2019 Controversies Symposium - Sunday, August 11

Attendee Evaluation

Please rate the FACULTY in their substantive knowledge, delivery style and presentation quality.

Question Title

* 1. Neuromodulators: Short, Medium and Long Acting - How is the Landscape Changing?

	EXCELLENT	VERY GOOD	SATISFACTORY	BELOW AVERAGE	POOR
Gary Monheit, MD	Gary Monheit, MD EXCELLENT	Gary Monheit, MD VERY GOOD	Gary Monheit, MD SATISFACTORY	Gary Monheit, MD BELOW AVERAGE	Gary Monheit, MD POOR
Michael Kaminer, MD	Michael Kaminer, MD EXCELLENT	Michael Kaminer, MD VERY GOOD	Michael Kaminer, MD SATISFACTORY	Michael Kaminer, MD BELOW AVERAGE	Michael Kaminer, MD POOR
Murad Alam, MD, MBA	Murad Alam, MD, MBA EXCELLENT	Murad Alam, MD, MBA VERY GOOD	Murad Alam, MD, MBA SATISFACTORY	Murad Alam, MD, MBA BELOW AVERAGE	Murad Alam, MD, MBA POOR
Suzanne Kilmer, MD (panelist)	Suzanne Kilmer, MD (panelist) EXCELLENT	Suzanne Kilmer, MD (panelist) VERY GOOD	Suzanne Kilmer, MD (panelist) SATISFACTORY	Suzanne Kilmer, MD (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	Suzanne Kilmer, MD (panelist) POOR
Zakia Rahman, MD (panelist)	Zakia Rahman, MD (panelist) EXCELLENT	Zakia Rahman, MD (panelist) VERY GOOD	Zakia Rahman, MD (panelist) SATISFACTORY	Zakia Rahman, MD (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	Zakia Rahman, MD (panelist) POOR
James Newman, MD, FACS (panelist)	James Newman, MD, FACS (panelist) EXCELLENT	James Newman, MD, FACS (panelist) VERY GOOD	James Newman, MD, FACS (panelist) SATISFACTORY	James Newman, MD, FACS (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	James Newman, MD, FACS (panelist) POOR

Question Title

* 2. Body Contouring: Cold vs. Heat - Fat, Muscle, Both?

	EXCELLENT	VERY GOOD	SATISFACTORY	BELOW AVERAGE	POOR
Omar Ibrahimi, MD, PhD	Omar Ibrahimi, MD, PhD EXCELLENT	Omar Ibrahimi, MD, PhD VERY GOOD	Omar Ibrahimi, MD, PhD SATISFACTORY	Omar Ibrahimi, MD, PhD BELOW AVERAGE	Omar Ibrahimi, MD, PhD POOR
Suzanne Kilmer, MD	Suzanne Kilmer, MD EXCELLENT	Suzanne Kilmer, MD VERY GOOD	Suzanne Kilmer, MD SATISFACTORY	Suzanne Kilmer, MD BELOW AVERAGE	Suzanne Kilmer, MD POOR
A. Jay Burns, MD, FACS	A. Jay Burns, MD, FACS EXCELLENT	A. Jay Burns, MD, FACS VERY GOOD	A. Jay Burns, MD, FACS SATISFACTORY	A. Jay Burns, MD, FACS BELOW AVERAGE	A. Jay Burns, MD, FACS POOR
Robert Weiss, MD	Robert Weiss, MD EXCELLENT	Robert Weiss, MD VERY GOOD	Robert Weiss, MD SATISFACTORY	Robert Weiss, MD BELOW AVERAGE	Robert Weiss, MD POOR
Jeffrey Hsu, MD (panelist)	Jeffrey Hsu, MD (panelist) EXCELLENT	Jeffrey Hsu, MD (panelist) VERY GOOD	Jeffrey Hsu, MD (panelist) SATISFACTORY	Jeffrey Hsu, MD (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	Jeffrey Hsu, MD (panelist) POOR
Dieter Manstein, MD, PhD (panelist)	Dieter Manstein, MD, PhD (panelist) EXCELLENT	Dieter Manstein, MD, PhD (panelist) VERY GOOD	Dieter Manstein, MD, PhD (panelist) SATISFACTORY	Dieter Manstein, MD, PhD (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	Dieter Manstein, MD, PhD (panelist) POOR
Thomas Rohrer, MD (panelist)	Thomas Rohrer, MD (panelist) EXCELLENT	Thomas Rohrer, MD (panelist) VERY GOOD	Thomas Rohrer, MD (panelist) SATISFACTORY	Thomas Rohrer, MD (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	Thomas Rohrer, MD (panelist) POOR

Question Title

* 3. Feminine Rejuvenation: Are Lasers and Energy Sources the Solution?

