2020-2021 Annual Review Survey Question Title * 1. Did you receive your draft IEP in advance of the meeting? Yes, I received the full draft IEP at least 5 days before the meeting. Yes, but fewer than 5 days prior to the meeting No, I did not receive the draft IEP prior to the meeting Question Title * 2. If any evaluations were presented at the meeting, did you receive the evaluations at least 5 school days prior to the PPT meeting? Yes, I received the evaluations before the meeting and had the opportunity to discuss the results prior to the meeting Yes, I received the evaluations before the meeting but did not have the opportunity to discuss the results prior to the meeting Yes, but fewer than 5 days prior to the meeting No, the first time I saw the evaluations was at the meeting Not applicable - no evaluations were on the agenda Question Title * 3. Was there a phone call from a PPT team member to discuss the draft (goals, objectives, parent input) ahead of the meeting? Yes, I received a phone call from a member of my child's team at least 2-3 days before the meeting to answer my questions about the draft and review the proposed agenda. Yes, I received a phone call from a member of my child's team before the meeting but we did not discuss the proposed agenda. I received an email but not a phone call. Someone reached out via phone / email to schedule a time but scheduling conflicts did not allow for us to speak in advance. No, I was not contacted by anyone from the school prior to my Annual Review. Question Title * 4. Were the meeting norms reviewed and followed? Yes, the norms were introduced and the team members followed the norms throughout the meeting The norms were introduced but not all members followed the norms throughout the meeting No, the norms were not introduced, referenced or discussed Question Title * 5. Were participant roles discussed (ie. the reason for each person to attend the meeting)? Yes, each person introduced themselves and their relationship to my child and their role in the meeting No, each person just said their name and position No, no introductions were made Question Title * 6. Was an agenda used as part of the meeting, including a “parking lot” for non- agenda related items? The agenda was the same one shared at the pre-meeting phone called and included any of my suggestions and a "parking lot" for topics that were raised but not part of the agenda. The agenda was shared but did not include my input from the phone call The agenda did not include a parking lot No agenda was shared Question Title * 7. Was your input into the IEP considered and valued during the meeting? Yes, team members asked for my/our input about all sections of the IEP. Yes, Our comments and suggestions were valued and discussed, even if there were disagreements. No, I did not feel I was invited to be a participating member of the team. No, my comments/suggestions were not considered Question Title * 8. Was your child’s program clearly explained? Yes, at the end of the meeting, I clearly understood the components of the IEP and what my child's services would look like (who would be working with my child, where they would be working and the objectives they would be working on) No, I understand the goals and objectives but not how the services will be implemented and/or who will be providing the services Question Title * 9. Did you have sufficient time in the PPT to plan your child’s special education services for the next year? Yes, we accomplished all the items on the agenda No, we needed more time but none was offered No, but another meeting was offered/scheduled Question Title * 10. Did you receive the final draft of the IEP promptly after the meeting (within 5 school days)? Yes, I received the copy of the finalized IEP promptly after the meeting No, I received a copy but it was more than 5 school days after the meeting No, I still have not received a copy of the documents, including the finalized IEP Question Title * 11. Did the Recommendations and Written Prior Notice from the meeting (pages 2 and 3 of the IEP), match your recollection of the meeting? Yes, the Recommendations and Written Prior Notice accurately captured the decisions that were made at the meeting No, the information as written was accurate but did not reflect all the decision that were made including requests that were refused No, the Recommendations and Written Prior notice information were not accurate Question Title * 12. During the 2021-2022 school year, I would prefer that my child's Annual Review PPT be held: Remotely using Google Meets In Person Question Title * 13. School Cos Cob Glenville Hamilton Ave Inter School at Dundee Julian Curtiss New Lebanon North Mianus North Street Old Greenwich Parkway Riverside Eastern Middle Central Middle Western Middle Greenwich High School Preschool Out of District Private School Done