Skip to content
Friday, October 21, 2016 - ACOG District II Annual Meeting
Lecture Evaluation - Friday, October 21, 2016
Please rate the following presenters based upon the quality of their materials and presentation skills.
1.
Victor R. Cotton, MD, JD
Genetic Testing: The Next Wave Of Malpractice Lawsuits?
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Based on available science
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Well-organized
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Audiovisual
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Syllabus
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
2.
Andrew M. Kaunitz, MD, FACOG, NCMP
Treatment Of Menopausal Symptoms: A 2016 Update For Clinicians
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Based on available science
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Well-organized
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Audiovisual
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Syllabus
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
3.
Raymond Sandler, MD, FACOG
Vacuum Assisted Delivery Lecture And Simulation
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Based on available science
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Well-organized
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Audiovisual
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Syllabus
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
4.
Loraine O'Neill, RN, MPH
Vacuum Assisted Delivery Lecture And Simulation
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Based on available science
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Well-organized
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Audiovisual
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Syllabus
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
5.
John P. Curtin, MD, FACOG
Management Of Women With A Pelvic Mass: Update 2016
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Based on available science
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Well-organized
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Audiovisual
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Syllabus
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
6.
Christine Herde, MD, FACOG
Vaginal Health (PANEL)
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Based on available science
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Well-organized
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Audiovisual
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Syllabus
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
7.
Maura Reinblatt, MD, FACS
Vaginal Health (PANEL)
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Based on available science
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Well-organized
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Audiovisual
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Syllabus
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
8.
Peter Bernstein, MD, MPH, FACOG
Obstetric Simulation: Measuring Cumulative Blood Loss
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Based on available science
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Well-organized
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Audiovisual
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Syllabus
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
9.
Dena Goffman, MD, FACOG
Obstetric Simulation: Measuring Cumulative Blood Loss
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Based on available science
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Well-organized
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Audiovisual
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Syllabus
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)