	EXCELLENT	VERY GOOD	SATISFACTORY	BELOW AVERAGE	POOR
Macrene Alexiades MD, PhD	Macrene Alexiades MD, PhD EXCELLENT	Macrene Alexiades MD, PhD VERY GOOD	Macrene Alexiades MD, PhD SATISFACTORY	Macrene Alexiades MD, PhD BELOW AVERAGE	Macrene Alexiades MD, PhD POOR
Margaret A. Weiss, MD	Margaret A. Weiss, MD EXCELLENT	Margaret A. Weiss, MD VERY GOOD	Margaret A. Weiss, MD SATISFACTORY	Margaret A. Weiss, MD BELOW AVERAGE	Margaret A. Weiss, MD POOR
Roy Geronemus, MD	Roy Geronemus, MD EXCELLENT	Roy Geronemus, MD VERY GOOD	Roy Geronemus, MD SATISFACTORY	Roy Geronemus, MD BELOW AVERAGE	Roy Geronemus, MD POOR
Elizabeth Tanzi, MD (panelist)	Elizabeth Tanzi, MD (panelist) EXCELLENT	Elizabeth Tanzi, MD (panelist) VERY GOOD	Elizabeth Tanzi, MD (panelist) SATISFACTORY	Elizabeth Tanzi, MD (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	Elizabeth Tanzi, MD (panelist) POOR
Mathew Avram, MD, JD (panelist)	Mathew Avram, MD, JD (panelist) EXCELLENT	Mathew Avram, MD, JD (panelist) VERY GOOD	Mathew Avram, MD, JD (panelist) SATISFACTORY	Mathew Avram, MD, JD (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	Mathew Avram, MD, JD (panelist) POOR

