Webinar Survey: “Next Steps in Mental/Behavioral Health Integration: Increasing Your Skills in Collaboration with the NJPPC" (October 12, 2021)

Thank you for attending our webinar, “Next Steps in Mental/Behavioral Health Integration: Increasing Your Skills in Collaboration with the NJPPC" with Steven Kairys, MD, MPH, FAAP, Melissa Wallach, MD, FAAP, Ruth Gubernick, PhD, MPH, PCMH, CCE, Jose Posos, M.Ed., LPC on October 12, 2021 12-1 p.m.

If you would like to enroll in our Advanced Mental/Behavioral Health Learning Collaborative, please click here to register for our orientation on October 22, 2021 12-1 p.m. For more information, please contact the Mental Health Collaborative Team: mhc@njaap.org.

Your feedback is greatly appreciated.

This survey is required for all those seeking CME/MOC Part 2 credit. Upon completion of this survey, your certificate will be emailed within 30 days.

Question Title

* 1. Demographics

First Name

Last Name

Credentials (MD, DO, APN, PA, etc.)

Practice/Organization Name

ABP Diplomate # (required for MOC Part 2 points)

Email Address (to issue credit certificate)

Question Title

* 2. What type of credit(s) are you seeking? (please note nursing credits are not being offered)

CME only

CME and MOC part 2

N/A

Question Title

* 3. How did you view this webinar?

Viewed Live on October 12, 2021

Viewed the archived recording of the webinar

Question Title

* 4. Please indicate the rate at which you agree with the following statements.
At the conclusion of this activity, participants will be able to:

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Understand the importance of integrating mental/behavioral health care screening and care coordination into routine pediatric primary or specialty care	Understand the importance of integrating mental/behavioral health care screening and care coordination into routine pediatric primary or specialty care Strongly Agree	Understand the importance of integrating mental/behavioral health care screening and care coordination into routine pediatric primary or specialty care Agree	Understand the importance of integrating mental/behavioral health care screening and care coordination into routine pediatric primary or specialty care Neutral	Understand the importance of integrating mental/behavioral health care screening and care coordination into routine pediatric primary or specialty care Disagree	Understand the importance of integrating mental/behavioral health care screening and care coordination into routine pediatric primary or specialty care Strongly Disagree
Identify age-appropriate, validated, standardize tools for primary as well as secondary screening for ADHD, anxiety, depression, and other mental/behavioral health issues	Identify age-appropriate, validated, standardize tools for primary as well as secondary screening for ADHD, anxiety, depression, and other mental/behavioral health issues Strongly Agree	Identify age-appropriate, validated, standardize tools for primary as well as secondary screening for ADHD, anxiety, depression, and other mental/behavioral health issues Agree	Identify age-appropriate, validated, standardize tools for primary as well as secondary screening for ADHD, anxiety, depression, and other mental/behavioral health issues Neutral	Identify age-appropriate, validated, standardize tools for primary as well as secondary screening for ADHD, anxiety, depression, and other mental/behavioral health issues Disagree	Identify age-appropriate, validated, standardize tools for primary as well as secondary screening for ADHD, anxiety, depression, and other mental/behavioral health issues Strongly Disagree
Describe the process for joining and collaborating with the New Jersey Pediatric Psychiatry Collaborative (NJPPC), a network of mental/behavioral health consultative support for pediatric primary care providers and specialists	Describe the process for joining and collaborating with the New Jersey Pediatric Psychiatry Collaborative (NJPPC), a network of mental/behavioral health consultative support for pediatric primary care providers and specialists Strongly Agree	Describe the process for joining and collaborating with the New Jersey Pediatric Psychiatry Collaborative (NJPPC), a network of mental/behavioral health consultative support for pediatric primary care providers and specialists Agree	Describe the process for joining and collaborating with the New Jersey Pediatric Psychiatry Collaborative (NJPPC), a network of mental/behavioral health consultative support for pediatric primary care providers and specialists Neutral	Describe the process for joining and collaborating with the New Jersey Pediatric Psychiatry Collaborative (NJPPC), a network of mental/behavioral health consultative support for pediatric primary care providers and specialists Disagree	Describe the process for joining and collaborating with the New Jersey Pediatric Psychiatry Collaborative (NJPPC), a network of mental/behavioral health consultative support for pediatric primary care providers and specialists Strongly Disagree
Discuss the opportunity to participate in the ABP-approved Mental Health Collaborative Advanced Learning Collaborative for skill advancement and practice quality improvement	Discuss the opportunity to participate in the ABP-approved Mental Health Collaborative Advanced Learning Collaborative for skill advancement and practice quality improvement Strongly Agree	Discuss the opportunity to participate in the ABP-approved Mental Health Collaborative Advanced Learning Collaborative for skill advancement and practice quality improvement Agree	Discuss the opportunity to participate in the ABP-approved Mental Health Collaborative Advanced Learning Collaborative for skill advancement and practice quality improvement Neutral	Discuss the opportunity to participate in the ABP-approved Mental Health Collaborative Advanced Learning Collaborative for skill advancement and practice quality improvement Disagree	Discuss the opportunity to participate in the ABP-approved Mental Health Collaborative Advanced Learning Collaborative for skill advancement and practice quality improvement Strongly Disagree
Apply the Model for Improvement framework for practice change	Apply the Model for Improvement framework for practice change Strongly Agree	Apply the Model for Improvement framework for practice change Agree	Apply the Model for Improvement framework for practice change Neutral	Apply the Model for Improvement framework for practice change Disagree	Apply the Model for Improvement framework for practice change Strongly Disagree

