Ahearn_Olivia_23October_2017

Graduate School of Oceanography - OCG 695
23 October, 3:30 PM, Coastal Institute Auditorium

Justine Sauvage
The contribution of water radiolysis to subseafloor sedimentary life

In marine sediment, radiolysis of water by radiation from naturally occurring radionuclides leads to production of reduced (H2) and oxidized (H2O2, O2) species. Although this radiochemical process has been known for over a century radiolytic yields in earth abundant materials are still unexplored. We experimentally quantified radiolytic H2 yields (H2 produced per unit of absorbed energy in solution) due to γ radiation (Cs-137) and α radiation (Po-210) in marine sediment by exposing seawater slurries of sediment to radiation and measuring the production of H2. These experiments demonstrate that water radiolysis is catalyzed by marine sediment. The magnitude of catalysis depends on sediment composition and radiation type. Deep-sea clay is especially effective at enhancing H2 yields, increasing yield by more than an order of magnitude relative to pure water. This previously unrecognized catalytic effect of marine sediment on radiolytic H2 production is important for fueling microbial life in the subseafloor, especially in sediment with high catalytic power. Our analysis of 9 sites in the North Atlantic, North and South Pacific suggests that H2 is the primary microbial fuel in organic-poor sediment older than a few million years; at these sites, calculated radiolytic H2 consumption rates are more than an order of magnitude higher than organic-matter oxidation rates. Similarly, in subseafloor ecosystems of continental margins, which are depleted in strong oxidants, catalyzed production of radiolytic O2 and H2O2 is a previously unrecognized cryptic source of electron acceptors.

Justine Sauvage received a BS in Physical Geography (2008), MS in Earth System Sciences (2010) and MS in Oceanography (2013) from the Free University Brussels, Leuven University and the University of Rhode Island, respectively. She entered GSO as PhD in the Spring of 2013. Her major professor are Steven’ D’Hondt, Arthur Spivack and David Fastovsky.

Question Title

* 1. EVALUATOR FIRST NAME

Question Title

* 2. EVALUATOR LAST NAME

Question Title

* 4. What aspects of the presentation were successful?  Why?

Question Title

* 5. What do you suggest to improve?

Question Title

* 6. ABSTRACT METHODS/RESULTS: Methods succinctly identified the methods used. Results are succinct and provide a specific explanation of what was discovered, accomplished, collected or produced.

Question Title

* 7. ABSTRACT MOTIVATION/IMPACT: Succinctly describes and appropriately connects the subject and background to the purpose of the research . Provides a succinct interpretation of the results and evaluates what the results mean to the investigation and the field of study.

Question Title

* 8. PRESENTATION ORGANIZATIONAL PATTERN: Specific introduction and conclusion, sequenced material within the body and transitions.

Question Title

* 9. PRESENTATION STYLE: Posture, gestures, eye contact and use of the voice.  Speaker stands and moves with authority, looks more often at the audience than notes, uses the voice expressively, and uses few vocal fillers (‘um” “uh,” “like,” “you know,” etc.).

Question Title

* 10. PRESENTATION SUPPORTING MATERIAL: Slide contents, figures, table, supporting material support the presentation and facility the central message.

Question Title

* 11. PRESENTATION CENTRAL MESSAGE AND CONTENT:  The main point/thesis/bottom line/take away of the presentation. A clear central message is easy to identify and compelling (broader impacts.)

Question Title

* 12. PRESENTATION - ANSWER QUESTIONS: Speaker demonstrates understanding of material and answers the questions asked and is respectful.

T