Question Title

* 4. Controversies: Complex Cases, Complications and Comments

	EXCELLENT	VERY GOOD	SATISFACTORY	BELOW AVERAGE	POOR
Sara Hogan, MD - Vascular Complications from Liposuction	Sara Hogan, MD - Vascular Complications from Liposuction EXCELLENT	Sara Hogan, MD - Vascular Complications from Liposuction VERY GOOD	Sara Hogan, MD - Vascular Complications from Liposuction SATISFACTORY	Sara Hogan, MD - Vascular Complications from Liposuction BELOW AVERAGE	Sara Hogan, MD - Vascular Complications from Liposuction POOR
Prasanthi Kandula, MD - Vascular Complications from Liposuction	Prasanthi Kandula, MD - Vascular Complications from Liposuction EXCELLENT	Prasanthi Kandula, MD - Vascular Complications from Liposuction VERY GOOD	Prasanthi Kandula, MD - Vascular Complications from Liposuction SATISFACTORY	Prasanthi Kandula, MD - Vascular Complications from Liposuction BELOW AVERAGE	Prasanthi Kandula, MD - Vascular Complications from Liposuction POOR
Ashish Bhatia, MD - Does Topical Therapy Enhance Body Contouring?	Ashish Bhatia, MD - Does Topical Therapy Enhance Body Contouring? EXCELLENT	Ashish Bhatia, MD - Does Topical Therapy Enhance Body Contouring? VERY GOOD	Ashish Bhatia, MD - Does Topical Therapy Enhance Body Contouring? SATISFACTORY	Ashish Bhatia, MD - Does Topical Therapy Enhance Body Contouring? BELOW AVERAGE	Ashish Bhatia, MD - Does Topical Therapy Enhance Body Contouring? POOR
Jeffrey Hsu, MD - Laser Assisted Fat Grafting	Jeffrey Hsu, MD - Laser Assisted Fat Grafting EXCELLENT	Jeffrey Hsu, MD - Laser Assisted Fat Grafting VERY GOOD	Jeffrey Hsu, MD - Laser Assisted Fat Grafting SATISFACTORY	Jeffrey Hsu, MD - Laser Assisted Fat Grafting BELOW AVERAGE	Jeffrey Hsu, MD - Laser Assisted Fat Grafting POOR
Girish Munavalli, MD - Fat Harvesting Purification and Transfer: New Techniques	Girish Munavalli, MD - Fat Harvesting Purification and Transfer: New Techniques EXCELLENT	Girish Munavalli, MD - Fat Harvesting Purification and Transfer: New Techniques VERY GOOD	Girish Munavalli, MD - Fat Harvesting Purification and Transfer: New Techniques SATISFACTORY	Girish Munavalli, MD - Fat Harvesting Purification and Transfer: New Techniques BELOW AVERAGE	Girish Munavalli, MD - Fat Harvesting Purification and Transfer: New Techniques POOR
Chee Goh, MD - Dark Under Eye Circles	Chee Goh, MD - Dark Under Eye Circles EXCELLENT	Chee Goh, MD - Dark Under Eye Circles VERY GOOD	Chee Goh, MD - Dark Under Eye Circles SATISFACTORY	Chee Goh, MD - Dark Under Eye Circles BELOW AVERAGE	Chee Goh, MD - Dark Under Eye Circles POOR
Arielle Kauvar, MD - Dark Under Eye Circles	Arielle Kauvar, MD - Dark Under Eye Circles EXCELLENT	Arielle Kauvar, MD - Dark Under Eye Circles VERY GOOD	Arielle Kauvar, MD - Dark Under Eye Circles SATISFACTORY	Arielle Kauvar, MD - Dark Under Eye Circles BELOW AVERAGE	Arielle Kauvar, MD - Dark Under Eye Circles POOR
Jordan Wang, MD, MBE, MBA - Survey Results: Counterfeit Medical Devices and MedSpa Complications	Jordan Wang, MD, MBE, MBA - Survey Results: Counterfeit Medical Devices and MedSpa Complications EXCELLENT	Jordan Wang, MD, MBE, MBA - Survey Results: Counterfeit Medical Devices and MedSpa Complications VERY GOOD	Jordan Wang, MD, MBE, MBA - Survey Results: Counterfeit Medical Devices and MedSpa Complications SATISFACTORY	Jordan Wang, MD, MBE, MBA - Survey Results: Counterfeit Medical Devices and MedSpa Complications BELOW AVERAGE	Jordan Wang, MD, MBE, MBA - Survey Results: Counterfeit Medical Devices and MedSpa Complications POOR
Brian Biesman, MD, FACS (panelist)	Brian Biesman, MD, FACS (panelist) EXCELLENT	Brian Biesman, MD, FACS (panelist) VERY GOOD	Brian Biesman, MD, FACS (panelist) SATISFACTORY	Brian Biesman, MD, FACS (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	Brian Biesman, MD, FACS (panelist) POOR
Mattias Donelan, MD, FACS (panelist)	Mattias Donelan, MD, FACS (panelist) EXCELLENT	Mattias Donelan, MD, FACS (panelist) VERY GOOD	Mattias Donelan, MD, FACS (panelist) SATISFACTORY	Mattias Donelan, MD, FACS (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	Mattias Donelan, MD, FACS (panelist) POOR
Merete Haedersdal, MD, PhD, DMSc (panelist)	Merete Haedersdal, MD, PhD, DMSc (panelist) EXCELLENT	Merete Haedersdal, MD, PhD, DMSc (panelist) VERY GOOD	Merete Haedersdal, MD, PhD, DMSc (panelist) SATISFACTORY	Merete Haedersdal, MD, PhD, DMSc (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	Merete Haedersdal, MD, PhD, DMSc (panelist) POOR

