Teacher Prep Review Open Comment Survey
Clinical Practice Standard

Introduction
Thank you for your interest in providing feedback to inform a revised Teacher Prep Review Clinical Practice standard.

Your feedback will help ensure that this revised standard is valid and reliable, that it fairly reflects current research based practices in teacher preparation programs, and that it provides clear and actionable feedback to programs.

Your responses are anonymous. We will not collect any identifying information.

You can submit feedback as an individual or as an organization.

About the Teacher Prep Review
The Teacher Prep Review (TPR) evaluates the quality of preservice preparation provided to future teachers. The first TPR was released in 2013, although the development of standards dates back nearly a decade before that. The TPR considers a range of factors for which high quality evidence supports a clear standard. The TPR examines approximately 1,200 traditional undergraduate and graduate elementary teacher preparation programs.

About the Clinical Practice standard
This standard evaluates whether programs have set guidelines and policies to ensure that candidates have a high-quality, research-aligned clinical practice experience. The standard does not look at the performance of individual candidates, but rather at the policies and practices the teacher prep program has put in place so that all candidates have the opportunity to learn and practice essential skills.

For the Clinical Practice standard, NCTQ intends to evaluate preparation programs against the following claim: “Educator preparation programs provide elementary teacher candidates with robust and well-supported opportunities to practice teaching in authentic classroom settings, under the supervision of an instructionally effective cooperating teacher, with ongoing monitoring by the prep program.”

This standard will be used to evaluate traditional undergraduate and graduate programs.

NCTQ gathers documents that describe fieldwork, student teaching requirements, and program policies for teacher candidates pursuing an elementary teaching credential through submissions by teacher preparation programs and a review of publicly available material. The intent is to evaluate the requirements against research and expert insights on clinical practice.

For a detailed description of the content, data sources, and evaluation criteria for this proposed standard, including how it differs from NCTQ's earlier Clinical Practice standard, please visit the Clinical Practice Standard Revision page. The background information on this page will be useful for responding to the following questions.
Section 1: Identifying the appropriate aspects of clinical practice for the Teacher Prep Review to measure

The Clinical Practice Framework (2024) sets out the six focus areas of clinical practice backed by research and supported by the field as the most important to build a quality clinical practice experience. NCTQ worked with our expert advisory panel to identify elements from the Framework that were not only important to a high-quality clinical experience, but also likely to be visible in extant program documents, such that they could be included in the revised Clinical Practice Standard, and plausibly within the control of prep programs.
1.For each element below, please indicate whether you believe the element is (1) essential to providing candidates a high-quality clinical experience, (2) able to be fairly assessed using extant documents, and (3) within the control of the teacher preparation program.

See examples of what each indicator includes here.
Essential to quality
Fair to assess from extant documents
Within the prep program’s control
The prep program has formal partnerships with districts (Focus Area 1)
The prep program provides stipends or other incentives to cooperating teachers (Focus Area 2)
The prep program provides stipends to student teachers (Focus Area 2)
The prep program requires cooperating teachers to be instructionally effective (Focus Area 2)
The prep program requires cooperating teachers to have mentoring experience (Focus Area 2)
The prep program provides support for student teachers of color (Focus Area 2)
The prep program provides training for cooperating teachers (Focus Area 3)
The prep program provides training for program supervisors (Focus Area 3)
The prep program provides clear observation guidance to the cooperating teacher and/or program supervisor (Focus Area 3)
The prep program provides a range of field experiences (across early experiences and student teaching) (Focus Area 4)
The prep program intentionally aligns field experiences with expected employment (Focus Area 4)
The prep program takes a leading role in coordinating placements (Focus Area 4)
The prep program ensures candidates have early field experiences prior to full-time student teaching (Focus Area 5)
The prep program requires full-time student teaching with gradual increase of responsibility (Focus Area 5)
The prep program requires frequent program supervisor observations (Focus Area 5)
The prep program uses an observation instrument aligned with state, local expectations (Focus Area 5)
The prep program prepares candidates to use high-quality instructional materials in the lesson plans they use for student teaching. (Focus Area 5)
The prep program prepares candidates to use high-quality instructional materials by placing student teachers in districts that use HQIM (Focus Area 5)
The prep program collects feedback from student teachers (Focus Area 6)
The prep program collects feedback from cooperating teachers (Focus Area 6)
2.Are there other elements of clinical practice not included above that you believe are essential to providing candidates a high-quality clinical experience, able to be fairly assessed using extant documents, and within the control of the teacher preparation program that you believe should be a part of NCTQ’s Clinical Practice standard?
3.Within the focus area of student teacher - cooperating teacher matches, we intend to look for evidence of support for student teachers of color.

Potential actions could include:
  • whether the prep program takes any steps to recruit a diverse cohort of cooperating teachers (counting diversity across many measures including racial diversity, linguistic diversity, and gender diversity),
  • whether the prep program can disaggregate feedback from candidates along demographic information, and
  • whether the prep program offers student teachers a process to navigate instances of bias.
However, given the current political climate, we recognize the complexity of this question. To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
Strongly agree
Agree
No opinion
Disagree
Strongly disagree
It is important for prep programs to support candidates of color during student teaching
The actions described above are fair measures of prep programs’ support for candidates of color
I am concerned about prep programs receiving a score in this area because of current state or federal law or perceptions of providing support for candidates of color
I am concerned about the specific indicators proposed because they may violate state or federal laws
4.Please provide any further comments or explanation for your answers related to support for students of color here:
5.The Clinical Practice standard proposes looking for evidence of early field experiences prior to full-time student teaching. As technology advances, prep programs are exploring different approaches to providing field experiences. Which of the following should count as providing adequate field experience prior to full-time student teaching? (check all that apply)
6.Please use this space for any other feedback on the proposed content of the Clinical Practice standard.