Exit this survey

2017 Climate and Ocean Education Symposium Final Eval

1. 2017 COES final evaluation

Thank you for joining us for the 2017 COES. This symposium was co-hosted by MBARI (with funding from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation), Stevenson School, WorldTeach, and the Micronesia Conservation Trust.

Question Title

1. This year we were fortunate to have researchers who stayed the entire workshop - do you have any suggestions for how to enhance your interactions with them?

Question Title

2. Rate your content knowledge (1 - I'm a total novice to 7 - I'm an expert) on the following:

	I'm a total novice	2	3	4	5	6	7
Climate Change in the Pacific Islands	Climate Change in the Pacific Islands I'm a total novice	Climate Change in the Pacific Islands 2	Climate Change in the Pacific Islands 3	Climate Change in the Pacific Islands 4	Climate Change in the Pacific Islands 5	Climate Change in the Pacific Islands 6	Climate Change in the Pacific Islands 7
Climate Change in general	Climate Change in general I'm a total novice	Climate Change in general 2	Climate Change in general 3	Climate Change in general 4	Climate Change in general 5	Climate Change in general 6	Climate Change in general 7
WorldTeach	WorldTeach I'm a total novice	WorldTeach 2	WorldTeach 3	WorldTeach 4	WorldTeach 5	WorldTeach 6	WorldTeach 7
Sea Level Rise	Sea Level Rise I'm a total novice	Sea Level Rise 2	Sea Level Rise 3	Sea Level Rise 4	Sea Level Rise 5	Sea Level Rise 6	Sea Level Rise 7
Ocean Acidification	Ocean Acidification I'm a total novice	Ocean Acidification 2	Ocean Acidification 3	Ocean Acidification 4	Ocean Acidification 5	Ocean Acidification 6	Ocean Acidification 7
Global Warming	Global Warming I'm a total novice	Global Warming 2	Global Warming 3	Global Warming 4	Global Warming 5	Global Warming 6	Global Warming 7
surface currents in the Pacific	surface currents in the Pacific I'm a total novice	surface currents in the Pacific 2	surface currents in the Pacific 3	surface currents in the Pacific 4	surface currents in the Pacific 5	surface currents in the Pacific 6	surface currents in the Pacific 7
Ocean Literacy Principles	Ocean Literacy Principles I'm a total novice	Ocean Literacy Principles 2	Ocean Literacy Principles 3	Ocean Literacy Principles 4	Ocean Literacy Principles 5	Ocean Literacy Principles 6	Ocean Literacy Principles 7

Question Title

3. On a scale of 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good), please rate how confident you feel teaching about:

	Very Poor	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good
accessing real data for science investigations	accessing real data for science investigations Very Poor	accessing real data for science investigations Poor	accessing real data for science investigations Fair	accessing real data for science investigations Good	accessing real data for science investigations Very Good
using real data to develop testable questions	using real data to develop testable questions Very Poor	using real data to develop testable questions Poor	using real data to develop testable questions Fair	using real data to develop testable questions Good	using real data to develop testable questions Very Good
designing an investigation to explore a question with data	designing an investigation to explore a question with data Very Poor	designing an investigation to explore a question with data Poor	designing an investigation to explore a question with data Fair	designing an investigation to explore a question with data Good	designing an investigation to explore a question with data Very Good
conducting a self-designed investigation	conducting a self-designed investigation Very Poor	conducting a self-designed investigation Poor	conducting a self-designed investigation Fair	conducting a self-designed investigation Good	conducting a self-designed investigation Very Good
creating data visualizations	creating data visualizations Very Poor	creating data visualizations Poor	creating data visualizations Fair	creating data visualizations Good	creating data visualizations Very Good
interpreting data	interpreting data Very Poor	interpreting data Poor	interpreting data Fair	interpreting data Good	interpreting data Very Good
synthesizing data	synthesizing data Very Poor	synthesizing data Poor	synthesizing data Fair	synthesizing data Good	synthesizing data Very Good
presenting results from an investigations to peers	presenting results from an investigations to peers Very Poor	presenting results from an investigations to peers Poor	presenting results from an investigations to peers Fair	presenting results from an investigations to peers Good	presenting results from an investigations to peers Very Good

Question Title

4. If you have an idea - which activity are you interested in trying out this year in your classroom? Since we do not 'graduate' every one of our activities to the main lesson plan links, it is helpful to find out which ones are more likely to be used in the classroom.

Question Title

5. We are thinking of doing another COES next year but the timing depends on schedules of you, researchers, and space at the host institution - but if you could let me know your preferences for specific dates (e.g. early or late June, July, August), that would be helpful to know as well (and why - e.g. school ends on June 15th or starts on August 1).

Question Title

6. What aspect of the workshop was most attractive/useful to you? (e.g. interactions with other teachers/scientists; activity development; exposure to data; etc)

Question Title

7. Do you have any suggestions for how we might improve dissemination of EARTH and your activities? on-line workshops? social networking? meetings? web animations? cable tv?

Question Title

8. Please let me know if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding the EARTH program. Or if you no longer want to be contacted by me, please let me know that as well.

Question Title

9. Please use this space to add anything else that you want - suggestions for improving, aspects that you didn't like, things you did like, topic that you would like covered next year, etc