The ISEAL Framework for Improving Sustainability Impacts is intended to guide sustainability standards and others in the choice of strategies and actions to drive better sustainability impacts.  It is premised on the idea that in order to be effective, we need to understand and respond to the context in which we’re operating and be able to measure and adapt our strategies as we learn what is working.

This survey focuses on the relevance and relative importance of the good practices laid out in the draft Framework. It will be easier to complete this survey if you have read the draft Framework and have it available for reference. Learn more about the consultation here.

Question Title

* 1. Your Name

Question Title

* 2. Organisation

Question Title

* 3. Email (optional, for follow-up)

Question Title

* 4. The overall framework (Figure 1) is structured around a learning feedback loop to improve the effectiveness of your strategies. How clear is this logic?

Question Title

* 5. How important is the following information for understanding the context in which you are working?

  Not at all A little bit Quite important Very important
Priority sustainability challenges
Key trends and opportunities
Influential stakeholders
Drivers of stakeholder behaviour
Who are the change agents
Existing initiatives

Question Title

* 6. Which of these analyses are useful for understanding the context? (select all that apply)

Question Title

* 7. The Framework focuses on value chain strategies and systemic strategies. How relevant is this distinction for your organisation’s work?

Question Title

* 8. Does the decision-making model (Figure 4) in section 3.2 make sense? Why or why not?

Question Title

* 9. How important is information about the following topics in determining if value chain approaches will be effective (section 3.2.1)?

  Not at all A little bit Quite important Very important
Producer context
Market context
Institutional context

Question Title

* 10. How important is collaboration for being able to scale up impacts of value chain actions?

Not at all Very important
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 11. How important are these factors for determining your role in implementing a strategy

  Not at all A little bit Quite important Very important
Organisational capacity
Where you add most value
Whether complementary roles needed
Potential for partnerships

Question Title

* 12. The Framework proposes a basic theory of change model (section 3.4) to map out how strategies should achieve the desired outcomes.  How useful is this and how can the guidance be improved?

Question Title

* 13. How important are each of these factors in informing the choice of metrics to measure performance (section 4.1)?

  Not at all A little bit Quite important Very important
How sustainability issue is defined
Cost of data collection and management
Representativeness of the metric
Responsiveness to changes in context
Ability to communicate progress
Relevance to audience needs

Question Title

* 14. The Framework suggests that measuring system change effectiveness is primarily about whether the intended outcomes are being achieved (section 4.2). What suggestions do you have for how to measure the effectiveness of system change strategies?

Question Title

* 15. Which of these criteria are important for ensuring the suitability of a data source? (select all that apply)

Question Title

* 16. To strengthen data quality and consistency, which of the following elements should be defined? (select all that apply)

Question Title

* 17. What type of guidance would make section 4.5 on Data analysis and insights more useful and practical?

Question Title

* 18. Is the distinction between status claims, trend claims, and subjective value claims useful (section 5.1)?

Question Title

* 19. Under what conditions should attribution claims (e.g. our actions resulted in this improvement in sustainability performance) be allowed (section 5.2)?

Question Title

* 20. How important is the following information in strengthening the integrity of a performance improvement claim?

  Not at all A little bit Quite important Very important
Evidence base behind the claim
Context to which the claim applies
To what and to whom the claim refers
Period of time to which the claim applies
When the data was collected
Who collected and analysed the data
Independent parties carrying out research
Methods used to analyse data and arrive at the claim
Consent of the affected parties to share information

Question Title

* 21. What additional feedback do you have that will help us to improve the usefulness of the guidance?

T