disagree
5) Are the materials/slides (on the DVD) a good source for post-tutorial information?	5) Are the materials/slides (on the DVD) a good source for post-tutorial information? Strongly Agree	5) Are the materials/slides (on the DVD) a good source for post-tutorial information? Agree	5) Are the materials/slides (on the DVD) a good source for post-tutorial information? Neither agree nor disagree	5) Are the materials/slides (on the DVD) a good source for post-tutorial information? Disagree	5) Are the materials/slides (on the DVD) a good source for post-tutorial information? Strongly disagree
6) Were the speakers receptive to questions?	6) Were the speakers receptive to questions? Strongly Agree	6) Were the speakers receptive to questions? Agree	6) Were the speakers receptive to questions? Neither agree nor disagree	6) Were the speakers receptive to questions? Disagree	6) Were the speakers receptive to questions? Strongly disagree
7) Did the course have the indicated level of difficulty?	7) Did the course have the indicated level of difficulty? Strongly Agree	7) Did the course have the indicated level of difficulty? Agree	7) Did the course have the indicated level of difficulty? Neither agree nor disagree	7) Did the course have the indicated level of difficulty? Disagree	7) Did the course have the indicated level of difficulty? Strongly disagree
8) Did you benefit from attending the course, that is, did you learn something valuable from it?	8) Did you benefit from attending the course, that is, did you learn something valuable from it? Strongly Agree	8) Did you benefit from attending the course, that is, did you learn something valuable from it? Agree	8) Did you benefit from attending the course, that is, did you learn something valuable from it? Neither agree nor disagree	8) Did you benefit from attending the course, that is, did you learn something valuable from it? Disagree	8) Did you benefit from attending the course, that is, did you learn something valuable from it? Strongly disagree
9) Would you recommend it to others?	9) Would you recommend it to others? Strongly Agree	9) Would you recommend it to others? Agree	9) Would you recommend it to others? Neither agree nor disagree	9) Would you recommend it to others? Disagree	9) Would you recommend it to others? Strongly disagree

VIS 2016 - Tutorials and Workshops Feedback

Your opinion is important to us! Your feedback helps tutorials and workshops organizers improve their sessions.

* 1. Select the workshop/tutorial for evaluation
(Please re-take this survey to give feedback for multiple workshops / tutorials):

* 2. Please select the number that closest reflects your opinion about the following:

* 3. Are there any suggestions for this course in the future.

* 4. Are there any specific comments you might have about organization, speaker composition, flow and length of topics, etc.?

Your opinion is important to us! Your feedback helps tutorials and workshops organizers improve their sessions.

* 1. Select the workshop/tutorial for evaluation (Please re-take this survey to give feedback for multiple workshops / tutorials):

* 2. Please select the number that closest reflects your opinion about the following:

* 3. Are there any suggestions for this course in the future.

* 4. Are there any specific comments you might have about organization, speaker composition, flow and length of topics, etc.?

* 1. Select the workshop/tutorial for evaluation
(Please re-take this survey to give feedback for multiple workshops / tutorials):