Skip to content
AASECT 2019 Annual Conference Evaluation - #134
Concurrent Session
Navigating the Ick Factor: Ethical and Practical Considerations in Assessing and Treating Potentially Problematic
Sexual Interests and Behaviors (#134)
Presenter: Silvestro Weisner, PhD
Friday, June 14, 2019; 1.5 CE
We appreciate your help in evaluating this session. Please indicate your rating of the presentation in the categories below by selecting the appropriate number, using a scale of 1 (low) through 5 (high).
1.
OBJECTIVES
This session met the stated objectives of:
Strongly disagree
1
Disagree
2
Neither agree or disagree
3
Agree
4
Strongly agree
5
develop an understanding of how the Ick factor (i.e., disgust) influences clinical judgments regarding sexual interests and behavior;
Strongly disagree
1
Disagree
2
Neither agree or disagree
3
Agree
4
Strongly agree
5
review the ethical principles (for psychology, social work, and counseling) that guide decision-making regarding the proper assessment and treatment of potentially problematic sexual interests and behaviors;
Strongly disagree
1
Disagree
2
Neither agree or disagree
3
Agree
4
Strongly agree
5
gain awareness of empirical research regarding the prevalence of various potentially problematic sexual interests and behavior, and will learn how to apply this awareness to ethical assessment and treatment.
Strongly disagree
1
Disagree
2
Neither agree or disagree
3
Agree
4
Strongly agree
5
2.
Speaker(s)
1
2
3
4
5
Knowledgeable in content areas
1
2
3
4
5
Content consistent with objectives
1
2
3
4
5
Clarified content in response to questions
1
2
3
4
5
3.
Content
Strongly disagree
1
Disagree
2
Neither agree or disagree
3
Agree
4
Strongly agree
5
Appropriate for intended audience
Strongly disagree
1
Disagree
2
Neither agree or disagree
3
Agree
4
Strongly agree
5
Consistent with stated objectives
Strongly disagree
1
Disagree
2
Neither agree or disagree
3
Agree
4
Strongly agree
5
4.
Teaching Methods
1
2
3
4
5
Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content
1
2
3
4
5
Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter
1
2
3
4
5
5.
Relevancy
1
2
3
4
5
Information could be applied to practice
1
2
3
4
5
Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal
1
2
3
4
5
6.
How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?
Very Little - 1
2
3
4
Great Deal - 5
Very Little - 1
2
3
4
Great Deal - 5
7.
How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
Not Useful - 1
2
3
4
Extremely Useful - 5
Not Useful - 1
2
3
4
Extremely Useful - 5
8.
This workshop enhanced my professional expertise.
Substantially
Somewhat
Not at All
9.
I would recommend this workshop to others.
Yes
No
Not Sure