CockroachDB Geospatial Survey 2

CockroachDB Geospatial Support

CockroachDB is working to add geospatial support. Please answer this short (<3 mins) survey to help guide our thinking. 
1.Do you use any kind of public benchmark for geospatial performance? Do you recommend we benchmark with any public data set + queries?
2.Could you share with us a few example queries with a link to test data? In particular, we would like to understand what your performance expectations are for these queries.
3.For this example, what is the table size in rows with geospatial indexes?
4.Our implementation may involve indexing Planar Geometry objects within user-specified bounds (e.g. a bounding box from (-100,-100) to (100,100)) and not index accelerating queries outside this bound. Would this be a problem for you?
5.Do you use any operators (e.g., the & and ~ operator) which only work on bounding boxes of geospatial types? If so, why?
6.For nearest neighbor support, which of the following options matter most to you?
7.Most of the previous survey’s respondents used PostGIS over Postgres’ native geospatial implementation. Do you use Postgres' Geometric Functions and Operators?
8.Do you use a driver or ORM with your Geospatial applications?
9.What loading/extracting tools do you use? (check all that apply)
10.What tools do you use? (check all that apply)
Current Progress,
0 of 10 answered