Skip to content

Saturday, October 22, 2016 - ACOG District II Annual Meeting

Lecture Evaluation - Saturday, October 22, 2016

Please rate the following presenters based upon the quality of their materials and presentation skills.

1.Mary E. D'Alton, MD, FACOG
Neonatal Encephalopathy: A New Perspective

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Based on available science

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Well-organized

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Met expectations for learning

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Contained information relevant to my practice

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Audiovisual

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Syllabus

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Overall lecture grade

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

2.Roberto Romero, MD, D.Med.Sci., FACOG
Management Of The Short Cervix: Vaginal Progesterone, Cerclage Or A Pessary?

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Based on available science

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Well-organized

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Met expectations for learning

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Contained information relevant to my practice

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Audiovisual

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Syllabus

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Overall lecture grade

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

3.Ted L. Anderson, MD, PhD, FACOG, FACS
Operative In-Office Hysteroscopy (LECTURE) Endometrial Ablation (SIMULATION)

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Based on available science

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Well-organized

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Met expectations for learning

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Contained information relevant to my practice

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Audiovisual

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Syllabus

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Overall lecture grade

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

4.Helen Feltovich, MD, FACOG
How To Perform A Vaginal Scan: The Correct Way To Measure Cervical Length (LECTURE/SIMULATION)

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Based on available science

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Well-organized

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Met expectations for learning

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Contained information relevant to my practice

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Audiovisual

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Syllabus

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Overall lecture grade

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

5.Barbara S. Levy, MD, FACOG
The Future of Payment Policy: MACRA, MIPS, APMS, BUNDLES

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Based on available science

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Well-organized

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Met expectations for learning

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Contained information relevant to my practice

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Audiovisual

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Syllabus

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Overall lecture grade

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

6.Mary E. D'Alton, MD, FACOG
New Options For Fetal Monitoring Credentialing And The Need To Do It

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Based on available science

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Well-organized

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Met expectations for learning

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Contained information relevant to my practice

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Audiovisual

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Syllabus

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Overall lecture grade

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

7.Eva Chalas, MD, FACOG, FACS
Opportunistic Salpingectomy vs.Tubal Ligation In The OB Patient: Yes or No? (PANEL)

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Based on available science

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Well-organized

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Met expectations for learning

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Contained information relevant to my practice

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Audiovisual

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Syllabus

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Overall lecture grade

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

8.Christine Herde, MD, FACOG
Opportunistic Salpingectomy vs.Tubal Ligation In The OB Patient: Yes Or No? (PANEL)

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Based on available science

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Well-organized

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Met expectations for learning

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Contained information relevant to my practice

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Audiovisual

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Syllabus

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Overall lecture grade

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

9.Tom Bourne, Ph.D, FRCOG, FAIUM (hon)
Diagnosis Of Miscarriage: The International Consensus Conference & Beyond (LECTURE & SIMULATION)

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Based on available science

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Well-organized

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Met expectations for learning

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Contained information relevant to my practice

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Audiovisual

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Syllabus

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Overall lecture grade

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

10.Joanne Stone, MD, FACOG
New Trends In Induction Of Labor

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Based on available science

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Well-organized

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Met expectations for learning

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Contained information relevant to my practice

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Audiovisual

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Syllabus

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Overall lecture grade

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

11.Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, MD, FACOG
Incorporating Antenatal Corticosteroids Into Practice For Pregnancies At Risk Of Late Preterm Delivery

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Based on available science

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Well-organized

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Met expectations for learning

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Contained information relevant to my practice

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Audiovisual

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Syllabus

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Overall lecture grade

1 (poor)

2

3

4

5 (excellent)

Privacy & Cookie Notice