Question Title

* 5. How valuable was today’s session to your practice?

Very Valuable

Somewhat Valuable

Not at All Valuable

Question Title

* 6. What is one new thing you learned from this presentation?

Question Title

* 7. What 2 to 3 things will you implement or do differently in your practice based on what you learned?

Question Title

* 8. Presenter: Steven Kairys, MD, MPH, FAAP

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Organization of Presentation	Organization of Presentation Excellent	Organization of Presentation Very Good	Organization of Presentation Good	Organization of Presentation Fair	Organization of Presentation Poor
Clarity of Presentation	Clarity of Presentation Excellent	Clarity of Presentation Very Good	Clarity of Presentation Good	Clarity of Presentation Fair	Clarity of Presentation Poor
Appropriateness for your level of training	Appropriateness for your level of training Excellent	Appropriateness for your level of training Very Good	Appropriateness for your level of training Good	Appropriateness for your level of training Fair	Appropriateness for your level of training Poor
Relevance to practice	Relevance to practice Excellent	Relevance to practice Very Good	Relevance to practice Good	Relevance to practice Fair	Relevance to practice Poor

Question Title

* 9. Was the speaker's presentation free from commercial bias?

Yes

Question Title

* 10. Presenter: Melissa Wallach, MD, FAAP

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Organization of Presentation	Organization of Presentation Excellent	Organization of Presentation Very Good	Organization of Presentation Good	Organization of Presentation Fair	Organization of Presentation Poor
Clarity of Presentation	Clarity of Presentation Excellent	Clarity of Presentation Very Good	Clarity of Presentation Good	Clarity of Presentation Fair	Clarity of Presentation Poor
Appropriateness for your level of training	Appropriateness for your level of training Excellent	Appropriateness for your level of training Very Good	Appropriateness for your level of training Good	Appropriateness for your level of training Fair	Appropriateness for your level of training Poor
Relevance to practice	Relevance to practice Excellent	Relevance to practice Very Good	Relevance to practice Good	Relevance to practice Fair	Relevance to practice Poor

Question Title

* 11. Was the speaker's presentation free from commercial bias?

Yes

Question Title

* 12. Presenter: Ruth Gubernick, PhD, MPH, PCMH, CCE

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Organization of Presentation	Organization of Presentation Excellent	Organization of Presentation Very Good	Organization of Presentation Good	Organization of Presentation Fair	Organization of Presentation Poor
Clarity of Presentation	Clarity of Presentation Excellent	Clarity of Presentation Very Good	Clarity of Presentation Good	Clarity of Presentation Fair	Clarity of Presentation Poor
Appropriateness for your level of training	Appropriateness for your level of training Excellent	Appropriateness for your level of training Very Good	Appropriateness for your level of training Good	Appropriateness for your level of training Fair	Appropriateness for your level of training Poor
Relevance to practice	Relevance to practice Excellent	Relevance to practice Very Good	Relevance to practice Good	Relevance to practice Fair	Relevance to practice Poor

Question Title

* 13. Was the speaker's presentation free from commercial bias?

Yes

Question Title

* 14. Presenter: Jose Posos, M.Ed., LPC

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Organization of Presentation	Organization of Presentation Excellent	Organization of Presentation Very Good	Organization of Presentation Good	Organization of Presentation Fair	Organization of Presentation Poor
Clarity of Presentation	Clarity of Presentation Excellent	Clarity of Presentation Very Good	Clarity of Presentation Good	Clarity of Presentation Fair	Clarity of Presentation Poor
Appropriateness for your level of training	Appropriateness for your level of training Excellent	Appropriateness for your level of training Very Good	Appropriateness for your level of training Good	Appropriateness for your level of training Fair	Appropriateness for your level of training Poor
Relevance to practice	Relevance to practice Excellent	Relevance to practice Very Good	Relevance to practice Good	Relevance to practice Fair	Relevance to practice Poor

Question Title

* 15. Was the speaker's presentation free from commercial bias?

