2024 Forum on Criminal Justice Session Evaluations

Question Title

* 1. Please select the name of the session you are evaluating.

Welcome/Opening Keynote: Taking Stock: Reflections on 50 Years of Crime and Punishment in America

Morning Plenary Session: Multijurisdictional Crime Solutions to Prevent Crime and Victimization

Lunch: It Can’t Happen Here

Implementing Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) in Jail-based Corrections

Building a State-level Community Violence Intervention (CVI) Support Framework

Violent Crime Reduction Strategies for Rural Law Enforcement Agencies

Peer Support Partnerships: Improving Treatment Engagement and Outcomes in Corrections

Exploring Different Ways SAAs Issue Subawards

Youth Violence What is Working and What Isn’t

Subrecipient Monitoring

Breaking the Cycle: Exploring the Lethal Nexus of Intimate Partner Violence and Firearms

Practical Strategies for Breaking Down Siloes with Behavioral Health

Deaths in Custody Reporting Act (DCRA) Updates and Q&A

50 Years of Supporting State and Local Criminal Justice: NCJA 50th Anniversary

Inside the Beltway

Language Access What You Need to Know

Artificial Intelligence: The Future of Criminal Justice

Rehabilitative Technologies in Corrections: Problem, Solution and Roadmap

Lunch and Keynote Crime Trends: Are They Up or Down and Why is the Data so Unclear?

Equity in Grants Administration and Public Safety Funding

Designing Safe and Secure Communities: Implementing Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED)

Combating Hate Crimes Where We Learn and Worship: Understanding hate crimes and how technology can keep houses of worship and schools safe

Measuring Efficacy of Programs

Office for Victims of Crime, Human Trafficking Division: Overview of Services, Support and Trends

Jail and Prison Substance Use Disorder and Suicide

Closing Keynote with ONCDP Director Rahul Gupta

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall impressions of this session.

	Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	Strongly Agree
The session met my expectations.	The session met my expectations. Strongly Disagree	The session met my expectations. 2	The session met my expectations. 3	The session met my expectations. 4	The session met my expectations. Strongly Agree
Session content was coherent and well-developed.	Session content was coherent and well-developed. Strongly Disagree	Session content was coherent and well-developed. 2	Session content was coherent and well-developed. 3	Session content was coherent and well-developed. 4	Session content was coherent and well-developed. Strongly Agree
The session offered new insight and knowledge.	The session offered new insight and knowledge. Strongly Disagree	The session offered new insight and knowledge. 2	The session offered new insight and knowledge. 3	The session offered new insight and knowledge. 4	The session offered new insight and knowledge. Strongly Agree
The presenters made the most effective use of the allotted time.	The presenters made the most effective use of the allotted time. Strongly Disagree	The presenters made the most effective use of the allotted time. 2	The presenters made the most effective use of the allotted time. 3	The presenters made the most effective use of the allotted time. 4	The presenters made the most effective use of the allotted time. Strongly Agree
The presenters knew and understood the concepts and issues.	The presenters knew and understood the concepts and issues. Strongly Disagree	The presenters knew and understood the concepts and issues. 2	The presenters knew and understood the concepts and issues. 3	The presenters knew and understood the concepts and issues. 4	The presenters knew and understood the concepts and issues. Strongly Agree
The presenters held my attention and presented with interest/knowledge.	The presenters held my attention and presented with interest/knowledge. Strongly Disagree	The presenters held my attention and presented with interest/knowledge. 2	The presenters held my attention and presented with interest/knowledge. 3	The presenters held my attention and presented with interest/knowledge. 4	The presenters held my attention and presented with interest/knowledge. Strongly Agree
The presenters related to the group, answered questions, and responded to concerns.	The presenters related to the group, answered questions, and responded to concerns. Strongly Disagree	The presenters related to the group, answered questions, and responded to concerns. 2	The presenters related to the group, answered questions, and responded to concerns. 3	The presenters related to the group, answered questions, and responded to concerns. 4	The presenters related to the group, answered questions, and responded to concerns. Strongly Agree
The presenters used presentation methods that best suited session content.	The presenters used presentation methods that best suited session content. Strongly Disagree	The presenters used presentation methods that best suited session content. 2	The presenters used presentation methods that best suited session content. 3	The presenters used presentation methods that best suited session content. 4	The presenters used presentation methods that best suited session content. Strongly Agree

2024 Forum on Criminal Justice Session Evaluations

Question Title

* 1. Please select the name of the session you are evaluating.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall impressions of this session.

Question Title

* 3. What did you like best about this session?

Question Title

* 4. What did you like least about this session?

Question Title

* 5. What benefits have you received from attending this session?

Question Title

* 6. Additional comments or suggestions: