Skip to content
Do you think the new
Trinity Lutheran Church v Pauley
ruling would (and should) apply to the following situations where, in each case, a government program of grants, services or other benefits is offered?
1.
The municipal fire department is called to put out a fire at a church
YES, the new ruling would / should apply
NO, the new ruling wouldn't / shouldn't apply
2.
The state education department offers vouchers to parents who want to send their kids to private school. Mr. and Mrs. Jones apply to send their child to a parochial school
YES, the new ruling would / should apply
NO, the new ruling wouldn’t / shouldn’t apply
3.
The Federal Government launches a subsidy program to help public libraries upgrade their collections. The town library’s application asks to include copies of the Bible and the Koran.
YES, the new ruling would / should apply
NO, the new ruling wouldn’t / shouldn’t apply
4.
A city subsidizes Dial-A-Ride for senior citizens. An elderly couple asks the dispatcher to send a van to take them to church on Sunday.
YES, the new ruling would / should apply
NO, the new ruling wouldn’t / shouldn’t apply
5.
A state scholarship program for high-achieving college graduates receives an application requesting post-graduate tuition assistance at seminary, or at Notre Dame.
YES, the new ruling would / should apply
NO, the new ruling wouldn’t / shouldn’t apply
6.
When it comes to whether this new ruling would / should affect your own church, are there scenarios not listed here that you’re curious about?
YES, the new ruling would / should apply
NO, the new ruling wouldn’t / shouldn’t apply
7.
When it comes to whether this new ruling would / should affect your own church, are there scenarios
not
listed here that you’re curious about?