Yes

Question Title

* 16. Evaluate the Overall Program

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Program increased my competence in this area	Program increased my competence in this area Excellent	Program increased my competence in this area Very Good	Program increased my competence in this area Good	Program increased my competence in this area Fair	Program increased my competence in this area Poor
Program will help me improve patient outcomes	Program will help me improve patient outcomes Excellent	Program will help me improve patient outcomes Very Good	Program will help me improve patient outcomes Good	Program will help me improve patient outcomes Fair	Program will help me improve patient outcomes Poor
This educational activity was valuable for my practice and/or performance	This educational activity was valuable for my practice and/or performance Excellent	This educational activity was valuable for my practice and/or performance Very Good	This educational activity was valuable for my practice and/or performance Good	This educational activity was valuable for my practice and/or performance Fair	This educational activity was valuable for my practice and/or performance Poor
The presentation was based upon scientific evidence	The presentation was based upon scientific evidence Excellent	The presentation was based upon scientific evidence Very Good	The presentation was based upon scientific evidence Good	The presentation was based upon scientific evidence Fair	The presentation was based upon scientific evidence Poor
Speaker disclosure was communicated verbally or in writing	Speaker disclosure was communicated verbally or in writing Excellent	Speaker disclosure was communicated verbally or in writing Very Good	Speaker disclosure was communicated verbally or in writing Good	Speaker disclosure was communicated verbally or in writing Fair	Speaker disclosure was communicated verbally or in writing Poor

Webinar Survey: “Next Steps in Mental/Behavioral Health Integration: Increasing Your Skills in Collaboration with the NJPPC" (October 12, 2021)

Question Title

* 1. Demographics

Question Title

* 2. What type of credit(s) are you seeking? (please note nursing credits are not being offered)

Question Title

* 3. How did you view this webinar?

Question Title

* 4. Please indicate the rate at which you agree with the following statements.
At the conclusion of this activity, participants will be able to:

Question Title

* 5. How valuable was today’s session to your practice?

Question Title

* 6. What is one new thing you learned from this presentation?

Question Title

* 7. What 2 to 3 things will you implement or do differently in your practice based on what you learned?

Question Title

* 8. Presenter: Steven Kairys, MD, MPH, FAAP

Question Title

* 9. Was the speaker's presentation free from commercial bias?

Question Title

* 10. Presenter: Melissa Wallach, MD, FAAP

Question Title

* 11. Was the speaker's presentation free from commercial bias?

Question Title

* 12. Presenter: Ruth Gubernick, PhD, MPH, PCMH, CCE

Question Title

* 13. Was the speaker's presentation free from commercial bias?

Question Title

* 14. Presenter: Jose Posos, M.Ed., LPC

Question Title

* 15. Was the speaker's presentation free from commercial bias?

Question Title

* 16. Evaluate the Overall Program

Question Title

* 17. What other mental/behavioral health-related topics are you interested in learning more about?

Question Title

* 18. Additional Comments:

Question Title

* 1. Demographics

Question Title

* 2. What type of credit(s) are you seeking? (please note nursing credits are not being offered)

Question Title

* 3. How did you view this webinar?

Question Title

* 4. Please indicate the rate at which you agree with the following statements.At the conclusion of this activity, participants will be able to:

Question Title

* 5. How valuable was today’s session to your practice?

Question Title

* 6. What is one new thing you learned from this presentation?

Question Title

* 7. What 2 to 3 things will you implement or do differently in your practice based on what you learned?

Question Title

* 8. Presenter: Steven Kairys, MD, MPH, FAAP

Question Title

* 9. Was the speaker's presentation free from commercial bias?

Question Title

* 10. Presenter: Melissa Wallach, MD, FAAP

Question Title

* 11. Was the speaker's presentation free from commercial bias?

Question Title

* 12. Presenter: Ruth Gubernick, PhD, MPH, PCMH, CCE

Question Title

* 13. Was the speaker's presentation free from commercial bias?

Question Title

* 14. Presenter: Jose Posos, M.Ed., LPC

Question Title

* 15. Was the speaker's presentation free from commercial bias?

Question Title

* 16. Evaluate the Overall Program

Question Title

* 17. What other mental/behavioral health-related topics are you interested in learning more about?

Question Title

* 18. Additional Comments:

* 4. Please indicate the rate at which you agree with the following statements.
At the conclusion of this activity, participants will be able to: