Pre-Conference Workshop Evaluation

Sexual Attitude Reassessment (SAR) (#101, 103, 107)
Presenter: Cindy Lee Alves, MEd
Wednesday, June 12, 2019 - Thursday, June 13, 2019
12 CE
We appreciate your help in evaluating this pre-con. Please indicate your rating of the presentation in the categories below by selecting the appropriate number, using a scale of 1 (low) through 5 (high).

Question Title

* 1. OBJECTIVES
This pre-con met the stated objectives of:

  Strongly disagree
1
Disagree
2
Neither agree or disagree
3
Agree
4
Strongly agree
5
define intersectionality and explain at least three (3) ways it impacts work as a sexuality professional;
recognize at least two (2) areas in their current work that are in need of intersectional adaptations;
describe microaggressions and provide at least two (2) examples;
indicate at least two (2) sexuality topics that are personally challenging and at least two (2) that they are comfortable discussing;
label at least two (2) parts of the sexual and reproductive system;
differentiate between assigned sex at birth, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and sexual identity;
identify at least two (2) sexual identities and recognize the harm of heterocentrism;
identify at least two (2) gender identities and recognize the harm of ciscentrism;
evaluate at least one (1) sexuality behavior they believe to be risqué;
classify at least two (2) sexual behaviors within the kink spectrum;
name at least (2) examples of relationship diversity (nonmonogamy);
appreciate examining their attitudes, values, and beliefs around sexuality topics.

Question Title

* 2. Speaker(s)

  1 2 3 4 5
Knowledgeable in content areas
Content consistent with objectives
Clarified content in response to questions

Question Title

* 3. Content

  Strongly disagree
1
Disagree
2
Neither agree or disagree
3
Agree
4
Strongly agree
5
Appropriate for intended audience
Consistent with stated objectives

Question Title

* 4. Teaching Methods

  1 2 3 4 5
Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content
Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter

Question Title

* 5. Relevancy

  1 2 3 4 5
Information could be applied to practice
Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?

Question Title

* 7. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?

Question Title

* 8. This workshop enhanced my professional expertise.

Question Title

* 9. I would recommend this workshop to others.

T