Health Equity Rounds 23: Health Equity for Disabled Patients and Staff - HER 23 Team - Seattle Children's

11/04/2026

At the completion of this program, the participant will be able to:

1. Define disability, key terminology, and frameworks relevant to health equity.
2. Describe the historical context and politicization of disability rights and disability justice and their impact on healthcare today.
3. Recognize how implicit bias and systemic barriers contribute to health disparities experienced by patients and healthcare workers with disabilities.
4. Identify strategies to promote health equity, advocate for accessibility, and partner effectively with patients and colleagues with disabilities.

Question Title

1. First Name: (Required.)

Question Title

2. Last Name: (Required.)

Question Title

3. Preferred Pronouns:

Question Title

4. NABP e-Profile ID# (required in order to receive credit): (Required.)

Question Title

5. DOB Month and Date -ex.: April 4th is 0404 (required in order to receive credit): (Required.)

Question Title

6. Member or Registration Type: (Required.)

Question Title

7. Secret Code: (Required.)

Question Title

8. Email Address: (Required.)

Question Title

9. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Logan Lore (Required.)

	Excellent	Very Good	Average	Fair	Poor
Met activity stated objectives listed above	Met activity stated objectives listed above Excellent	Met activity stated objectives listed above Very Good	Met activity stated objectives listed above Average	Met activity stated objectives listed above Fair	Met activity stated objectives listed above Poor
Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Excellent	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Very Good	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Average	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Fair	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Poor
Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Excellent	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Very Good	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Average	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Fair	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Poor
Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Excellent	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Very Good	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Average	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Fair	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Poor
Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Excellent	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Very Good	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Average	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Fair	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Poor
Educational materials were useful and valuable	Educational materials were useful and valuable Excellent	Educational materials were useful and valuable Very Good	Educational materials were useful and valuable Average	Educational materials were useful and valuable Fair	Educational materials were useful and valuable Poor
Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Excellent	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Very Good	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Average	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Fair	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Poor
Overall speaker rating	Overall speaker rating Excellent	Overall speaker rating Very Good	Overall speaker rating Average	Overall speaker rating Fair	Overall speaker rating Poor

If you rated any evaluation question as 2 (below average/disagree) or 1 (poor/strongly disagree), please explain:

Question Title

10. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Danielle Schalk (Required.)

	Excellent	Very Good	Average	Fair	Poor
Met activity stated objectives listed above	Met activity stated objectives listed above Excellent	Met activity stated objectives listed above Very Good	Met activity stated objectives listed above Average	Met activity stated objectives listed above Fair	Met activity stated objectives listed above Poor
Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Excellent	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Very Good	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Average	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Fair	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Poor
Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Excellent	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Very Good	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Average	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Fair	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Poor
Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Excellent	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Very Good	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Average	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Fair	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Poor
Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Excellent	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Very Good	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Average	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Fair	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Poor
Educational materials were useful and valuable	Educational materials were useful and valuable Excellent	Educational materials were useful and valuable Very Good	Educational materials were useful and valuable Average	Educational materials were useful and valuable Fair	Educational materials were useful and valuable Poor
Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Excellent	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Very Good	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Average	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Fair	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Poor
Overall speaker rating	Overall speaker rating Excellent	Overall speaker rating Very Good	Overall speaker rating Average	Overall speaker rating Fair	Overall speaker rating Poor

If you rated any evaluation question as 2 (below average/disagree) or 1 (poor/strongly disagree), please explain:

Question Title

11. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Kelly Luong (Required.)

	Excellent	Very Good	Average	Fair	Poor
Met activity stated objectives listed above	Met activity stated objectives listed above Excellent	Met activity stated objectives listed above Very Good	Met activity stated objectives listed above Average	Met activity stated objectives listed above Fair	Met activity stated objectives listed above Poor
Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Excellent	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Very Good	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Average	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Fair	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Poor
Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Excellent	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Very Good	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Average	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Fair	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Poor
Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Excellent	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Very Good	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Average	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Fair	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Poor
Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Excellent	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Very Good	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Average	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Fair	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Poor
Educational materials were useful and valuable	Educational materials were useful and valuable Excellent	Educational materials were useful and valuable Very Good	Educational materials were useful and valuable Average	Educational materials were useful and valuable Fair	Educational materials were useful and valuable Poor
Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Excellent	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Very Good	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Average	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Fair	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Poor
Overall speaker rating	Overall speaker rating Excellent	Overall speaker rating Very Good	Overall speaker rating Average	Overall speaker rating Fair	Overall speaker rating Poor

If you rated any evaluation question as 2 (below average/disagree) or 1 (poor/strongly disagree), please explain:

Question Title

12. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Mimi Garimella (Required.)

