Friday, October 21, 2016 - ACOG District II Annual Meeting

Lecture Evaluation - Friday, October 21, 2016

Please rate the following presenters based upon the quality of their materials and presentation skills.

Question Title

* 1. Victor R. Cotton, MD, JD
Genetic Testing: The Next Wave Of Malpractice Lawsuits?

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 2. Andrew M. Kaunitz, MD, FACOG, NCMP
Treatment Of Menopausal Symptoms: A 2016 Update For Clinicians

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 3. Raymond Sandler, MD, FACOG
Vacuum Assisted Delivery Lecture And Simulation

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 4. Loraine O'Neill, RN, MPH
Vacuum Assisted Delivery Lecture And Simulation

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 5. John P. Curtin, MD, FACOG
Management Of Women With A Pelvic Mass: Update 2016

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 6. Christine Herde, MD, FACOG
Vaginal Health (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 7. Maura Reinblatt, MD, FACS
Vaginal Health (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 8. Peter Bernstein, MD, MPH, FACOG
Obstetric Simulation: Measuring Cumulative Blood Loss

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 9. Dena Goffman, MD, FACOG
Obstetric Simulation: Measuring Cumulative Blood Loss

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)