Skip to content

AASECT 2019 Annual Conference Evaluation - #101, 103 & 107

Pre-Conference Workshop Evaluation

Sexual Attitude Reassessment (SAR) (#101, 103, 107)
Presenter: Cindy Lee Alves, MEd
Wednesday, June 12, 2019 - Thursday, June 13, 2019
12 CE
We appreciate your help in evaluating this pre-con. Please indicate your rating of the presentation in the categories below by selecting the appropriate number, using a scale of 1 (low) through 5 (high).
1.OBJECTIVES
This pre-con met the stated objectives of:
Strongly disagree
1
Disagree
2
Neither agree or disagree
3
Agree
4
Strongly agree
5
define intersectionality and explain at least three (3) ways it impacts work as a sexuality professional;
recognize at least two (2) areas in their current work that are in need of intersectional adaptations;
describe microaggressions and provide at least two (2) examples;
indicate at least two (2) sexuality topics that are personally challenging and at least two (2) that they are comfortable discussing;
label at least two (2) parts of the sexual and reproductive system;
differentiate between assigned sex at birth, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and sexual identity;
identify at least two (2) sexual identities and recognize the harm of heterocentrism;
identify at least two (2) gender identities and recognize the harm of ciscentrism;
evaluate at least one (1) sexuality behavior they believe to be risqué;
classify at least two (2) sexual behaviors within the kink spectrum;
name at least (2) examples of relationship diversity (nonmonogamy);
appreciate examining their attitudes, values, and beliefs around sexuality topics.
2.Speaker(s)
1
2
3
4
5
Knowledgeable in content areas
Content consistent with objectives
Clarified content in response to questions
3.Content
Strongly disagree
1
Disagree
2
Neither agree or disagree
3
Agree
4
Strongly agree
5
Appropriate for intended audience
Consistent with stated objectives
4.Teaching Methods
1
2
3
4
5
Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content
Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter
5.Relevancy
1
2
3
4
5
Information could be applied to practice
Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal
6.How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?
Very Little - 1
2
3
4
Great Deal - 5
7.How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
Not Useful - 1
2
3
4
Extremely Useful - 5
8.This workshop enhanced my professional expertise.
9.I would recommend this workshop to others.