Building a Strong Future for Science

Prime Minister Tony Abbott has announced his new Ministry - omitting a dedicated Science Minister for this first time since 1931. A move that has raised concerns and questions among the scientific community about how science will be treated in the next three years.

The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers Australia (APESMA) is working to create a strong voice for the interests of science, and science professionals, in this new environment.

By filling in this short survey, you will help us represent the views of scientists, and supporters of scientific endeavour to government.

Any answers you provide will be treated confidentially at all times.

Question Title

* 1. Name:

Question Title

* 2. Email:

Question Title

* 3. Are you a member of APESMA?

Yes

Question Title

* 4. What is your connection to science?

I work in science.

I support science.

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 5. If you work in science, what area do you work in?

Question Title

* 6. How important do you think it is to have a Science Minister?

Very important

Important

Neutral

Not important

Question Title

* 7. What do you think are some of the impacts of not having a Science Minister?

Question Title

* 8. In the absence of a Science Minister, how important is the role of Australia's Chief Scientist in communicating with the Prime Minister and Government?

The Chief Scientist will be vital in communicating science needs to the Government.

The Chief Scientist will be important.

Not sure of the role the Chief Scientist plays.

The Chief Scientist is not important.

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 9. Do you think science will be devalued by spreading responsibility for it across several portfolios?

Yes

Question Title

* 10. Do you support the call for scientific research funding to be 2.2% GDP (which would keep Australia in the middle of pack on OECD nations)?

Yes

Question Title

* 11. What do you see as the biggest issues facing science in the next three years? (Tick as many as apply)

Funding constraints.

Lack of coherent policy direction and focus

Division and fragmentation of scientific endeavour.

Inability to attract new generation of science professionals due to reduced/limited opportunities.

Brain drain, as science professionals go overseas for opportunities.

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 12. What positive changes are needed to improve science in Australia? (Tick as many as apply)

More funding for science and innovation.

Funding that is strategic and sustainable, to tackle long-term, complex problems.

More science and maths education in schools.

Improve grant application and award process.

Better pay and conditions for science professionals.

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 13. What are your biggest concerns for the future of science?

Question Title

* 14. Would you like to provide any additional comments to assist APESMA in advocating for science professionals and the future of science in Australia?

Authorised by Chris Walton, CEO of the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers Australia (APESMA). APESMA represents over 25,000 professionals in science, technology, engineering and allied professions across Australia. For more information visit www.apesma.com.au