Question Title

* 5. Controversies: Pearls @ Controversies & Conversations

	EXCELLENT	VERY GOOD	SATISFACTORY	BELOW AVERAGE	POOR
Brian Biesman, MD, FACS - IPL for Ocular Rosacea and Dry Eye?	Brian Biesman, MD, FACS - IPL for Ocular Rosacea and Dry Eye? EXCELLENT	Brian Biesman, MD, FACS - IPL for Ocular Rosacea and Dry Eye? VERY GOOD	Brian Biesman, MD, FACS - IPL for Ocular Rosacea and Dry Eye? SATISFACTORY	Brian Biesman, MD, FACS - IPL for Ocular Rosacea and Dry Eye? BELOW AVERAGE	Brian Biesman, MD, FACS - IPL for Ocular Rosacea and Dry Eye? POOR
George Hruza, MD, MBA - In Office Compounding: Is the End Near?	George Hruza, MD, MBA - In Office Compounding: Is the End Near? EXCELLENT	George Hruza, MD, MBA - In Office Compounding: Is the End Near? VERY GOOD	George Hruza, MD, MBA - In Office Compounding: Is the End Near? SATISFACTORY	George Hruza, MD, MBA - In Office Compounding: Is the End Near? BELOW AVERAGE	George Hruza, MD, MBA - In Office Compounding: Is the End Near? POOR
Lauren Bonati, MD - Pain Misperceptions	Lauren Bonati, MD - Pain Misperceptions EXCELLENT	Lauren Bonati, MD - Pain Misperceptions VERY GOOD	Lauren Bonati, MD - Pain Misperceptions SATISFACTORY	Lauren Bonati, MD - Pain Misperceptions BELOW AVERAGE	Lauren Bonati, MD - Pain Misperceptions POOR
Arielle Kauvar, MD - Rapid Improvement of Severe Acne ... Using PDL	Arielle Kauvar, MD - Rapid Improvement of Severe Acne ... Using PDL EXCELLENT	Arielle Kauvar, MD - Rapid Improvement of Severe Acne ... Using PDL VERY GOOD	Arielle Kauvar, MD - Rapid Improvement of Severe Acne ... Using PDL SATISFACTORY	Arielle Kauvar, MD - Rapid Improvement of Severe Acne ... Using PDL BELOW AVERAGE	Arielle Kauvar, MD - Rapid Improvement of Severe Acne ... Using PDL POOR
Lisa Kellet, MD, FRCPC - Deoxycholic Acid for Lipomas	Lisa Kellet, MD, FRCPC - Deoxycholic Acid for Lipomas EXCELLENT	Lisa Kellet, MD, FRCPC - Deoxycholic Acid for Lipomas VERY GOOD	Lisa Kellet, MD, FRCPC - Deoxycholic Acid for Lipomas SATISFACTORY	Lisa Kellet, MD, FRCPC - Deoxycholic Acid for Lipomas BELOW AVERAGE	Lisa Kellet, MD, FRCPC - Deoxycholic Acid for Lipomas POOR
Jason Pozner, MD, FACS (panelist)	Jason Pozner, MD, FACS (panelist) EXCELLENT	Jason Pozner, MD, FACS (panelist) VERY GOOD	Jason Pozner, MD, FACS (panelist) SATISFACTORY	Jason Pozner, MD, FACS (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	Jason Pozner, MD, FACS (panelist) POOR
Christine Dierickx, MD (panelist)	Christine Dierickx, MD (panelist) EXCELLENT	Christine Dierickx, MD (panelist) VERY GOOD	Christine Dierickx, MD (panelist) SATISFACTORY	Christine Dierickx, MD (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	Christine Dierickx, MD (panelist) POOR
Macrene Alexiades, MD, PhD (panelist)	Macrene Alexiades, MD, PhD (panelist) EXCELLENT	Macrene Alexiades, MD, PhD (panelist) VERY GOOD	Macrene Alexiades, MD, PhD (panelist) SATISFACTORY	Macrene Alexiades, MD, PhD (panelist) BELOW AVERAGE	Macrene Alexiades, MD, PhD (panelist) POOR

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 6. Please share any comments on faculty or lectures.

Question Title

* 7. Were the presentations objective and free of commercial bias?

Yes

If you answered no, please indicate what was perceived as commercial bias (non-educational and/or promotional) and the name of the presenter or the presentation title.

Question Title

* 8. To what extent were the LEARNING OBJECTIVES met?