	Excellent	Very Good	Average	Fair	Poor
Met activity stated objectives listed above	Met activity stated objectives listed above Excellent	Met activity stated objectives listed above Very Good	Met activity stated objectives listed above Average	Met activity stated objectives listed above Fair	Met activity stated objectives listed above Poor
Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Excellent	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Very Good	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Average	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Fair	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Poor
Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Excellent	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Very Good	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Average	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Fair	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Poor
Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Excellent	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Very Good	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Average	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Fair	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Poor
Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Excellent	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Very Good	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Average	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Fair	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Poor
Educational materials were useful and valuable	Educational materials were useful and valuable Excellent	Educational materials were useful and valuable Very Good	Educational materials were useful and valuable Average	Educational materials were useful and valuable Fair	Educational materials were useful and valuable Poor
Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Excellent	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Very Good	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Average	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Fair	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Poor
Overall speaker rating	Overall speaker rating Excellent	Overall speaker rating Very Good	Overall speaker rating Average	Overall speaker rating Fair	Overall speaker rating Poor

If you rated any evaluation question as 2 (below average/disagree) or 1 (poor/strongly disagree), please explain:

Question Title

13. Were the activities presented in a fair and unbiased manner? (Required.)

Yes

Question Title

14. If not, please describe the situation:

Question Title

15. Is there a skill set or knowledge area in your practice that you need more training?

Question Title

16. Additional Comments:

Question Title

17. Which model of disability views disability as an individual’s condition or defect? (Required.)

Medical model

Social model

Biopsychosocial model

Disability Justice

Question Title

18. Which of the following are true regarding the Olmstead vs L.C. ruling in 1999? (Required.)

The Supreme Court ruled that unjustified segregation of people with disabilities is discrimination and a violation of Title II of the ADA.

The ruling reduced reliance on segregated institutions and expanded the right to community living, affirming that people with disabilities have a right to live, work and receive services in their communities.

The Department of Justice released a memo this year saying that neither the ADA nor Section 504 requires states to provide services to people in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs.

All of the above

Question Title

19. What are some health disparities seen in disabled people? (Required.)

Delayed care due to access barriers

Higher unmet care needs

Higher incidence of chronic health conditions

All of the above

Question Title

20. Barriers to getting accommodations in workplace or getting care include: (Required.)

Stigma and assumptions about capability

Managing their own health needs along with their child’s

Intersectional forms of oppression due to gender, race, geographical location, social determinants of health

All of the above

Health Equity Rounds 23: Health Equity for Disabled Patients and Staff - HER 23 Team - Seattle Children's

11/04/2026

Question Title

* 1. First Name: (Required.)

Question Title

* 2. Last Name: (Required.)

Question Title

* 3. Preferred Pronouns:

Question Title

* 4. NABP e-Profile ID# (required in order to receive credit): (Required.)

Question Title

* 5. DOB Month and Date -ex.: April 4th is 0404 (required in order to receive credit): (Required.)

Question Title

* 6. Member or Registration Type: (Required.)

Question Title

* 7. Secret Code: (Required.)

Question Title

* 8. Email Address: (Required.)

Question Title

* 9. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Logan Lore (Required.)

Question Title

* 10. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Danielle Schalk (Required.)

Question Title

* 11. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Kelly Luong (Required.)

Question Title

* 12. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Mimi Garimella (Required.)

Question Title

* 13. Were the activities presented in a fair and unbiased manner? (Required.)

Question Title

* 14. If not, please describe the situation:

Question Title

* 15. Is there a skill set or knowledge area in your practice that you need more training?

Question Title

* 16. Additional Comments:

Question Title

* 17. Which model of disability views disability as an individual’s condition or defect? (Required.)

Question Title

* 18. Which of the following are true regarding the Olmstead vs L.C. ruling in 1999? (Required.)

Question Title

* 19. What are some health disparities seen in disabled people? (Required.)

Question Title

* 20. Barriers to getting accommodations in workplace or getting care include: (Required.)

1. First Name: (Required.)

2. Last Name: (Required.)

3. Preferred Pronouns:

4. NABP e-Profile ID# (required in order to receive credit): (Required.)

5. DOB Month and Date -ex.: April 4th is 0404 (required in order to receive credit): (Required.)

6. Member or Registration Type: (Required.)

7. Secret Code: (Required.)

8. Email Address: (Required.)

9. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Logan Lore (Required.)

10. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Danielle Schalk (Required.)

11. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Kelly Luong (Required.)

12. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Mimi Garimella (Required.)

13. Were the activities presented in a fair and unbiased manner? (Required.)

14. If not, please describe the situation:

15. Is there a skill set or knowledge area in your practice that you need more training?

16. Additional Comments:

17. Which model of disability views disability as an individual’s condition or defect? (Required.)

18. Which of the following are true regarding the Olmstead vs L.C. ruling in 1999? (Required.)

19. What are some health disparities seen in disabled people? (Required.)

20. Barriers to getting accommodations in workplace or getting care include: (Required.)