	EXCELLENT	VERY GOOD	SATISFACTORY	BELOW AVERAGE	POOR
Identify and manage the spectrum of cosmetic and functional skin conditions treatable with energy-based devices.	Identify and manage the spectrum of cosmetic and functional skin conditions treatable with energy-based devices. EXCELLENT	Identify and manage the spectrum of cosmetic and functional skin conditions treatable with energy-based devices. VERY GOOD	Identify and manage the spectrum of cosmetic and functional skin conditions treatable with energy-based devices. SATISFACTORY	Identify and manage the spectrum of cosmetic and functional skin conditions treatable with energy-based devices. BELOW AVERAGE	Identify and manage the spectrum of cosmetic and functional skin conditions treatable with energy-based devices. POOR
Determine optimum therapy of choice for noninvasive treatment of pigmentary and vascular cutaneous lesions, photoaging, and face and body chronologic aging.	Determine optimum therapy of choice for noninvasive treatment of pigmentary and vascular cutaneous lesions, photoaging, and face and body chronologic aging. EXCELLENT	Determine optimum therapy of choice for noninvasive treatment of pigmentary and vascular cutaneous lesions, photoaging, and face and body chronologic aging. VERY GOOD	Determine optimum therapy of choice for noninvasive treatment of pigmentary and vascular cutaneous lesions, photoaging, and face and body chronologic aging. SATISFACTORY	Determine optimum therapy of choice for noninvasive treatment of pigmentary and vascular cutaneous lesions, photoaging, and face and body chronologic aging. BELOW AVERAGE	Determine optimum therapy of choice for noninvasive treatment of pigmentary and vascular cutaneous lesions, photoaging, and face and body chronologic aging. POOR
Explain to patients the rationale for use of chosen laser or aesthetic surgical treatments, interpret what has been written in the scientific literature to wording understandable to a layperson, and recommend appropriate interventions for their concerns.	Explain to patients the rationale for use of chosen laser or aesthetic surgical treatments, interpret what has been written in the scientific literature to wording understandable to a layperson, and recommend appropriate interventions for their concerns. EXCELLENT	Explain to patients the rationale for use of chosen laser or aesthetic surgical treatments, interpret what has been written in the scientific literature to wording understandable to a layperson, and recommend appropriate interventions for their concerns. VERY GOOD	Explain to patients the rationale for use of chosen laser or aesthetic surgical treatments, interpret what has been written in the scientific literature to wording understandable to a layperson, and recommend appropriate interventions for their concerns. SATISFACTORY	Explain to patients the rationale for use of chosen laser or aesthetic surgical treatments, interpret what has been written in the scientific literature to wording understandable to a layperson, and recommend appropriate interventions for their concerns. BELOW AVERAGE	Explain to patients the rationale for use of chosen laser or aesthetic surgical treatments, interpret what has been written in the scientific literature to wording understandable to a layperson, and recommend appropriate interventions for their concerns. POOR

Learning outcomes:

Question Title

* 9. I learned the following that will have an impact on my current techniques and/or future practice:

Question Title

* 10. I plan to seek more information on the following topic(s):

Question Title

* 11. My attitude about the presented content has changed as follows:

Commitment to change:

Question Title

* 12. What change(s) do you plan to make as a result of participating in this educational activity?

Question Title

* 13. What barriers do you anticipate that may prevent you from making the above change(s)?

Question Title

* 14. What was the overall quality of the conference?

	EXCELLENT	VERY GOOD	SATISFACTORY	BELOW AVERAGE	POOR
The level of presentations were appropriate.	The level of presentations were appropriate. EXCELLENT	The level of presentations were appropriate. VERY GOOD	The level of presentations were appropriate. SATISFACTORY	The level of presentations were appropriate. BELOW AVERAGE	The level of presentations were appropriate. POOR
There was sufficient time for questions.	There was sufficient time for questions. EXCELLENT	There was sufficient time for questions. VERY GOOD	There was sufficient time for questions. SATISFACTORY	There was sufficient time for questions. BELOW AVERAGE	There was sufficient time for questions. POOR
I had plenty of time with the faculty.	I had plenty of time with the faculty. EXCELLENT	I had plenty of time with the faculty. VERY GOOD	I had plenty of time with the faculty. SATISFACTORY	I had plenty of time with the faculty. BELOW AVERAGE	I had plenty of time with the faculty. POOR
The slides were clear and easy to see.	The slides were clear and easy to see. EXCELLENT	The slides were clear and easy to see. VERY GOOD	The slides were clear and easy to see. SATISFACTORY	The slides were clear and easy to see. BELOW AVERAGE	The slides were clear and easy to see. POOR
The handout was a useful tool.	The handout was a useful tool. EXCELLENT	The handout was a useful tool. VERY GOOD	The handout was a useful tool. SATISFACTORY	The handout was a useful tool. BELOW AVERAGE	The handout was a useful tool. POOR
The meeting room was comfortable.	The meeting room was comfortable. EXCELLENT	The meeting room was comfortable. VERY GOOD	The meeting room was comfortable. SATISFACTORY	The meeting room was comfortable. BELOW AVERAGE	The meeting room was comfortable. POOR
The course information was up-to-date.	The course information was up-to-date. EXCELLENT	The course information was up-to-date. VERY GOOD	The course information was up-to-date. SATISFACTORY	The course information was up-to-date. BELOW AVERAGE	The course information was up-to-date. POOR

Thank you for completing this evaluation for Sunday’s sessions.
Save the date for next year: August 7-9, 2020 in Vancouver!